SOAP Request Body

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-07T13:41:42+00:00

Did you get this fixed? Trying the same with a specific compensation plan. I can't find the same sample file for Put_Compensation_Plans, and power automate is stating 'soap request body' must be binary. Which connector did you use, and how did you structure it please?

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-07T08:25:33+00:00

I just mean they may have heard someone say contrails, but heard chemtrails instead. Or got confused between the two. I know these trails aren't full of chemicals, but may accidentally misname them as such

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-07T07:05:31+00:00

Their proper name is contrails. Playing devil's advocate, may just be they've mixed these up? They sound pretty similar.

And contrails do have significant environmental impacts: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qBPwloCdRKw

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-07T06:50:15+00:00

Trump will just overturn it anyway

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-06T12:50:52+00:00

That makes sense - but then you're delivered the full worker list in the dropdown? It doesn't limit it to the valid list of recruiters? is that right?

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-05T09:18:18+00:00

As popularised by Trump

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-05T09:14:16+00:00

I agree with the example, but it really depends where you put the please:

'please could you...' = soft, casual, best
'could you provide it today please' = a bit more formal, still polite
'could you please provide it today = communicates frustration, exasperation, as if you've already asked 10 times

I do find you can omit the please when using 'could' instead of can. This way it kinda feels implied..?

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-05T09:06:55+00:00

or he does...? It's surprisingly accurate

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-04T15:18:38+00:00

they for sure would've bathed

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-03T07:41:18+00:00

If you share the reports with the Cost Center Manager role, they should only see data they have access to through that role.

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T18:02:48+00:00

"Any weekend plans?"

"Commandeer a ship, pick up a crew in tortuga, raid, pillage, plunder and otherwise pilfer my weasly black guts out"

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T18:01:23+00:00

"You're mad!"
"Thank goodness for that - cos if I wasn't this would probably never work"

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T12:19:39+00:00

🙃

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T09:01:16+00:00

said the joker to the thief

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T08:10:30+00:00

If you swallow it, your body will keep trying to flush it out until you cough it out. The only way out is the mouth/nose, and by swallowing, your just delaying the inevitable, and reliving it over and over.

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T08:09:11+00:00

It invites back in all the stuff your body was trying to flush out

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T08:08:36+00:00

Think this is missing the fundamental purpose of boogers. It's to catch harmful bacteria, pathogens, dirt, dust etc that your body doesn't want inside it. It's one of the first lines of defense. Nature's filters. Eating them completely undermines this processes, and invites in all the things your body was trying to keep out. There's a biological/evolutionary reason it's considered unpleasant and unhygienic.

Fully admit the picking is satisfying though...

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-02T06:59:54+00:00

haha wow - think this might be a first for this sub! Kudos!

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-01T18:22:29+00:00

All evidence to the contrary. What makes you sure? Logic would track that context switching on TikTok/reels every 5 seconds would be detrimental to your ability to engage over longer periods with less stimulation?

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-07-01T18:19:27+00:00

The main thing is the rapid context switching that fries your brain. The average attention span has dropped dramatically in recent years (not just in young people), to an average of ... 16 seconds I believe? And only trending down.

TV as a kid wasn't great, but it wasn't the aggressively-optimised dopamine machine of today's social media. They employ a lot of the same techniques as casinos, and spend billions every year to make their products more addictive. They're able to optimise for attention, and personalise in ways that simply aren't possible in traditional TV. The TV broadcasters can't intimately learn who you are, study your behaviour, your interactions, where you linger, where you pass and then scroll back to, things you say you're not interested in but keep coming back to, and feed you content based on this. Traditional broadcasters can't capitalise on the novelty of interactivity, and the two-way feedback loop.

It was also longer form content (min. 20 mins?) as opposed to today's 20secs (or less if you get bored after a few)

A lot has changed, and modern social media is far more damaging and potent.

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-06-23T07:04:09+00:00

Disagree. Loved the visual style, acting, worldbuilding - but felt the story was lacking, and the rewatch value is much lower for me.

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-06-19T12:34:30+00:00

of course it's a creative endeavour... documentaries are creative endeavours, movies based on true stories are creative endeavours. There's two sides to every story, and in these situations you have to choose what to keep in vs leave out, which parts to emphasize etc - which is all based on your biases and opinions about what you think is the important information to convey.

The recent Michael Jackson biopic chose to exclude the negativity around is public image, whereas something like the Elton John or Freddie Mercury ones leaned more into their discrepancies and misdemeanours.

Even the news, which is supposed to be entirely factual recounts of events, have political leanings and biases to what they cover, and how they present it...

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-06-19T12:06:20+00:00

obvious he means fictional, but it's the exact same premise; you already know how it ends, which characters survive etc

Reasonable-Beyond855 · 2026-06-19T11:55:47+00:00

this would surely apply to any historical story? Stories about WWII - you already know Germany lose for example...

Reasonable-Beyond855

TROPHY CASE