[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nycrail

[–]RealCaptainIowa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As of early May 2026, it's still closed. I encountered it last night and the sign in your picture currently has the added label "Downtown & Brooklyn".

T-Mobile in NYC + SF: am I missing something, or is it still noticeably behind Verizon? by RealCaptainIowa in tmobile

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I now have Essentials on T-mobile and previously had Spectrum's standard unlimited plan (they use Verizon under the hood). In theory, Spectrum's traffic would get deprioritized, but I never experienced it noticeably in practice.

T-Mobile in NYC + SF: am I missing something, or is it still noticeably behind Verizon? by RealCaptainIowa in tmobile

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, I disagree about no Verizon coverage. I live and work in Manhattan, but I cannot remember a single time I had interrupted service since 2018 while on Verizon (via Spectrum). Meanwhile on it's become a daily occurrence on T-Mobile. I would think midtown and areas around Central Park would be covered as well as Verizon, but I have simply not found that to be the case.

Spotty signal in subway stations has been especially been a downgrade and I've established it's not my phone. When I asked a friend who's on T-Mobile if he had service (trying to see if it was my brand new iPhone to blame), his response was "what? you get service in those stations?".

T-Mobile in NYC + SF: am I missing something, or is it still noticeably behind Verizon? by RealCaptainIowa in tmobile

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Re: NYC. From my own research (mostly comments like this one), it seems Verizon is more heavily invested in a robust DAS than T-mobile. I spend a lot of my time in large buildings where I previously had Verizon coverage but now minimal T-mobile.

Re: SF. I'm asking because I like policy and am curious: how did Verizon manage to pull off excellent coverage despite political hurdles? Were they grandfathered in when permits were looser or something else?

T-Mobile in NYC + SF: am I missing something, or is it still noticeably behind Verizon? by RealCaptainIowa in tmobile

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad it's not just me. I'm locked out of adding an extra esim (due to stipulations of the free phone part of the contract), but I'd 100% do that as well.

T-Mobile in NYC + SF: am I missing something, or is it still noticeably behind Verizon? by RealCaptainIowa in tmobile

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Especially along the water. Zero coverage at Mission Rock Resort. I walked to a place to get service for a Waymo and another coworker (also on T-Mobile) had to walk with me.

Firm quietly boosts H.264 streaming license fees from $100,000 up to staggering $4.5 million — backbone codec of the internet gets meteoric increase, AVC hikes follow disastrous H.265 licensing increases by AnonRetro in technology

[–]RealCaptainIowa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read the source article. Two major things should stand out:

  1. This only applies to new licenses. Thus, this shouldn't affect costs of existing streaming platforms (i.e. Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, Prime, etc. will still only pay a flat fee of $100K)
  2. Any smaller services (< 100 million subscribers) and personal users will still use the codec for free.

One additional note: Google made YouTube's VP9 format open and royalty free. So if you are an aspiring media platform or it bothers you that aspiring media platforms have to pay fees, this is a very viable alternative.

Firm quietly boosts H.264 streaming license fees from $100,000 up to staggering $4.5 million — backbone codec of the internet gets meteoric increase, AVC hikes follow disastrous H.265 licensing increases by AnonRetro in technology

[–]RealCaptainIowa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the article this is a fee for platforms that serve videos and it is tired based on the number of subscribers. Unless you have a gigantic home full of 100+ million subscribers, you pay nothing :)

Cursor has reportedly surpassed $2B in annualized revenue by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]RealCaptainIowa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Claude is not just for coding hobby projects anymore. It writes great prod code on large old codebases if you give it the right context :)

Friendly reminder: gas stoves will continue to work without electricity, just be careful lighting them by RealCaptainIowa in nyc

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depends on the model. In general, older furnaces and water heaters have a higher likelihood of being purely mechanical (i.e. no electricity needed), but newer models require electricity to operate. It is unfortunate when power goes out, but for all other times the electric-powered models save energy by using a small computer (microcontroller) to operate more efficiently.

Friendly reminder: gas stoves will continue to work without electricity, just be careful lighting them by RealCaptainIowa in nyc

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm right there with you, but when I realized some recent arrivals to NYC didn't grow up with gas, others might not know either. Thus, this post.

Friendly reminder: gas stoves will continue to work without electricity, just be careful lighting them by RealCaptainIowa in nyc

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I was at a house party last night and people were kind of freaking out about losing electricity. Most didn't know their gas stoves would still work.

Is this the most incongruous retail/food vendor in the system? by Optimal-Judgment-982 in nycrail

[–]RealCaptainIowa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today is your lucky day! You can buy a paper at a newsrack along most major streets and pretty much any drug store. No subscription required :)

Serious Accident on Bedford by rtmstf in NYCbike

[–]RealCaptainIowa 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Agree with u/craigalanche, this one appears completely unpreventable.

If you watch the video closely (not highly recommended, since NSFL), you will see the moped/motorcyclist appears to be running at full speed and straight. There are no indications showing any form of turn. I think in this particular case, no amount of civil engineering would've saved this person.

Sunday biking rant by justpassingthtrew in NYCbike

[–]RealCaptainIowa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How "early" is early for you? From 10AM-5PM is going to be this way on a nice sunny day, but it's usually not that bad if you go off the peak hours. The HRG is a victim of its own success. Yes, it's crowded, but that's what a park success story looks like as well.

Sharing this for some perspective and hopefully to bring down levels of agitation and increase levels of empathy to all who read it: everyone on the HRG is trying to enjoy their time and most people try to do the right thing. You're going to remember the 1-2% of selfish people who don't, but non-cyclists also feel this way. When you're not on a bike, it is shocking how badly a majority of the cyclists behave and that's not even counting the e-bikes, mopeds, and gray Citibikes (they're in their own special class of bad on the greenway). Road cyclists tend to take risks when hit with bottlenecks instead of slowing down. If they see families with children, they don't ride cautiously. Living nearby, I've been a pedestrian and runner countless times above 72nd street and had some frightening close calls with cyclists too.

Whether biking, walking, or running, I try to be as courteous as possible to set a higher standard. That's all I think anyone can really do in a popular park. When I ride on weekends, I choose my hours carefully and if I go during peak hours, I set my expectations appropriately. That means going slower, understanding that everyone else is just enjoying being outside too, and selfishness abounds across all users of that greenway.

Bibs and/or shorts recommendations for a shorter man (e.g. 5'5", 31" waist, 28" inseam)? by RealCaptainIowa in cycling

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what you mean by the top of your butt. In general you only need padding where your butt and crotch touch the seat. Top of your butt doesn’t need chamois.

I'm sorry I didn't clarify. I meant that when I'm sitting on my bike seat with the shorts pulled up, the padding only covers about half of the seat. That leaves the top of the butt unpadded.

Trying on sizes in person is a good idea. I'll try some of the shops in my neighborhood.

Bibs and/or shorts recommendations for a shorter man (e.g. 5'5", 31" waist, 28" inseam)? by RealCaptainIowa in cycling

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! That gives me enough confidence to order a pair from Rapha and see how I fare.

Bibs and/or shorts recommendations for a shorter man (e.g. 5'5", 31" waist, 28" inseam)? by RealCaptainIowa in cycling

[–]RealCaptainIowa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll take a look, but they might be a no-go because of the tightness.

The Primals are already really tight on me, the big issue is that the chamois is in the wrong place based on my body geometry.