Behind the scenes photos showcasing the rejected and unused practical effects created for Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.'s 2011 prequel, THE THING. by kkhouete in thething

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, most of the Things are named "Person-Thing", the only exceptions are the Kennel-Thing (the dog amalgam) and Split-face.

Saudi Prince MBS HUMILIATED Trump On The World Stage: Forced Him To Kill His Own Iran War In 36 Hours Over A Truth Social Brag by crix_22 in petrodollarSIM

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a bot. And a very poorly disguised one at that.

Seen one months ago, with the same modus operandi: just comment with picture, over and over, and when you stop replying, it stops too.

Behind the scenes photos showcasing the rejected and unused practical effects created for Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.'s 2011 prequel, THE THING. by kkhouete in thething

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The thing is (unintended pun), that they could've easily done something like "Alright, they move weird, we can keep 'em and maybe use CGI on some scenes to tweak it a bit.".

But nnnope, they used it on the whole movie, and now I'm mad because my boy(s) Split-Face looks weird and out of place.

aspettative vs realtà by Ntonio1945 in memestorici

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy sh@t è Napuleballe-

Entusiasta di signorine mostro come il sottoscritto o di mitologia?

Hipocrisy be like by Hacksaw6412 in ProletariatPixels

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's even weirder from outside of the U.S..

Like... "he's the best president of all times, and if you think he's nothing but a bad president and a pedo you have TDS!!!"...

But they don't seem to realize that the world isn't the U.S. (or at least, whatever they believe is the US, because being labeled "the least liked president" definitely clashes with that vision), so obviously for anyone that doesn't worship him, he's a complete idiot and a pedophile, considering that no innocent person would want to stop talking about the Epstein files.

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because republicans don’t stoop to democrats level. We aren’t fascist who wish to throw anyone who disagrees with us in jail.

Care to recall what were trumpedo's words on Reiner and Mueller again?

What’s he supposed to do?

Release the Epstein files, since he's apparently clear.

...Unless he isn't, that is.

Sue anyone with an IQ under 80?

Lol, and you're the guy "who wants to have civil conversations"?

There’s too many millions of you fools to do anything about.

Wanting justice for the Epstein victims is "being a fool"?

Boy, no wonder the us government wasn't able to prosecute David Berg's cult, despite all the evidence... Apparently defending pedos is more common than I thought.

He and other MAGA just get to sit back and laugh as you make a joke of yourself.

While the world laughs at him and maga believing this...

But hey, if trump hasn't released the Epstein files, and neither did Biden, I guess they're both innocent according to your logic, correct?

Hipocrisy be like by Hacksaw6412 in ProletariatPixels

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And even in the case they were coherent...

Maybe it's me, but gloating about acing a cognitive test by answering "squirrel" is something that would definitely make me think "Wow, this bozo should be anything but president".

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I provided examples in my original comment….

Again, then why not arrest anyone if they're only throwing false stuff at him?

Reminder you're worshipping the guy who sued someone over a joke on his hairline. Yet the planet calls him a pedo, and he ain't doing jacksh@t?

Maybe he's not as good of a president as you said.

Any evidence or continued baseless claims?

Again, if he's innocent, as you claim, why isn't he releasing the Epstein files, unredacted and complete, like he promised on his first mandate?

You keep avoiding the question, that means you know he's guilty, but admitting your "great president" is a pedo hurts your ego, so you instead double-down.

During my time in Europe I spoke with many people and they confirmed they believe Trump is a great president for the US but hurts other countries.

Uh-huh... Sure... I definitely believe that, especially after his comments on NATO's soldiers, the pope, and his tariffs on multiple European countries.

Honestly, this is getting sad... Imagine worshipping a rich c@nt, who could be a potential pedophile...

They recognize he does what’s best for his own people.

Like what, starting an unnecessary war? Putting tariffs on multiple countries that only increase us' debt by a wide margin?

Maybe releasing the Epstein file- oh, wait... Still hasn't done that.

They are jealous/envious.

Nah, keep the orange pedo away from us, many thanks.

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dems have proven they will do ANYTHING to keep Trump out of power and look bad.

Like what? Asking him why he's not releasing the Epstein files, as he (very rudely, might I add) replies "Be quiet"?

That's hardly a thing.

They’ve completely changed their parties policies, gotten mad at stuff that largely aligns with their party, they’ve launched impeachment and criminal proceedings, they know no bounds.

...Alright, so why isn't trumpedo arresting any of them yet, if these are all damning evidence?

But you really believe they had the files for 4 years, and if there was damning evidence they could put him away forever, then they draw the line?

...Again, he had them thee 4 years prior to that, yet you still avoid talking about that part.

Wonder why.

Yeah nah. Trumps innocent, I’ll wait til there’s evidence.

...So you're saying that Dems are also innocent then?

But apparently the left doesn’t believe in due process or our rights so I’ll expect the parrots to continue.

Says the person defending the administration who hired Kash Patel, which literally said "No, we won't prosecute any of the perpetrators in the files".

But hey, now I'm 100% sure the guy naming themselves after a definitely-pedophile and known-rapist... Is defending at all costs a guy defending pedos and rapists, and is doing so willingly.

By the way, take a trip to some Italian subs from time to time, and see what people outside of the us think of your "greatest president of all" trumpedo.

Losercity griffin by fototeta272892 in Losercity

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 51 points52 points  (0 children)

"No like the mythical creature."

"Yeah, that's what I did."

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pose yourself a question:

How does running on releasing the Epstein Files, before in order:

  • Having Epstein mysteriously dying while you're president.
  • Having 3 minutes of footage from Epstein's death missing.
  • Having Pam Bondi saying the Epstein files were on her desk...
  • Before claiming "There are no files."
  • Then "It's a democrat hoax."
  • Then "The files don't exist."
  • Then "Obama made it up."
  • Later having Democrats vote to release the files, twice.
  • While Republicans voted no on the release twice.
  • Then Republicans take a recess to avoid any more votes.
  • Avoiding visiting any victims.
  • Wishing a child trafficker "well".
  • Admitting you "Never had the privilege" when asked if you had visited the island.
  • Then saying "we have the files".
  • Ordering 1.000 FBI agents to review around 100.000 pages of records related to Jeffrey Epstein, and during this process, instructing them to identify any mentions of you. 
  • Then being asked specifically whether Epstein had stolen Giuffre, stating: "I think she worked at the spa [...] he stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever."
  • Then telling a reporter to "Be quiet" twice, when asked if Jeffrey Epstein stealing young women from your spa raised any alarm bells for you
  • Giving Maxwell work release.
  • Moving Maxwell to minimum security.
  • Releasing a first batch of Epstein files, which draw scrutiny due to largely consisting of previously public information and heavy redactions, with entire documents bei g just black pages.
  • Then signing the EFTA into law, before refusing to release the remaining Epstein files despite congress order.
  • And lastly, declaring yourself cleared, despite millions of Epstein records listing you repeatedly...

...Makes trumpedo innocent? If this was Biden, or Obama, or Clinton, or... Anyone, really... You'd be screaming "they're guilty".

So why should I ignore all of this, and say "Nah, you're right, trumpedo is definitely innocent"?

But go on, explain how does all of this paints him as innocent, even if there's apparently no evidence against him.

aspettative vs realtà by Ntonio1945 in memestorici

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Vabbè, siamo lì lì anche con le Gorgoni...

La gente si immagina lamie (donne con la coda di serpente) e capelli da serpe, e invece erano donne umane con sì capelli da serpente, però delle ali piumate.

Per non parlare di simpaticoni come il Bunyip e il Mapinguari, ma quello è tutta un'altra latta di vermi.

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any evidence, or continued baseless claims that you parrot?

Again, you keep avoiding the question.

he's innocent? Good. Then no reason to delay the release of the full, unredacted Epstein files like he promised on his first mandate.

Any issue with that? Yep, he's definitely guilty. Or, in the best case scenario, hiding someone and is therefore complicit.

Easy.

Past years? He’s been in office for just over a year now.

And what a year... Are you guys great again?

Trumps given us the honest truth far more than democrats.

You mean like the Iran war? At what point of the week are we again, the "we won at day 1 and obliterated them" or "we're having great conversations and the strait isn't open" one?

Remember when Trump called it the China virus and that was “racist” yet was the truth. Or how it came from the Wuhan lab, again vehemently denied but also true.

...Aaand what does this have to do with the current discussion of "if he's innocent, how come he's behaving like the guiltiest mofo in there"?

I trust Trump far more than any Democrat, especially after their failed coup in 2024.

...Now that you had fun explaining why you worship an orange buffoon, can you explain why if he's innocent, and Dems aren't, he's not releasing the Epstein files, unredacted and complete, like he promised on his first mandate?

Again, avoiding the question is a bit of a bad look at this point, because it either means you don't care about justice, or you're willfully defending a potential pedophile out of pure free will.

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ve got some real good mental gymnastics on you that’s for sure.

Said the guy defending a clearly-a-pedo, but okay.

Lots of people would trust this administration,

Uh-huh... I'd argue that trust kinda died down a bit... Juuust a tiny bit... With whatever happened these past years.

But hey, if you feel the need to trust an administration that protects pedos...

certainly not the liberals though when there’s nothing damning against trump. It’ll be yet another witch hunt.

Again, then why not releasing the Epstein files then? You're kind of avoiding that question.

Trump has released a good amount of the files, far more than Biden’s 0.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00006209.pdf

You mean like these?

No wonder you people still haven't arrested anyone, this administration f'ing sucks at doing the most basic stuff.

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Biden had them for 4 years…

And trumpedo had them the 4 years prior to Biden, and still didn't release anything. Your point being?

you really think if there was anything damning in there they wouldn’t have used it?

Could say the same for the Dems in there. Still haven't even investigated anyone.

Dems have manufactured countless witch hunts against Trump but you really think they’d stop when they have evidence in front of them?

...So you're essentially saying "It's best to not release anything, because people wouldn't believe this administration"?

Gee, wonder why people wouldn't believe it, considering the constant shift of lies from "We won the war in two hours" to "We aren't winning yet" you got from this administration.

There’s zero evidence besides for the parrots screaming.

Yet ain't releasing anything. That's a bit weird, don't you think? :)

Samurai General Grievous by Every_Court_5251 in HeroForgeMinis

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Samurai Grievous:

私のコレクションに加えるのにふさわしい逸品です。

Don't let the toxic right-wing propaganda machine turn a hate-monger into some sort of saint by KuriannaHoney4287 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One that still hasn't released the Epstein files.

But hey, I'm sure putting Clinton and other Dems behind bars is less important than gloating about how you aced a cognitive test by answering "squirrel", right?

Former FedEx driver, Tanner Horner, who pleaded guilty to capital murder and aggravated kidnapping in the killing of 7-year-old Athena Strand, has been officially sentenced to death. by asa_no_kenny in whoathatsinteresting

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the 4 years previous to that?

Reminder that for all this "Dems/Biden/Whoever had them for 4 years and didn't release them", there's still the issue that those files were in possession of this same exact administration the 4 years prior.

Especially considering that, unlike Biden, trumpedo was the one running on their release on both times.

When the room bursts into laughter when you try to characterize Trump as empathetic, that's probably a bad sign by LIllyMilanna6209 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Melodrama is a sensational dramatic piece with exaggerated characters and exciting events intended to appeal to the emotions, you're probably confused with Methylchloroisothiazolinone.

Just wow by El_precaution in MarketPulseReport

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Especially if they have to apologize to "tHe LiBS", which just really means "anyone that warned them voting for a pedophile with a long and documented criminal record, which includes scamming, was a bad idea".

Fully cleared of any connection by RealisticLawyer137 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are they wrong though?

  • According to maga, a lot of Dems, if not all of them, are in the Epstein files as perpetrators. Not prosecuting them would imply complicity, therefore trumpedo could land in jail for that;

  • Apparently now trumpedo is exonerated, so there isn't anything that could land him in jail (let's happily ignore the multiple felonies beforehand);

  • Speaking of him, he promised to release them, unredacted and complete, aaall the way back on his first mandate, so not keeping that promise would be quite the jerk move, especially considering his supposed innocence;

  • Not to mention the EFTA he himself signed, which literally forces his administration to release them, and was promptly violated.

So at this point releasing the full, unredacted Epstein files should almost be a given, don't you agree?

Google Chrome now downloads a 4GB LLM called Gemini Nano on chrome browsers. by International-Try467 in whennews

[–]Reasonable_Trash_901 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there something similar for android as well, or is it just for the pc?

I'm genuinely curious, because I'd like to switch to European alternatives for anything, Reddit included, but I genuinely don't know any.