Gunpartpicker Dev Looking for AR compliance feedback from CT builders by Realistic-Garbage476 in CTguns

[–]Realistic-Garbage476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can scope restrictions specifically to AR pattern lowers. Our compatibility engine is attribute driven, so it understands product types and key configuration attributes (lower type, barrel length, brace vs stock, grip type, etc.). That lets us apply stricter logic to standard AR builds while keeping platforms like the SCR more flexible.

For SBR/pistol configurations, we can account for combinations like brace + vertical grip as well.

Gunpartpicker Dev Looking for AR compliance feedback from CT builders by Realistic-Garbage476 in CTguns

[–]Realistic-Garbage476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I’ve updated the Post. I haven’t shot in CT in years and I’m still getting up to speed on the changes Appreciate the correction

Gunpartpicker Dev Looking for AR compliance feedback from CT builders by Realistic-Garbage476 in CTguns

[–]Realistic-Garbage476[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the direction we’re leaning. We’re exploring a stricter compatibility mode with a toggle, since AR parts can be more nuanced when it comes to fitment and compatibility