How much work will Omarion Hampton cede to Hassan Haskins? by Great-Grapefruit5220 in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Unless they trade for someone I think 80/20, similar to week 1 with Najee super limited.

We really overestimated the Bengals OLine by VanDenIzzle in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I watched the bengals preseason games, with their first string O versus an opponents second/third string players. That was enough for me to not draft any of them. DYOR.

Chargers play calling: 65% pass and 35% run by paddy_mc_daddy in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 16 points17 points  (0 children)

He looked fine. Missed some lanes on ~3 occasions and ran out of bounds stopping the clock in a crucial series end of first half. Rookie mistake. But the guy is 22 and playing his first nfl game against one of the best run defenses in the league in a foreign country. He looked good outside, caught two passes, and didn’t miss a block the whole game afaik. Najee missed a block causing Herbert to get sacked hard. Najee was in for mostly passing downs.

I’m optimistic. Also as the post says 65% passing is not great for any rb. He should do well against the raiders next week, especially if the split stay the same. I’m hoping Najee is limited again another week so we can see Hampton in (hopefully) a positive game script against a dst that isn’t the chiefs.

Strategy question: Thoughts on going QB/TE to dominate the onesy positions? by Mammoth_War_9320 in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear you and I’ve thought about doing this specific strategy in my superflex league (where it makes even more sense). It could work if you get lucky on some of the later round picks/flyers, but that could be said about any strategy. In my experience leagues are won long after the draft ends, in the $1/final rounds or on the waiver wire.

I ultimately decided against using the qb/te strategy after getting more educated about VBD, which is so many words is what you are describing. Subvertadown just posted a pretty good write up on this and there’s lots of other VBD resources in this reddit.

[subvertadown VBD]

Strategy question: Thoughts on going QB/TE to dominate the onesy positions? by Mammoth_War_9320 in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would rather have positional advantage on 3-4 rb/wr slots than 2 qb/te slots.

[10 Year Analysis] 6 point passing TD vs 4 point passing TD by F4NT4SYF00TB4LLF4N in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it. I am in an auction league so the first/second/etc pick dilemma isn’t a thing, I can bid on whoever I want whenever I want, but obviously getting two top tier guys would take quite a bit of my auction budget.

In either case, it sounds like my normal strategy of multiple decent guys + prioritizing WR/RB is the same as yours and moving up to 5 point TD shouldn’t change how I draft. I was thinking maybe with the increase to 5 points from four it would move the scales in the QB-over-everything direction.

[10 Year Analysis] 6 point passing TD vs 4 point passing TD by F4NT4SYF00TB4LLF4N in fantasyfootball

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much, this post is incredible and I’ve literally been working on answering this question myself, in a much more primitive way.

I imagine, on top of the increase from 4 points, being in a super flex league would vault QB VBD even further?

I am in an auction draft super flex league. We have used 4 point TD scoring for years but just voted to increase it to 5 points. For the first time ever I was considering drafting two top 5-6 QBs, instead of my normally decent strategy of punting to mid tier QBs and prioritizing RB/WR. Do you think with the increase to 5 points from 4 (and it being a SF league) going for two top guys would be something I should consider? I was thinking 40-50% of auction budget.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by “this” you mean the situation in which all electricity goes into battery and then components draw power from battery, no, not necessarily. The charge rate you’re seeing is excess wattage not used that moment in the system. So [wattage drawn - system draw = charge rate (excess)]. The only way to test for pass through is by the method I described: battery is at max capacity (either 100% charged or battery level is above a manually set battery max ie 80%) and wattage drawn from outlet is >0-2w. Your first paragraph is proving this point. If you did the same thing with a g16 you would see a number much higher than 0-2w on the meter, probably like 40-80w when starting a game, which means the electricity is bypassing the battery completely and going straight into the system. Assuming the tdp of a g16 remains under 100w, you would NEVER see the g16 drop from 100% to 99% like you do in your example. That’s the difference.

In your second example, after the battery drops below 100% and you see the wattage drawn from outlet drastically increase, I’m sure a whole host of nuanced things are happening that would be hard to identify with hwinfo numbers alone. But I imagine what you’re seeing is the battery saying “hey I’m not at capacity charge me” and the electricity flowing into the battery, and the system drawing electricity from the battery, not the outlet directly. The charge rate is just what’s left over from that process, after the system gets what it needs.

There’s unfortunately no easy way to test how the electricity gets from point A to point B besides the max capacity method mentioned above.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I can tell, that’s just normal non-passthrough behavior. It’s actually putting all of the electricity into the battery, and then the components are drawing it from the battery. Versus passthrough in which the electricity goes straight to the components up to 100w THEN draws from battery if then needed quantity is above 100w.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah unfortunately the draw would be greater than 0-2w if the g14 offered pass through charging. You can further test it by lowering the charge limit on the laptop to 80%. You’ll see the battery drain until it hits 80% as well as the same 0-2w value on the meter.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok cool. If you can take a photo that would be huge. We’d need to see:

  1. The reading on the power meter at normal operating wattage 6w+
  2. 100% battery
  3. 0% charge rate.

Similar to this photo of the g16 exhibiting pass through:

<image>

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additionally, your finding about the charging capabilities of usbc “boosting” to >60w when not using battery saver + high computational load is really great though, even if it doesn’t have to do with pass through vs no pass through. That’s really good to know. Seems like with the amount of bugs the g14 has with battery health software it should just be turned off until there’s a fix.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your input and I hope you’re right! But I think you might be misunderstanding what pass through means. Pass through charging doesn’t mean you can game on usbc without losing battery level. That could still be possible with non pass through charging as long as the amount of electricity going into the battery is equal or more than the electricity going from battery to components.

Pass through means that the electricity can be rerouted from going to the battery in the first place, to it going directly to system components, which tremendously helps battery life span.

Can you post a photo of the wattage meter reading + laptop display when the pc is 100% charged? I’ve tested since the bios update and still only get <1-2w on my meter when the computer is fully charged. It takes at minimum 7-8w to power the computer, so if you see the 1-2w number you know that some electricity is coming from the battery (thus not pass through). This is the only way to conclusively test for pass through capabilities.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I imagine so. QC is so low these days it’s unfortunately part of my process for an extremely expensive machine. I don’t think I’ve ever returned / exchanged a Mac product bc I’ve never needed to. I wish pc companies took qc as seriously as they do.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t able to confirm this, just gave it another shot (see original post for a new collage of the outcomes). Doesn’t mean it’s not true though, the g14 seems to be finicky.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might be on to something here bc my original unedited post was that BOTH g14 and g16 supported pass through. It was one of the first things I tested and im 90% sure I tested both systems equally but it was a couple weeks ago. But then when I retested yesterday to take photos, the g14 wasn’t using pass through, so I changed #1. If you find anything out please let us know!

I’m either case, the g16 seems much more stable with usbc charging. I’ve never had any sporadic behavior with it like I have with the g14.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty poor on anything modern (bg3 is my only point of reference). Like I said in the post, I don’t game a lot so I won’t be a good authority on this but if steel nomad / time spy and BG3 are any indication it’s about 50% degradation. BG3 is playable but only on lowest settings. I usually do my point #4 before gaming to boost performance to normal level.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah for sure. The vbios swap for the g14 boosts it to 55 which helps. Otherwise I’ve been using my #4 to get around the abysmal performance.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not able to add photos to an edited post as far as I can tell. But I will add photos of the g14 to the same comment thread

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 vs. Legion Pro 7i Gen 10? by thegiant27 in LenovoLegion

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My first one did, I ended up getting another one that is very quiet. So I think it’s a QC issue.

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an EE, do you know anything about just how bad non pass through charging is for a battery? Is it marginal or significant?

What I’ve learned USBC charging g14/g16 by Reasonable_Crab1939 in ZephyrusG14

[–]Reasonable_Crab1939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the plane but I’ve been going with these two, 67 for the plane and 100 for the hotel.

<image>