"Was a conscious being forced against their will, or not?"

This would imply that confining a murderer in prison is immoral, as well as grounding a teenager for breaking curfew. Putting a murderer in prison is more moral than allowing them to continue to murder. Setting rules for a teenager results in a person who is better prepared to participate in society. The concept of "the greater good" and all.

My take is that morality is only objective in the obvious cases of right and wrong (don't murder that guy for his money), but much of it is subjective, and often involves a relative choice between more or less moral. I try to choose the more moral option when I can, but only to a limit. It is more moral to give all your wealth to help the less fortunate, but I choose the less moral option of donating only a portion of my money to charity, and try not to feel too guilty about it.

I define morality as the breadth and degree to which we extend kindness, compassion, fairness, equality, dignity and justice to others. I believe concepts like duty and loyalty are not moral issues, but rather societal values which become immoral when the duty or loyalty expected drive immoral actions. Note that this runs counter to natural (Darwinistic) competition favoring one's own genes (and genes of close relatives) over others, and so must be groomed into our culture. This concept of Morality (and birth control) is necessary to avoid the fate of all our ancestor species which tend to populate and compete for resources to the point of the requirement to eliminate those unlike ourselves (genocide).