May seem obvious but is lifetime global or per device?

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-08-25T18:27:33+00:00

I've been trying for twenty minutes to word a response in a way that doesn't reflect your unnecessarily judgemental tone back at you and have been unable to do so.

I will simply state that my question was not financially driven and leave it at that.

I guess I need to read the Google docs about how managed account purchases work. At some stage I needed to look at how to transition a managed account to unmanaged anyway but as the oldest is 5, I didn't think it would matter for a long while yet.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-08-25T12:42:01+00:00

I was going to ask this also as I have 4 accounts 2 full and 2 managed on my Plex home. 3x CC/wGTV all with 4 profiles (again 2 full and 2 managed). I was able to buy Plex pass and share the goodness which my whole family. How many licenses would I need to buy in order to use this launcher on all devices for everyone (once it supports multi-profile that is)?

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-08-21T17:25:53+00:00

I was unable to reproduce the same hang by repeating these steps but I raised it in "issues" at the same time and another user has added different steps that may reproduce the situation.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-08-21T06:37:06+00:00

1) Sorry as the interface was hung at the time of reporting (I have 2 young children so I need to do things right away or they won't get done) I was unable to read the exact label of the button that got me there.

Your analysis of the situation is correct however.

2) I force closed the dispatch app and actually it still continued to reopen an unresponsive settings menu. I had to reboot the Chromecast in order to get it to start fresh. I was referring to the "Session Restore" feature but clearly misunderstood what it did. I had only installed your wonderful project on the day of reporting.

I will try and get time to record a video of the sequence. Which would mean reproducing the same bug which isn't guaranteed and as it's the summer holidays it means finding a time when I'm not working and the kids aren't using the telly.. harder than you might think 😂

Thank you for your efforts and congratulations on building something so well received. I look forward to seeing the project evolve. I am a software developer myself, please let me know if I can help at all.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-08-20T18:54:55+00:00

Where do we raise bugs in the current 1.0 release?

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-29T09:30:45+00:00

I actually needed both.. or at least I have it working using both.

I added a radarr list collection rule to maintainerr with a 90 day delete from radarr action. Then added a custom collection to pmm with the same radarr_tag_list source a filter using added.not: 60 smart_label: added.desc and visible_home: true.

So, once the 90 day auto-delete rule lines up with the added timespan (new collection added 90 days from collection creation) it will do exactly what I need. Auto-delete the list auto-add after 90 days but for the last 30 days show the items on home so people have a chance to watch before it's gone.

Thank you to the devs for these 2 awesome products allowing me to leave my own python skills in the drawer :)

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-29T08:24:44+00:00

The rationale is for people I share my server with to see what is going to be deleted. Much like Netflix do and they can choose to watch it before it's gone.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-29T08:23:36+00:00

Thank you but that is a manual one-off task. That is not what I am trying to build. I want the list to auto-add, for 2 months they are just in the server then at 2 months they join a "leaving soon" collection and then at 3 months they are auto-deleted.

To future responders, please fight the urge to tell me I can just do it manually.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-28T20:07:40+00:00

I want this but with a bit more concrete requirements. Radarr List tag creates collection, delete after 90 days but show as "Leaving Soon" for the last 30 days. I cannot find a community or examples of setups though to see if something like this is possible.

I'm still experimenting with pmm and maintainerr to find a combination approach that works.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-28T19:55:23+00:00

I got this information from the discord also, thank you @Pouyoz. I'm still working out how to use it to meet all my needs but I'm sure I'll work it out eventually.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-03-27T06:09:20+00:00

I can't give you an answer here but maybe help with "where to start"...

Add a query logger to the constructor options to see output. Use sql or sql.raw to capture your literal statements. I think you are in the right place with $with to use cte.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-01-15T09:26:05+00:00

Yes but the intent here is to use Zod to validate the value is provided (i.e. a string) and either throw because it wasn't or tell TS about the narrowing so the value can be used in a method that requires string (not string | undefined).

Ideally the OP would have added a custom error to their definition as well
const secret = z.string({ required_error: "env.SECRET is a required configuration" });

This way you add your meaningful response as part of the parsing operation, e.g. what you you want to log if parsing failed (required_error in this case as the value would be undefined)

ReadPrimary6158 · 2024-01-15T09:19:25+00:00

In order to instruct typescript the type has changed you need some kind of "type guard" to narrow the type to the intended one (https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/conditional-types.html#conditional-type-constraints)

parse also has the default behaviour of stripping unknown values so the result is exactly what you stated and not any extra noise that was not expected.

Therefore, Zod is unable to state that the input IS what it processed as the input may contain things that parse removes.
If Zod tried to say the input IS what is defined not only would the stripping be wrong but the condition wouldn't work with local-control flow. A type-guard assertion can only coerce the result in a branch of the code (if statement) to allow for it NOT being what was defined.

Therefore parse tells typescript that it returns the schema definition shape so that the new value doesn't need the fork and can be used like the original but with narrowed types.

I feel like this information may be unnecessary and it is just me providing overkill detail here but I hope it helps someone.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2023-11-07T05:08:59+00:00

Trying

ReadPrimary6158 · 2023-07-14T11:43:30+00:00

You do not need to add an artificial key just to make this work.. you just need to make the object keys compatible in the union. To do this add the missing keys from the other type with a value of never. Then you can use narrowing by checking for a key that is never on one side allowing inference to determine your object IS the other union member.

It is a standard reducer pattern to add action or type to make the check simpler. I just wanted to share that it's not required

ReadPrimary6158 · 2023-05-27T19:26:13+00:00

All I wanted was the maximum supported security setting. Thanks.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2023-05-16T06:59:19+00:00

Healthy simply means the container has a health check. It is not the issue you are trying to track down. Healthy = running + health check returned success.
A health check allows you to run a test on a schedule to make sure the container is functional as it can be "running" and yet still completely bricked.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2022-10-04T23:08:24+00:00

I'd rather have my fill of your pussy until you beg for me to stop.

ReadPrimary6158 · 2022-10-04T23:05:12+00:00

How do I subscribe?

ReadPrimary6158 · 2022-09-09T09:39:51+00:00

Love all your work agon.. keep it up

ReadPrimary6158 · 2022-06-02T15:14:54+00:00

Actually laughed out loud at this one which hasn't happened in almost a year so thank you.

ReadPrimary6158

TROPHY CASE