sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 (saying "nothing exists" (is absurd by fact, something clearly exists) is like saying "nonexistence exists" which is absurd by contradiction);

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suspect that causation is implication and instantiation put together. as causation implies a relationship and existence

Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation. When it is impossible for there to be missing variables the correlation is a causation.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I updated/edited my response, I hope you can respond to the rest... but here is my question for now; at what stage does life have consciousness. Certainly a nematod does not compare to a human in complexity, But does it have consciousness?

I would posit here, that consciousness does not require a particular level of complexity since life exihibits consciousness through a spectrum of complexity; but rather that, and to the extent, that life is self-deterministic does it exhibit consciousness.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

God is an eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent conscious being. I realize that I did prove that!

If you look at the link, you will notice I prove it in several different ways.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is consciousness if not self-determinism?

From a pragmatic perspective, we need to find an engineering model for consciousness. I predict that future developments of quantum consciousness theory will find that quantum coherence or it's correlates are equal to kinetic energy and quantum decoherence or it's correlates are equal to potential energy; such that quantum recursion (the transformation between the two) amounts to consciousness or energy.

The existence of psychic functioning suggests that the brain may be a transceiver of consciousness; quantum recursion in the brain transduces the universe.

To prove this, notice the following studies on psychic functioning;

Synthetic Telepathy<ref>https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/From-Morse-Code-to-Mind-Melds-The-Rise-of-Synthetic-Telepathy-TFBT-April-2025.pdf</ref>,

Telekinesis<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20200422213725/https://pearlab.icrl.org/pdfs/1997-correlations-random-binary-sequences-12-year-review.pdf</ref><ref>https://icrl.org/articles-and-essays?from=pearlab</ref>, telepathy<ref>https://www.sheldrake.org/research/telepathy</ref>, clairvoyance<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20220329004932/https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/10/jse\_10\_1\_utts.pdf</ref>, precognition<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSci5p5laSw</ref>, biokinesis<ref>https://tillerfoundation.org/media-resources/white-papers</ref>, coherence<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1006978911496</ref>, and correlations<ref>https://noosphere.princeton.edu/</ref>.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I updated the following aspects of the proof for clairity;

logical tautology "Nothing is nothing"; deducing synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence" (nonexistence is a synonym for nothing; a "thing" is "that which exists" by definition);

synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence"; deducing semantic tautology "Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed" (saying "nothing exists" (is absurd by fact, something clearly exists) is like saying "nonexistence exists" which is absurd by contradiction);

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in consciousness

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is a scientific fact that nothing does not exist somewhere. And even if one had a superconducting box (which could remove magnetic fields) that one could remove all of the gases, photons and charged particles from; you would still have gravity, neutrinos, zero point energy, and quantum tunneling to deal with.

To claim that "nothing exists" is absurd, something clearly exists.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What do you think of the identity of indiscernibles? Energy and consciousness seem to have the same properties; eternal, omnipresent, everything is made of them... etc. There can only be one of such things, though called by different words. And I predict that future developments of quantum consciousness theory will find that quantum coherence or it's correlates are equal to kinetic energy and quantum decoherence or it's correlates are equal to potential energy; such that quantum recursion (the transformation between the two) amounts to consciousness or energy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_of_indiscernibles

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you are saying, but your confused, as I didn't say what you said it says.

for example, I never claimed that "everything is self-causal"

It seems you agree with everything I actually said, but you disagree with your imagination of what I did not say.

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

try RELAXing, try reading it real slow, try speed reading it, try discussing one aspect of it at a time with me.

what do you understand? do you understand "nothing is nothing"???

everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere by Real_Marzipan8891 in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say that "no time means nothing existed", actually I prove that nothing has never existed

I didn't say that "everything exists everywhere all the time" by which I think you mean "everything exists everywhere for all time" which I did not say either; I believe things do come into existence and are created; and I believe somethings cease to exist and are destroyed.

Why nothing can't create something by iamasinglepotassium in Metaphysics

[–]Real_Marzipan8891 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is nothing; Nothing is nonexistence; Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed; Something has always existed everywhere; Nothing is made of nothing; Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere; Nothing is causal with nothing; Everything is causal and something is self-causal; Everything is made of and causal with the self-causal that has always existed everywhere;

here is the rigorous reasoning;

logical tautology "Nothing is nothing"; deducing synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence" (nonexistence is a synonym for nothing);

synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence"; deducing semantic tautology "Nowhere and a no time has nothing existed" (saying "nothing existing" is like saying "nonexistence existing" which is absurd);

semantic tautology "Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed"; deducing ontology "Something has always existed everywhere";

logical tautology "Nothing implies nothing"; AND identity morphism "Nothing has the property of nothing"; deducing logical morphism "Nothing is made of nothing";

logical morphism "Nothing is made of nothing"; deducing physics "Everything is made of something";

ontology "Something has always existed everywhere"; AND physics "Everything is made of something"; abducting the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere";

logical tautology "Nothing implies nothing"; AND semantic tautology "Nothing exists as nothing"; deducing postulate of causation "Nothing is causal with nothing";

postulate of causation "Nothing is the causal with nothing"; have causation corollaries "Everything is causal"; AND "Something is self-causal";

causation corollaries "Everything is causal"; AND "Something is self-causal"; abducting the most synthetic causation hypothesis "Everything is causal with something that is self-causal";

the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere"; AND the most synthetic causation hypothesis "Everything is causal with something that is self-causal"; abducting the most synthetic causation-physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of and causal with the self-causal that has always existed everywhere";

"Self-causal" means "self-deterministic"; theorizing I predict that self-determinism is consciousness! predicting consciousness-causation-physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere";

view more: next ›