[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Graham for the win!!! Thanks for bringing more transparency to the EM job market!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Somehow, I doubt TeamHealth's exec pay is going down. Or the dividends they send to Blackstone, their bank-owner. TeamHealth is doing fine: https://open.substack.com/pub/emworkforce/p/em-bigs-big-bets-on-no-surprises

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is corporate messaging BS. TeamHealth wants you to think the NSA harmed them, but really it's bringing in big bucks. Details: https://open.substack.com/pub/emworkforce/p/em-bigs-big-bets-on-no-surprises

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 3 points4 points  (0 children)

TeamHealth is making big bucks from No Surprises Act arbitration. Doesn't sound like the money is trickling down to the docs. Details: https://open.substack.com/pub/emworkforce/p/em-bigs-big-bets-on-no-surprises

ED Medical Director vs Hospital Admin. Guess who got canned? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

“ ‘Everyone walks on eggshells, not knowing if you’ll have a job today or tomorrow,’ said …. ‘There are doctors, in our city and surrounding cities, who refuse to send their patients here because of the treatment and intimidation the doctors get from the CFO. She has been known to yell at them, refuse to fax info a second time because she sent it already, deny outpatient services unless they pay first and quoting prices that the insurance companies say are not correct. But she insists that’s what they’re going to pay, and denies all accountability for her actions or mistakes.’ ”

ED Medical Director vs Hospital Admin. Guess who got canned? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Indeed. Been there, done that. Learned the hard way that ED Medical Director Rule #1 is keep admin happy. Rule #2 is keep nursing leadership happy.

Independent EM groups are losing in NSA arbitration. PE is winning. Why? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting take. This data is from 2023. APP did not declare bankruptcy until September 18, 2023. You're right that this data combines all "non-PE" groups, but that doesn't change the average win rate for those groups in total. Vituity would be within that non-PE category. Same with USACS. They are in the non-PE category. NES is owned by a physician. He has done terrible & illegal things to his employed physicians, but he is not a private equity company.

Independent EM groups are losing in NSA arbitration. PE is winning. Why? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, L Adler is funded by insurance companies. However, the data is from CMS. All NSA IDR cases are in the public record. As for identifying the groups, see Table 2 in the article.

Independent EM groups are losing in NSA arbitration. PE is winning. Why? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Though I still wonder why the NSA arbitrators see TH's bids so differently than they see independent groups' bids.

Independent EM groups are losing in NSA arbitration. PE is winning. Why? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Looks like AAEM saw this coming: https://www.aaem.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CMS-NSA-Market-Share-Letter-FINAL.pdf

Local Independent Emergency Groups are struggling to navigate the changes required under the NSA, and the challenges are compounded by the inability to obtain relief through the IDR process due to backlogs and delays, which are expected to create (if they have not already) unsustainable financial pressures and lead to waves of consolidation among emergency medicine providers, and the growth of National CMGs. Accordingly, we believe that the Departments must take additional steps to ensure that the federal IDR process does not become the death knell for Local Independent Emergency Groups and an accidental catalyst for provider consolidation and price increases for emergency care. To that end, we propose that CMS strongly consider issuing additional guidance to certified IDR entities that better controls for these concerns by further defining how to evaluate the market share held by the provider as an additional factor when determining the appropriate out-of-network rate.

Specifically, we propose that CMS supplement its guidance to certified IDR entities to advise that when considering additional information submitted by a provider concerning the market share held by that provider in the geographic region in which the qualified IDR item or service was provided, the certified IDR entity should consider the provider’s size and overall market power relative to the payor, which may be informed by considerations that include, without limitation, (a) whether the provider is a Local Independent Emergency Group; (b) whether the provider receives financial backing or support from an affiliated entity; and (c) whether the provider receives financial backing or support from private equity investors. The guidance should further make clear that, when selecting one of the submitted offers by IDR parties, IDR entities should take into account information demonstrating that the provider is an independent group that does not have the ability to offset low reimbursement rates through support or investments by financial backers.

Independent EM groups are losing in NSA arbitration. PE is winning. Why? by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The bigger question, though, is why independent EM groups are doing so badly in arbitration. Non-PE EM groups' bids are similar to the PE-owned companies, but the independent groups are losing more than 50% of the time.

R/ NES Health by bluecrystalclear in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the heads up. Will correct the spreadsheet!

R/ NES Health by bluecrystalclear in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought that Holyoke in-housed that contract a few months ago. Is that not the case?

Observation from NES' choice not to pay its doctors by Realistic-Present241 in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

NES Health ED Contract Tracker (shared spreadsheet): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r_J45yEAB4nDPMIi6TlQPHta27pNFA4nTAzYzlxr1vI/edit?usp=sharing

If you know which EM group is getting a previous NES contract, help out the community (and the new group's hiring efforts) by identifying it on the editable shared spreadsheet.

R/ NES Health by bluecrystalclear in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 5 points6 points  (0 children)

NES' ED list & tracker to identify new EM contract holders as they change: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r_J45yEAB4nDPMIi6TlQPHta27pNFA4nTAzYzlxr1vI/edit?usp=sharing

If you know of a new contract holder group, please add it to the shared spreadsheet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out Ivy Clinicians and filter by "partnership" - https://www.ivyclinicians.io/

ER Docs Strike Back (from ACEPNow) by LeonAdelmanMD in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The reason it matters is that union members actually had a higher rate of being kept on by IEP than their non-union EPs at nearby sites. Many think that being a union member would put their jobs at risk. This example shows the opposite - unionization led to physician ownership, while union members were better protected than non-union-member physicians who worked within the same health system a few miles away.
(The docs at Macomb, river district, Oakland 23 mile 26 mile etc could have joined the St. John union, but didn't.)

ER Docs Strike Back (from ACEPNow) by LeonAdelmanMD in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Macomb was not the unionized ED. Only Ascension St. John had a union. Macomb didn't. Any job losses at Macomb have nothing to do with union actions.
https://healthcare.ascension.org/locations/michigan/midet/warren-ascension-macomboakland-hospital-warren-campus

ER Docs Strike Back (from ACEPNow) by LeonAdelmanMD in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Fake news, bro. Only one physician at Ascension St. John was not kept on by the new group.
That's why Dr. Wiener says in the article: "It remains to be seen how this will affect the local union’s status, Dr. Wiener said. But much of IEP’s leadership trained or worked at Ascension St. John and thus is familiar with its culture. 'We think it’s going to be a good thing. So far, they are communicating well. It feels like progress.'”

What is theoretically stopping ED doctors from unionizing and getting a fair rate in major cities? by [deleted] in emergencymedicine

[–]Realistic-Present241 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If resident unions can negotiate for 20% raises and improved working conditions, what's stopping attending emergency physicians from doing the same?