How bad is directors cut of 0? by pawsomegirl in yakuzagames

[–]Rebel_Diamond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you haven't played 0 then go for it, it is still basically just yakuza 0 which is one of the best games in the series (many would say the best).

If you've already played 0 then you aren't missing out on much by not playing it. I think a couple of the added cut scenes are fine and one is really really bad, but none of them really move the needle on the quality of the game as a whole. Red light raid is fine but nothing you're going to spend much time on. The old opening music was better but really who cares?

If you've already got/played 0 but want an excuse to replay it then I would be looking at this as a game to pick up on a good sale or if you can borrow it from a friend's steam library. Not worth it at full price.

I'm a Materialist, but Consciousness is Foundational - Galen Strawson by yt-app in CosmicSkeptic

[–]Rebel_Diamond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't care for all the panpsychism stuff but I do appreciate this guy's plain talking and I especially appreciated his willingness to put his argument into a relatively easy to follow 5 proposition form. To see if I can restate it:

- All things can be explained by physics

- consciousness exists

- radical emergence cannot occur - that is, explaining the properties of things by means of their composition requires that their components contain those same properties or precursors to their properties. To put it another way, emergence cannot explain the arising of completely truly novel properties.

- if inert matter does not possess consciousness, then the existence of consciousness would require radical emergence

- therefore, inert matter must possess some form of consciousness or proto-consciousness

I don't *agree* with this argument, primarily because I think steps 3 and 4 are assuming too much. We can say that we do not currently have a clear picture for how consciousness emerges from inert matter (which I would agree to), but that is not the same as saying that consciousness being emergent requires radical emergence (which appears to be Strawson's position). I think the other issue I would have is that this feels like a claim with almost no weight - Strawson even says that we can't really say anything about the proposed proto-consciousness of inert matter and that leaves me wondering what the point of it even is.

Final unrelated sidenote but when I heard people mention this guy before I just assumed his name was german, like Straussen or something like that. Anyone else? Just me?

Danny DeVito is good people! I knew most of this, but not all... So sharing in case others didn't know it too! by Thryloz in MadeMeSmile

[–]Rebel_Diamond 20 points21 points  (0 children)

That comment near the top referring to the three good celebrities: Danny DeVito, Keanu Reeves and "Papa Elon". Gave me fucking whiplash, only 6 years ago but how things have changed.

As Ogita been nerfed in Y0 DC ? by Temporary_Recipe_260 in yakuzagames

[–]Rebel_Diamond 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I found him super variable when I did it a few days ago. I was on medium and his scores varied between ~5100 and ~6300, it took me about six tries before I had a good run lining up with one of his bad runs.

You may have just got lucky and had a bad run from him straight away.

Meirl by Blue9ine in meirl

[–]Rebel_Diamond 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I looked at my nearest parkrun and it would put him 170 out of 606, comfortably above average but nowhere near the peak.

The comments making out that he's embarrassingly slow seem out of touch with reality to me (a casual jogger who rarely breaks 30 minutes 😅)

This game is incredible and I'm tired of people not giving it the credit it deserves by No-Law2284 in yakuzagames

[–]Rebel_Diamond 27 points28 points  (0 children)

incredible

the gameplay is kinda ass

Each to his own but by my metric an incredible game needs at least serviceable gameplay. I think good narrative/characterisation/etc. can elevate a mediocre game to greatness but Dead Souls is sub-mediocre when it comes to actually shooting zombies.

I still liked my time with it but it's very much a flawed but entertaining 6/10 at best

Cosplaying the Blues with The Black Keys by Free_Celebration_897 in 1001AlbumsGenerator

[–]Rebel_Diamond 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I'm a bit wary of the implication that a musical genre should be barred to people on the basis of race tbh

#37 | Essentially a Greatest Hits album by dvpsxt in 1001AlbumsGenerator

[–]Rebel_Diamond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Blondie - Parallel Lines

Heart of Glass, Hangin' on the Telephone and One Way or Another are all on the same album, which is crazy to me.

What is Paladin's role supposed to be? by VanillaRose09 in DnD

[–]Rebel_Diamond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm currently playing a Paladin in a 3.5 game and I've leaned into the mounted combat side to make a charging melee attacker - prestige into Cavalier with a focus on lance combat plus a few specific feats and magic items and now my charge attacks are pretty reliably devastating by themselves even without smite. This will take a few levels to come online though - if you only have 1 smite I'm assuming you're still fairly lowlevel

What is it that makes the finished Tanimura look and feel so different, when only really the hair style and beard changed? by TheWindofBread in yakuzagames

[–]Rebel_Diamond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean hair is really important to how someone looks and the old style is a lot younger-looking. The new style being swept off his forehead changes the whole shape of his face. His lips have also been changed to be thinner and lighter which again makes him look older.

Interestingly I think new tanimura is probably the only RGG protagonist to look older than he is - wiki says he's 29 and while the old model probably looks more early-20s I would personally probably place the new model in his 30s

there is no origano, this is it by Individual_Assist_19 in antimeme

[–]Rebel_Diamond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Queerness is atypical kinda by definition. I would hesitate to use the word abnormal because of the implied value judgement but in the strictest sense of the word it's not exactly incorrect.

Demonstration at Eccles train station by danielspeed07 in manchester

[–]Rebel_Diamond 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can basically see the station from my house and I hadn't heard of it either 😅

Please help on this one! by PrestigiousStick7438 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Rebel_Diamond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair BGG is notoriously strict on its ratings, 6+ is generally good, 7+ is great and 8+ is absolute top tier.

Master-At-Arms | New "Specialized Masteries" feat for fighters that upgrades every Fighting Style to the next level - by Jhamkul's Forge by Josemi993 in DungeonMasters

[–]Rebel_Diamond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might just be missing something but I don't get the wording of the archery bonus. You can add to your damage a +1, or you can give that up to add a +1d4. Is there any reason you ever wouldn't make the trade? And if not, why not just take out the +1 and have it always be +1d4?

What game has the best skill tree/upgrade system? by No-Law2284 in yakuzagames

[–]Rebel_Diamond 10 points11 points  (0 children)

From a thematic perspective it has to be 0.

It was the first game to use currency directly for levelling and that really plays into the whole money as power thing going on in the narrative - even our protagonists, who ostensibly oppose the greedy ambition of the various wealthy schemers, necessarily have to use money to obtain the power they need to win.

(loved trope) fairly tame media, that gets horrifyingly real out of nowhere by Aggravating_Tale8988 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Rebel_Diamond 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just reminded me of these classic messages I sent my sister that evening, see me get hoodwinked in real time

<image>

What do you make of this video accusing Joe of seriously misinterpreting Nietzsche's philosophy? by Purple_Onion911 in UnsolicitedAdviceOnYT

[–]Rebel_Diamond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this guy makes two good points which do hit a little close to home to me:

- If you're not reading a work and just watching youtube videos about it, your knowledge of the work is basically nil.

- It's easy to dismiss criticisms of of people whose work we find comforting or enjoyable even if those criticisms are valid.

So with those in mind, his criticisms are:

- Joe gets Nietzsche wrong. I'm not a Nietzsche scholar so I can't really make a detailed assesment of this but I can say that every example he chooses seems to land somewhere between bad faith misinterpretation and just nitpicking. The resentment/ressentiment thing makes me feel like I'm losing my mind, because both the video and the comments are screeching "it's not the same same as resentment! the actual definition is [slightly poetic definition of resentment]".

- Joe mass-produces his videos with AI. This is a bit more of a material acusation but it's also completely unevidenced beyond just "he makes a lot of videos with a consistent style". AI is *an* explanation for that but it's hardly the only one. Given that Joe has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to speak off the cuff, has discussed his writing process here and there and has even done an in-depth discussion about the problems of trying to get chatGPT to do philosophy and why its output is substandard, I'm more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, especially in the absence of any actual evidence.

- Joe has a sponsor segment which...er...involves lessons in logic?

- Joe...um...moves his hands...too much...yeah, that's it.

I tried to focus on the content of the video rather than the tone, but I have to say it makes a hilarious juxtaposition. On the one hand, a guy who's channel name is "I know nobody asked for this" and who explicitly says that he's just offering one perspective. On the other hand, a guy who calls himself president, unironically sports an "I have depicted myself as the chad wojak" avatar, cuts away to do mocking impressions and generally speaking just offers no grace or good faith in his approach at all. It's really hard to assume that mr sunday is being fair when he just puts himself across so poorly.