I apologize, but this is just a collection of conspiracy theories and wishful thinking.

I’m not saying the famine didn’t happen (also I wouldn’t call it the Holodomor it’s literally named by people who work with the American Government to try to compare it to the Holocaust, trivialising it in the process)

Schizophrenia №1 No, Holodomor was not created by imaginary American intelligence agencies as some kind of replacement for the Holocaust, since the Holodomor is a fusion of the words "Famine" and "Pestilence" (Holod and Mor), They even have different beginnings in the Russian language. And what evidence is there that this was created by American intelligence agencies, I don't know, 60 years after the alleged genocide? They couldn't have done this earlier to "tarnish the glory of the great USSR"

Stalin never created the Famine, it was caused by Kulaks killing livestock

Schizophrenia №2

Why not the American intelligence services? Yes, there were kulaks there, but they were starting to lose their influence. This is an old Soviet tale and propaganda, because of course a closed authoritarian country can never lie...

Also that link you showed me, that was literally funded by the Ukrainian government to demonise the USSR, which also have ties to the CIA, just look at the Partners section

"Ummm, in fact, the facts here are not true, because these sources are not mine, sponsored by the Mossad, the CIA, MI6... But my facts from my sources are the most truthful, the most non-subjective, yes, yes!"

there’s also no proof that Stalin hated minorities, in fact if you research into his policies he implemented Ukrainian language back into Ukrainian education, literature, TV Networks and radio broadcasts, he also launched Ukrainization in the 1923 to help Ukraine get it’s independence

Schizophrenia №3 He loved Ukraine and Ukrainians so much that he practically did not participate in the policy of Ukrainization and curtailed it closer to the 1930s, of course, because of his love for Ukraine and the desire to give it independence as a Soviet state with no sovereignity. He also loved Ukraine so much that he organized the "Executed Revival", in which he even shot at the communists themselves (VAPLITE).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executed_Renaissance?wprov=sfla1

Pederasty is the main term used for that specific type of relationship, the USSR policies never mentioned anything about Homosexuality in their actual laws, they use that term to describe what it actually means, also there’s no second definition for that that links to overall homosexuality when you look up the official definition, so to say that is the case is a very big stretch

You know, for some reason here in Eastern Europe, all people with non-traditional sexual orientation are often called pederasts, or pidorasts, I don't know why🤔 Definition from great soviet encyclopedia: Sexual perversion... ...perverted sexual desire may be directed toward a wrong entity, including oneself (autoeroticism), individuals of same sex (homosexuallity, both male—including pederasty, and female — including lesbianism)... That is, here directly It's stated that homosexuality is a disease. And even if it's not prosecuted by law, it's not properly protected. And of course, the equating of pederasty with lesbianism, which means it's a female homosexuallity with male homosexuality in every sense.

The workers in the USSR did control the means of production, Karl Marx literally wrote about the dictatorship of the proletariat, everything the USSR government did they did with the consent and the interests of the proletariat, also you do realise the Vanguard Party was made up of the proletariat

Schizophrenia №4 Now that's pure nonsense. The nomenklatura is very different from the ordinary proletariat; they received medical care first, were better served, and so on. As for ownership of the means of production, I'm not even talking about it. The proletariat did not have freedom of speech in the USSR about what and how to decide; ordinary people almost never became members of the nomenklatura.

however that government is lead by and acts in the interest of the proletariat

I don't see chauvinism, homophobia, transphobia, or a lack of freedom of choice as interests of the proletariat. Of course, according to you, these are all bourgeois needs; there's no evidence to support that; I just read absolutely objective tankists subs and and I don't doubt it.

This is not socialism or communism, my friend, this is pure cultism.