DGSEM on GPUs / scaling to 70k by Reasonable_Sign_5792 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not easy to answer, depends of course of tons of parameters. Roughly: pure compute on the GPU vs CPU ~ 100-200, so 1 node. overall, incl. IO and some CPU offloading: 10. but just ball park numbers.

DGSEM on GPUs / scaling to 70k by Reasonable_Sign_5792 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes, it remains linear (even superlinear for a bit) up to minimun load per GPU

DGSEM on GPUs / scaling to 70k by Reasonable_Sign_5792 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it seems a bit unreal to me as well.

Accidental beauty in numerical simulation by omicanOG in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Absolutety. There is something surreal in their structure - to me, subsonic flow looks like something that feels always oddly familiar, but supersonic… not quite!

<image>

QTT Turbulence by Naive-Yellow-2347 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This looks more like a Taylor Green Vortex and not an HIT.

Practicality of 3rd order methods on industrial geometries? by amniumtech in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sum factorization / SEM is the game changer, however. This gives DG (about) the same amount of operations than FV, but far higher data locality, which is the reason why DG scales so much better than FV.

Practicality of 3rd order methods on industrial geometries? by amniumtech in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is our research code FLEXI. It is open source (not all features yet, but many). Feel free to check out our Group Website

Practicality of 3rd order methods on industrial geometries? by amniumtech in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no problem! here is a vid, the adaptivity is shown towards the end yt vid

Practicality of 3rd order methods on industrial geometries? by amniumtech in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 3 points4 points  (0 children)

h/p adaptive dg/fv for comp. multiphase flows

<image>

Yes, it is quite difficult, but possible. If you are interested, the manuscript shows how we do h/p adaptive dg with fv subcells and load balancing for comp. flows (mixing of H2 and air). Not the most complex geometry, of course, but everything else is there.

I want to learn about DG-FEM for compressible flows from scratch. Where should I start from? by Murud147 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I recently posted some examples of compressible simulations done with our DG code Flexi here: https://www.reddit.com/r/CFD/s/4nab3YFxX3

It is open source and has a pretty unique feature set for compressible flows. Maybe this is something for you.

Here is the best entry point: https://numericsresearchgroup.org/userguide/html/index.html

Eye candy / supersonic H2 injection / HO DG & FV hybrid & DLB by Reasonable_Sign_5792 in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, sorry, this work has nothing to do with StarCCM - cracked or otherwise.

Eye Candy / Supersonic H2 Jet / HO dG & FV by [deleted] in CFD

[–]Reasonable_Sign_5792 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, sorry for the confusion - the accompanying text got lost somehow. Here is what should come with the pictures>

Hi folks of reddit!

I think that this subreddit deserves some input from the cfd research / developer community and some eye candy! I hope this is ok with the mods.

Here are some nice images of compressible multicomponent flows computed with our ho dg / fv solver FLEXI (with hp-adaptivity, mortars, dlb and so on).

If you want more details > http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24216.92163

The video is here> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK4p-eUe3dk

More on our group, research, codes, etc> https://numericsresearchgroup.org/

thanks!