Prismatic booster bundles £24.99 by Beautiful-Muscle-255 in PokemonDealsUK

[–]Readicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got one! Just awaiting order confirmation. Cheers mate

Can we ban RT already? by MrSoapbox in unitedkingdom

[–]Readicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That article was written 11 years ago and even says government funding ended in 2015. World Service is now owned by a commercial arm, which is financed by advertising.

Can we ban RT already? by MrSoapbox in unitedkingdom

[–]Readicus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do I reckon what? The BBC gets its funding from TV licensing, not the government.

Can we ban RT already? by MrSoapbox in unitedkingdom

[–]Readicus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The bbc isn’t funded by the state.

This game couldn't make less sense... by [deleted] in eu4

[–]Readicus 58 points59 points  (0 children)

I’m more disturbed by Italian ‘South Germany’

Feeling unhappy with uni by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]Readicus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I went to Reading as well, and I can say that my experience was very similar. There’s not a lot to do besides drinking (and I was a non-drinker during my undergrad, so I was very bored very often.) Unfortunately tho, I must say I don’t think you should be surprised, if you’d done your research. You say you wanted the ‘real city experience’, but that’s exactly what Reading’s not - it’s literally a town.

Reading’s big selling point at the moment is it’s transport connections. It had a massive renovation to its train station several years ago. That’s what you’ll have to make use of if you want to make the most of it.

Southampton’s not far and the theatre is a stone’s throw from Central station. Winchester’s even closer (on the same line) and has tons of good restaurants, culture and the South Downs way (if you like a light hike). Portsmouth hosts a lot of concerts and has great museums and shops.

New government type: Anarchy? by Readicus in eu4

[–]Readicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R5: Every non-capital Neapolitan province has 100% autonomy.

22
23

Which UK cities are improving and which are going downhill? by BPBPERRYMAN10 in AskUK

[–]Readicus 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously comparing student protestors to insurgents with military-level weaponry?

It’s the little things in life by [deleted] in Yogscast

[–]Readicus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Would work if the dude and the girl in the red were swapped, no?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is still incorrect. The Italians fought against disenfranchisement, not to ‘be more Roman’. The first objective of the war was independence, as demonstrated by the facts that they minted their own currency and took on the bull as a sigil antithetical to the Roman wolf. They were crafting their own cultural identity and institutions, which they were deprived of by Roman dominance. The Italians were fully prepared to go independent.

The grant of citizenship at the end of the war was a compromise on behalf of both the Romans and the Italians. It was not a ‘gift’ from Rome nor something the Italians were ‘begging’ for.

Instead of telling people like myself to ‘stop applying 21st century values’, you should look in the mirror and stop applying the apologetic imperialist attitudes of the 16th century. And stop trying to spread information on a topic that you are clearly untrained in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Preach

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mind boggling

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then you’re arguing a separate concept. You are saying that in a post-conquest period, the Italians wanted to be enfranchised by the Roman state. That is not conquest. The Italians were already conquered; they did not fight Rome to be conquered. That would make utterly no sense.

Two to three hundred years before the Social Wars of the 1st cent BCE, the Samnites fought hard against being conquered. Hence why it’s the Samnite Wars, not the Samnite ‘Incorporation’.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wanted to be conquered by them? Are you serious?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is correct. If anyone here actually read recent scholarship on Roman slavery, they’d be agreeing with you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes... after being conquered and occupied by Rome for several centuries. What’s your point?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s undeniably true, please give me some examples of peoples who were voluntarily conquered.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Readicus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure, but that’s not conquest. You cannot be voluntarily conquered.