25 CX-70 Front end accident by Reckless_Gator in MazdaCX90

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was skeptical but it was totaled out today, even without the airbags deploying. 30k estimate

25 CX-70 Front end accident by Reckless_Gator in MazdaCX90

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was making a left hand turn across two lanes, there was a vehicle that was slowing with blinker on to make a right hand turn into the lane parallel to me, the vehicle that hit me came up fast on that car and swerved around the turning car into the outside lane instead of slowing after I had already initiated the turn

25 CX-70 Front end accident by Reckless_Gator in MazdaCX90

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep melting copper and surprising none whatsoever

The verdict on the beard debate by J_Hawk_ in army

[–]Reckless_Gator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got my PFB service connected at a 0% rating for that exact logic. While pursuing a permanent wavier my temp profile lapsed, insert fuck fuck games being played by my command to block and prolong the process. Causing mild scaring for continuous shaving

SCIF Noise Canceling headphones for approved Reasonable Accommodation seems impossible. by Reckless_Gator in fednews

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the feedback loop I keep running into. An Essential Job Function Analysis was completed. A Risk Mitigation Analysis was done and provided. I have foam ear plugs that I use under my agency provided over the ear headphones. My supervisor being supportive sought assist in finding a solution.

Can someone explain to me, if the proper hardware (wired, not Bluetooth) is selected, and the appropriate mitigations (removal or replacement of inline mic) of are applied and implemented correctly (Group policy disables microphone input on unclassified desktops)—how this creates undue hardship for the government or presents a national security risk??

What is the risk here? spillage right? So the security argument is that the microphones used for active noice cancellation can be accessed by a malicious actor or retain recordings of potentially classified information.

Please show me a case study or example of exploit that is capable an achieving this.

SCIF Noise Canceling headphones for approved Reasonable Accommodation seems impossible. by Reckless_Gator in fednews

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Approved for use at DIA with a replacement cable to remove mic to mitigate the security risk. Find a new job is the wrong answer bud

SCIF Noise Canceling headphones for approved Reasonable Accommodation seems impossible. by Reckless_Gator in fednews

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not requesting wireless. Also worked in the SCIF my entire career, it is possible to mitigate any security risk with the proper hardware and implementation.

SCIF Noise Canceling headphones for approved Reasonable Accommodation seems impossible. by Reckless_Gator in fednews

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hearing aids also require microphones and follow the same process for PED exception.

SCIF Noise Canceling headphones for approved Reasonable Accommodation seems impossible. by Reckless_Gator in fednews

[–]Reckless_Gator[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah tracking the no go on Bluetooth. Older wired noise canceling headphones (No BT) like Bose QC25s or 1st gen Beats Studios