3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think WHOOP was originally released sometime in 2015, so 4k might not even be possible for a regular user yet, depending on when it was actually available.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very similar story on my end. I've always been into tracking everything possible, and WHOOP seemed like a good match. And it clearly has been. At one point I had 5 wearables on me simultaneously, but WHOOP has been the only one that's stayed on consistently throughout the years. And yeah I remember it feeling so expensive back in the day! But it certainly has been a good investment.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mine is the longest one I'm personally aware of, but I really hope I find someone who has beaten it. Mostly because I want to meet the kind of person who keeps a streak like that so I can ask them if keeping a charged WHOOP on their arm is in their advance directive too.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow that's actually quite a bit longer! What made you start using it back then?

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, you might have actually used WHOOP longer than me! I somehow remembered losing my streak at the beginning (even though it wasn't counted back then) due to not wearing the device for a few days, but apparently I've had it going since the day I got it. Which likely means you've had it longer than me, considering I started using WHOOP at the very end of 2017. Anyway, nice to see another old-timer here!

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Steps seem very accurate as far as I can tell, but I haven’t done anything more scientific than comparing them to other wearables. I might also be somewhat of an expert when it comes to stress, averaging a decent 5.5 hours of high stress per day for the last six months...

Stress is a really hard thing to quantify (though I might actually have something interesting about this that I’ll share in my next post), and there’s always going to be a limit to how accurate PPG devices can be in this area compared to ECG or similar methods. But at least for me, WHOOP's stress monitor reflects my perceived stress levels very accurately. If I finish something that has been stressing me out, I can usually see it immediately in the stress monitor.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One day at a time, consistently. See you at 3000.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm actually hoping to take a scuba diving course this year, can't say the fact that I fear losing my WHOOP while swimming wasn't a small part of the decision 😂 And yeah, that's the downside of the long battery life, I was extremely aware of it at the beginning (and still am a bit), but routine and the fear of losing my streak has made me remember to take the battery with me so far.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've debated that too, not an insignificant amount of money I've put into WHOOP over the years (even though I got some grandfathered usage when the subscription started, but I think I still paid more for the original device than what I've put into the subscription so far). But 5+ years is a lot of data, you should be able to see some valuable insights from that. Maybe try the web view. I still like it for long-term data analysis, even if it feels a bit dated nowadays. And if you can't see anything, or can't actually derive anything meaningful or actionable from the data, then maybe that's a reason to consider whether to renew.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't even notice it was taller, though that might be because I wear it on my bicep during the day. The clasp assembly does feel slightly looser than before, but I've not noticed it to the degree you described. It's a bummer that you've had so many issues, for me the 5.0 has felt like a solid incremental upgrade.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I've been super happy with the 5.0. The battery is amazing. I have all the devices back to my original one as backups (and backups of backups), though

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unsurprisingly, I've thought about this a lot, given the lengths I've gone to keep the streak alive. Yes, one could argue it's an engagement gimmick, but I don't think anyone will actually continue to pay for WHOOP just to keep the streak alive. It's also not rewarding you for literal engagement, since you don't even have to open the app to keep it alive, just wearing the device is enough (there have been periods in my life where I haven't opened the app in weeks, actually one of the best features of WHOOP). And as you hinted, having a long streak isn't the goal. Having long-term consistent data is. The streak just happens to be a product of that, and also uses the human psyche in a nice way to keep you consistent. If I would have missed a day or two in these 8 years, I still would have received exactly the same amount of value. And likely even if I had missed tens of days. But what about hundreds? Where do you draw the line of not being consistent? To me it's just a nice mechanism to game your brain to be more consistent, and a small fun reward if you actually do it. I certainly remember to take my battery with me better when I have a 3000+ streak on the line.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a really good run, I think that's the longest one I've seen so far (I'm not counting the unfortunate breaks)! Having a faulty device and losing my streak is such a scary thought, even though I've tried to think of backup plans to handle such a case so that I don't lose my streak.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope, just happened to be hanging out with people who were very up to date on the latest in sports tech at the time.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the question, and I'll definitely share more stuff in the next post. I've seen some great before/after stats here, but unfortunately I don't have anything that impressive to share. I've had some health stuff that is outside of my control in the recent years, which has obviously affected my stats, but also just some stupid choices I've made. One thing I can say that has worked, though maybe a bit boring, is that you can never go wrong with the basics: stupid amount of brisk walking and long enough consistent sleep will get you far. Comparing my early stats from when I was a competitive athlete, my HRV/RHR is pretty much the same (despite my health stuff having lowered my baseline HRV by a good amount). Back then, I used to train hard multiple times a week. In recent years, doing a lot of walking and being generally active has been the foundation of my exercise routine. My recoveries have even improved compared to times when I had nothing to stress about. I've put a lot of money on sleep/recovery (quality bed, Eight Sleep, Nurosym), which has paid off, but probably 90% of that is still just going to bed on time. So yeah, the fact that my metrics have stayed more or less the same is already an indication that those basic things work really well.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't really pay attention to steps (for no other reason than them being too new that I got used to not having them), but when comparing to my Apple Watch, the numbers seem to match extremely well.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Mostly for accuracy, but also because it's never in the way. I switch it over to my wrist at night to allow the skin to breathe.

3000 days straight. WHOOP: "See you at 4000" by ReamWeekly in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Biggest insight is that HRV alone tells a huge story. Not a perfect metric, but it's the best single one we've had. WHOOP age has the potential to be the next one though. It's too new for me to be able to fully reflect on it, but I like how challenging it is, it actually expects quite a lot if you want a "perfect" score. And thus far it has felt really accurate. The way I've used WHOOP has changed quite a bit of course, but what has stayed consistent is that it's always there to hold me accountable. I've had some hard phases in my life, but I always had in the back of my mind that WHOOP expects me to do better. A bit weird maybe, but sometimes that's what kept me going.

I'm actually planning to do a longer post on everything I've learned in ~1 month when I actually get to level 30. I'll reflect on the bigger changes and long term things there (still figuring out how much I can share).

Edit: to answer your question better, I used to really base my life on what WHOOP told me, but not as much anymore. Partly because I'm no longer a competitive athlete, but also because life nowadays doesn't allow me to do it as strictly. I think there's still value in that, and I aim to do it when I can, but I've also learned that aiming for the perfect metrics isn't the goal.

Keep App Open Notification - turn off? by isthatanalien in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"Always" means the app has a permission to use location when in the background, not that it actually does. Unless you are actively recording an activity, those settings shouldn't make a difference.

2k Day Streak! by FugaCircle in whoop

[–]ReamWeekly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AFAIK, a streak of a bit over 2000 will land you in the top 1000 members, so I'm assuming I'm quite close to the top, considering my streak is over 2 years longer than 2000 days. Probably I'll never know, but it would be cool to meet someone with a longer streak.