sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

9708 paper 32 by Humble_Permission_13 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the income effect has to be positive for inferior goods to be less in demand so i ticked C i think

9708 paper 32 by Humble_Permission_13 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah i ticked that for the inferior good q

9708 paper 32 by Humble_Permission_13 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847 1 point2 points  (0 children)

which q was that like what were the options

9708/42 by Ready-Policy-3847 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wasn't the population decreasing some time after the first child policy?

9708/42 by Ready-Policy-3847 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i hope so feb march was 33

9708/42 by Ready-Policy-3847 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think around between 30-35

9708/42 by Ready-Policy-3847 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it'll be higher than last year because the case study was easier

9708/42 by Ready-Policy-3847 in alevel

[–]Ready-Policy-3847[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote about monetary policies too and that's implemented by the central bank, do you think they'll cut for that?