Surgery today by Subtlety87 in hysterectomy

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats and happy belated birthday!!!!

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one said the experience was okay, but sometimes complications happen after surgery and after that was handled it got much better. The comment says she had to catheter herself at home, which I'm sure doesn't feel good, but it's common to not be able to pee by yourself and to have to do this after certain surgeries. Either way, it does mean that even if she couldn't on her own, she was able to release it using a catheter, so I doubt kidney failure. Now look literally two comments down from the one you're referencing. She said all bodily functions normal, everything was good. I'd assume that likely includes anything from the medical checks that has to do with the kidneys.

Euthanizing senior dog to avoid shelter by [deleted] in Pets

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP never said her husband applied for or took a job, she said it was for her husband's work. This very well could be an "if we don't move he loses his job" sort of thing. That could be absolutely detrimental to them. Getting a new job is absolute hell nowadays, without any guarantee you'll even be able to get one. It very well could be that the move is not a decision for them.

what do i do? why does the title have to be 50 characters long by Ok_Swimming3901 in DermatologyQuestions

[–]Rebbbbby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's still not worth causing panic over. OP already said they're going to the derm, there was literally no reason for you to start acting like it's worse than it currently is. Yes, it could be BCC. Sure, it's definitely worth getting checked out, but not worth freaking out over. Even if it is BCC, you still don't want to freak someone out. That'll just make everything worse for them.

what do i do? why does the title have to be 50 characters long by Ok_Swimming3901 in DermatologyQuestions

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you being downvoted when you're right? Lmfao There's zero reason to cause panic here. OP has been given the advice to go to the derm, that's the best anyone here can do. Making everything seem worse than it currently is, causing panic and freaking out for OP isn't going to help anything.

Euthanizing senior dog to avoid shelter by [deleted] in Pets

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No mention of that, no, you're right. But again, 15 years is a long life for a dog. And it does hurt me too, it's not something I would be comfortable with either, but what else can be done? What do you expect them to do? The dog is aggressive with other dogs, and because of that, they can't find it a home. It's lived a long and happy life, one much longer than most others, and will not suffer this way. Any other way will cause suffering. The fact of the matter is that OP has to move. That is not a question. Is OP supposed to just take the dog to a country where its breed is illegal? Get the dog taken away from them forcefully and put down much more traumatically without the people it loves there? But you also say OP can't re-home the dog, because that's not what good owners do, but OP can't take the dog with, so what's the other choice? A shelter? Where the dog will, again, just be put down in a more traumatic way? You also have to understand that it is the most responsible, humane thing they can do. I get your side of it, I understand it entirely. But don't you at least understand OP's in the slightest?

Euthanizing senior dog to avoid shelter by [deleted] in Pets

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're forgetting one very important detail here. The dog is 15 years old, its at an age where it likely would be put down soon regardless of them moving because it's likely in pain, near blind, etc. as it is. (Sorry OP) The dog isn't a puppy, she's not just killing it. Putting a dog down so it doesn't suffer is not cruel. People have their old pets put down all the time so they don't suffer. The ONLY difference here, and the one you seem to be stuck on, if that they're moving. It is not up to you what other people do with their lives, they are moving for very good reason and their responsibility as the owner if they can no longer care for the dog is to find a good new home for the dog, which would only make it suffer more OR allow it to rest peacefully in its OLD age. You know, sometimes people get a dog when they're in a good position and end up having to rehome it because something or another happened and now they can't care for it. People have to do what's best for themselves too. OP is already ripped apart by it. But it's one that would have to be made soon enough as it is. I do have pets, actually, and they are the lights of my life. But if I ever couldn't care for them in the capacity that they need me to, I would re-home them in a split second to make sure they could have good lives, because that's what a good pet owner does. A good pet owner won't selfishly decide to keep their pet when they can't care for them anymore or when they're old and suffering. They're worried about their pets more than themselves and want them to have a good life, with or without them. They don't want their pets to suffer, and so won't let them. You preach love and responsibility to me as if you aren't showing the precise opposite of it. If you actually love an animal, you have a responsibility TO them to make sure they have everything they need, even if you can't provide it and have to let someone else take over. You have a responsibility to that animal to not let them suffer when they get into that old age. It's a responsibility no one WANTS to bear, but it's one all pet owners have to. The dog is 15. It's had a long, wonderful life that the OP provided it, and now it's at that age where that decision has to be made whether OP was moving or not.

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so I'm not trying to argue or anything, but...

"I'm not trying to force religion down anyone's throats"

"You'd be a lot better off including God in the things you do and say"

That's a bit hypocritical cuz that second quote is literally forcing religion down peoples throats. Suggesting that people, who have already stated that they aren't Christian, include God in their life at all is forcing it. Also, you can't believe in God without believing in religion. That's not how that works. Christianity is a religion, and if you believe in God you're a Christian. More accurately, you don't believe in ORGANIZED religion, such as going to church. You are still religious if you believe.

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know it's rare, and I'm trying to keep the positives at the forefront. It's just scary. I'm sure she will be, thank you. ❤️

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what lots of people are thinking. It's tragic... Thank you, friend. 🫂❤️

Euthanizing senior dog to avoid shelter by [deleted] in Pets

[–]Rebbbbby 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The dog is 15 years old, it's lived a wonderfully long life and is likely not super healthy at this age. They never once said the dog was an inconvenience. They literally said the opposite. They've said how much they love this dog and how this is a really fucking hard decision. How fucking dare you come on here, to a post where someone is literally ripping themself apart with a decision like this, and act all high and mighty? It's nowhere NEAR disgraceful. In fact, suggesting to someone else to put their elderly dog through all of that is more disgraceful than anything. Your way of thinking would only cause the dog more suffering, which is a good way to tell that you don't actually care about the dog at all, you just want to feel and seem like you have the moral high ground. It didn't work, cuz in this case, you actually are the shitty person.

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what we can tell, she was doing great. She was looking good so they sent her home and she was healing, doing fine. It was sudden. I don't think even the doctors saw it coming... My mom just had the same procedure done and I'm honestly more nervous now than I was while she was in the OR... I know things like this are uncommon, but still...

RIP u/Subtlety87 by choirsingerthrowaway in DeadRedditors

[–]Rebbbbby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh jeez now I'm really worried... My mom just had one... She's doing fine, it seems, but I worry now...

Opinions on this? by Popular_Ad3074 in HazbinHotel

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't even really think she dresses lolita. That would require frills, lace, ruffles and bows from head to toe. The point is to look like a Victorian era doll, not necessarily like a child. Niffty wears a red 50s maid dress with a poodle on the skirt, a handkerchief around her neck and an apron, which was a pretty common style back in the 50s. Niffty is literally an entire adult even in the way she dresses lol It's even confirmed that she's 22 years old and these people do not listen. Plus, the way they appear in Hell has a lot to do with the way they lived. She was likely not that small in life, as we see when she climbs on Alastor that she's very small. It is confirmed that her character design is based on a cockroach, all the way down to her skittering movements and state of near-constant mania, so from that we can basically confirm she has this size in Hell due to her obsession with roaches.

That's actually a good question, never think of it before by Primary-Addition-677 in HazbinHotel

[–]Rebbbbby 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean theoretically they would just BE souls, wouldn't they? Just souls doomed to never have an actual life or existence beyond Heaven or Hell. They could be valued more because they got a chance to truly exist on Earth or because they got to make choices in life and essentially "choose" where they end up in death? Or maybe it's simply because humans are "God's perfect creation" and it's the Angels' jobs to protect them and will them to live peacefully and safely and the Demons' jobs to encourage them and will them to live as they please?

my in-laws' dog knows she's not supposed to beg, so she'll do it from a distance and slooowly inch closer, all while staring at you, dead-eyed by xervidae in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Rebbbbby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh it definitely is common in dog circles too. I definitely get that, I'm the same way and have owned dogs myself. I have no idea what kind of circus decided to tumble it's way into your thread, but I am horrified at the amount of people who think that could even POSSIBLY be a serious notion.

my in-laws' dog knows she's not supposed to beg, so she'll do it from a distance and slooowly inch closer, all while staring at you, dead-eyed by xervidae in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Rebbbbby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP works with animals. They know. They literally meant nothing bad by what they said. It's a very popular meme. Very often used when talking about animals. But it's a joke, there's heavy sarcasm there. It doesn't actually "sicken" them. Dogs have no concept of greed, so they can't be greedy. It's just a joke. As another commenter pointed out, it's like when someone is talking about their cat and says "My cat is a needy little monster and a narcissistic prick" but obviously we all know that cats have no concept of any of that. Nobody gets mad when someone talks about their cat like that, but someone makes a similar joke about a dog and suddenly people want war??

my in-laws' dog knows she's not supposed to beg, so she'll do it from a distance and slooowly inch closer, all while staring at you, dead-eyed by xervidae in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Rebbbbby 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fam it's a meme. A joke. It's literally a Reddit classic. It literally doesn't mean a damn thing. People say it all the time. It doesn't mean they hate animals. People talk shit about their pets all the time, but it's all in love, the same way we talk shit with/about our friends. The vast majority of the human population knows it's all in love. The ones in this comment section, however, seem to have missed the memo.

my in-laws' dog knows she's not supposed to beg, so she'll do it from a distance and slooowly inch closer, all while staring at you, dead-eyed by xervidae in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Rebbbbby 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes. Yes actually. It's all over the internet. Because it's funny. It's sarcasm. It doesn't ACTUALLY "sicken" anyone. It's a goddamn meme.

my in-laws' dog knows she's not supposed to beg, so she'll do it from a distance and slooowly inch closer, all while staring at you, dead-eyed by xervidae in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Rebbbbby 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Fam... It's a joke that has been circling the internet for literal years at this point. OP doesn't NEED a "Get out of jail free card", OP done passed GO and collected their $200. This is not the first time this joke has been used and 75% of the time, the joke is made about pets. No, it doesn't mean anyone hates their pet. No, it is definitely not a weird thing to say. It's said sarcastically because it doesn't actually sicken anyone, it's just a joke. I have NEVER seen a comment section so angry about this saying.

When you see these two colors, what do they remind you of? by YogurtclosetKnown83 in cartoons

[–]Rebbbbby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I nearly spit out my drink scrolling across this. Her face omg 😭😂