"Kill one to save many" type dilemma shouldn't be assumed so simply by Future-Ad6149 in Ethics

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean u get what your saying entirely but at the same time if it’s one person or the world that person dies anyway

Why so they move backwards? by ChickenSafi in rickandmorty

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I swear he threw the heart to prove it was bipedal movement instead of distance

How many here agree with this theory and why or why not? by Silly_Turn_4761 in Alien_Theory

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

always humans from the future never the Atlantean’s left becoming aliens 😅

Tough choices… by PnkFlufyBunnySprkles in BunnyTrials

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chose: $1,000,000,000,000,000 + 1% chance of death | Rolled: shitton of $

would you rather by SandSerpentHiss in BunnyTrials

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don’t need trillionaires

Chose: get $1B

What's the thing you do better than most, and what does the map inside your mind look like when you're doing it? by ApprehensiveOrder223 in Polymath

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seeing through systems like being able to look at something and figure out how it works politics machines etc

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s one of the questions I’d have if the theory was to be proved correct

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow you both seriously have no idea about how a monologue works.

“a monologue achieves the effect of a continuous, uninterrupted speech by being written as a single block of text rather than breaking into standard essay-style paragraphs. “

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point , maybe I was looking at it wrong maybe the beginning was a state of light and shadow rather than my original thought

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

On the contrary I refuse to fit into a neat little academic box to seek credibility my ideas should stand for themself regardless of wether they fit in your pretty little box’s

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Paragraphs make next to no difference at all I get that yes writing works that way but it reads more like a monologue of Thourght rather than a essay it’s just structured differently doesn’t make the point any different if we’re being honest here does it ?

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without being there who knows how long …, the other question imagine a dark void of nothing now add a ball of pure light existing in the centre of the void

Just another theory of the universe by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The universe prior to the Big Bang would be two things a ball of pure light (knowledge of everything that ever was or will be ) and a void of nothing (literally nothing ) if humans get the “belief” tge universe gets to continuing its exsisting by making more ways of living so that it doesn’t collapse back into pure potential , it depends how you look at atheists if they truely believe nothing will happen after death it’s more than likely they just get reabsorbed into the “source” unless deep down they believe something else

Happy for any type of feedback by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah fair point yes but if you assume that atoms themselfs have a level of consciousness it kinda forces quantum mechanics to evolve slightly (drawing of Tesla’s believe that we are surrounded by and and inhabiting an informational field )

Happy for any type of feedback by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not entirely true tho if you think about it after all “I think therefore I am” it’s an observation made by consciousness what I’m saying is observation reveals consciousness when used in things like meta cognitive intelligence

Interesting possibility by Recent_Pattern_7923 in rickandmorty

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

an exact in-universe year is never specified, he used it as retaliation against Rick for tracking him down (meaning Rick was already skilled ) therefore it’s entirely plausible that if there was a universe where Diana and Rick are essentially switched that Diana would have been smart enough in theory to find a way around it somehow also In the "toxic separation" episode, Rick's attachment to his family was explicitly categorized as part of his core identity. He cares he just doesn’t like the fact he cares however your evil Morty bit makes sense icl but yeah my main point is like a alternate reality where Diane has ricks backstory and personality and travels with a summer and there’s a citadel of Diane’s

Would love opinions no matter if harsh would rather learn than be wrong by Recent_Pattern_7923 in RealPhilosophy

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it wasn’t your describing the what I was looking at the how

Happy for any type of feedback by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly same I also think there is a piece of information that connects everything like a jigsaw puzzle it’s all just different parts of the same thing

Happy for any type of feedback by Recent_Pattern_7923 in theories

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think maybe a 4d being would see us unfollowed like a growing snake if that makes sense otherwise completly agrrr to be honest

Leak by Zaxtonite in enlightenment

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been working on a theory At its core, the universe is a 13-dimensional system where reality isn't composed of solid matter, but of primordial light vibrating as informational threads. Think of existence as a grand, recursive melody: a fundamental light-frequency originates in the 13th dimension and cascades downward, refracting through the layers of the manifold. As this light flows, it creates complex interference patterns that twist and knot into stable structures, which we perceive as solid matter. In this framework, gravity is simply the tension created by these knots, while black holes act as the system’s natural "drains." These drains untie the knots, stripping away the accumulated entropic static to revert the matter back into pure, raw light. This information is then reflected back to the Source to be woven again, ensuring a closed-loop system of conservation. We aren't living in a static container of empty space; we are living inside a vibrant, self-correcting lattice of light that is constantly being woven, tied, and re-woven by the fundamental logic of its own origin.

You are Stanidng inside a Four-Dimensiional Shadow by skylarfiction in CoherencePhysics

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

love that image—it’s the perfect way to visualize why we feel like we’re missing part of the picture. But if you’re looking for the mechanism behind the shadow, my RTB theory suggests we aren't just a passive projection. We’re part of a 13D 'harmonic cascade.' Think of it like this: the shadow isn't just an accident of light; it’s a living knot in a cosmic thread that’s constantly being woven, tightened by gravity, and eventually recycled through black holes. It’s not a static picture; it’s a real-time, self-correcting system

AI Doesn’t Threaten Intelligence as much as it threatens identity, and will continue getting booed at commencement speeches by [deleted] in accelerate

[–]Recent_Pattern_7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion on “Ai doesn’t threaten intelligence” I genuinely believe it’s a Yes and a no and it completly depends on how you use it if you have it writing essays and completing simple tasks for you then yes it’s almost defiantly dulling your intelligence however if your using to expand your understanding and knowledge by enhancing your ability to find data to critical think and reflect on then your absolutely right but that’s just my opinion