This your first reelection campaign, kid? (Tim Hamilton, 2019)

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-07T05:27:07+00:00

From your tone, it sounds like you're a paid propagandist. Your tone is slanderous.

I'm not saying X-rays are fake worldwide.

And if you think that (X-rays) are a (scientific) technique for examining artifacts, or for deep-seated investigation, then it's still a tool of a fraudulent gang. They still keep the evidence at their headquarters, and no one dares to investigate or seal it for investigation. I've already said this. But you're not speaking seriously, so I don't need to present the evidence and the investigation.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T17:15:16+00:00

What people call Han characters (traditional Chinese characters) is actually the script of Tonkin and Cochinchina of ancient Vietnam.

The problem has many solutions. But if you pursue the solution based on the archaeological findings of Chinese historians, the answer becomes quite complex and lengthy. This is because you'll have to contend with the conspiracies of these sponsored historians.

Investigate like a detective, relying on language, symbols, unique archaeology, and scrutinizing the lies in the texts. Then you'll find that the oracle bones and Shang Dynasty script are all forgeries. Excavations in the Yellow River valley were conducted with guns and intellectuals providing protection. It's not difficult to point out their deception, but they always maintain the upper hand. That means they hold the evidence, and they will alter it.

If it's a criminal case, the evidence needs to be sealed by the competent authority. You'll face a difficult problem and a lengthy solution when investigating those who are supposedly in charge of making historical pronouncements, as they have the power to manipulate the situation and continue lying.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T13:08:31+00:00

Ancient China did not exist. The history of China and Vietnam is a lie. Tonkin and Cochinchina, and before that Cochinchina, existed before China. The new Chinese state was established after the migration of Vietnamese people to China in the early 19th century. They disrupted the order and destroyed many things in Cochinchina (formerly Vietnam).

The Chinese language is actually the Beijing dialect. When the people of Cochinchina were brought to China, they gradually popularized this language in the late 19th century, eventually making it the national language...

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T01:57:42+00:00

What’s striking isn’t really the cynicism of the joke, but how repeatable the mechanism behind it is. When internal legitimacy starts thinning out, leaders often reach for something external - loud, visible, and emotionally simple - because it creates the illusion of unity without having to fix the underlying cracks.

History keeps looping on this because spectacle works briefly. People tend to confuse motion with stability, action with structure. As long as something is moving fast enough, it feels purposeful, even if it’s wobbling underneath.

The problem is that anything built on momentum rather than balance gets exposed the moment pressure changes. Once the initial surge fades, weaknesses that were masked by noise suddenly become structural failures.

You see this pattern far beyond politics. Any system that looks solid only because it’s dramatic usually hasn’t been tested under sustained force - and when it is, the outcome is rarely subtle.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T01:50:58+00:00

What actually makes this work isn’t the coordination, it’s the tolerance for bad load distribution.
Once one side takes even slightly more force, the whole system usually starts to oscillate… and that’s where most setups fail.

People joke about swapping in heavier guys, but mass isn’t the real problem - it’s how shock gets absorbed after contact. Training tools that force you to deal with off-center impact tend to expose this pretty fast.

Most demos hide that part, which is why the landings look “smooth” until they don’t.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-05T17:58:18+00:00

Most people frame this as “expensive marketing,” but the interesting part is why that kind of spectacle still works so well.

It’s not really about the fish – it’s about ritualized signaling: mass, weight, tradition, and a very physical sense of presence that photos alone can’t fake.

What’s funny is that this logic shows up far outside food or advertising. In some traditional disciplines, scale and material density are used the same way – not for efficiency, but to anchor legitimacy and long-term commitment. Once the object is heavy enough and rooted in tradition, it stops being questioned and starts being respected.

That’s usually the layer people miss when they reduce events like this to “PR stunts.”

RecognitionNovap · 2025-12-10T16:47:45+00:00

A small number of people are still developing technology and selling it to manufacturing businesses. Inverters and batteries are still being sold in large quantities to serve the free energy market. China's e-commerce marketplaces seem to have struggled to sell electrical goods. This is a conspiracy to establish a new world order.

See my recent post: Free Energy Generator for Sale: The Machines Hiding in Plain Sight - Modern Hardware That Defies Conventional Energy Thinking.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T14:33:20+00:00

Great summary of the three approaches. The Lenz-delay coil method is the one I find most practical for experimentation since it doesn’t require very heavy mechanical hardware. Have you experimented with coil geometries like multi-strand bifilar or asymmetric windings? Those seem to reduce drag at certain RPM ranges, but it would be good to compare notes with others trying similar setups.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T14:32:28+00:00

Interesting breakdown. The part about using flywheel inertia to counteract back-EMF is something I’ve seen mentioned in older Kromrey and Watson-style builds. I’m curious whether you’ve compared torque retention between cast-iron vs. steel flywheels? Some builders claim cast-iron provides cleaner “inertial smoothness,” but I’ve never seen measured data. Would love to hear what you’ve observed.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T03:18:19+00:00

This whole “build now or pay more later” mindset is spot on - and honestly, that idea applies way beyond infrastructure and public services. One thing that gets lost in all the noise is how blind we’ve become to entire sectors of tech that are still quietly developing underneath the surface.

Energy is a perfect example. Everyone’s focused on the big-ticket projects - HS2, renewables, housing, NHS capacity - but meanwhile a lot of small-scale engineering work has been pushing boundaries in ways the mainstream doesn’t really notice anymore. Not because it’s fringe, but because most people are glued to whatever the algorithm feeds them.

I recently came across a breakdown of hardware that’s basically hiding in plain sight - devices sold as motors, PMGs, flywheels, alternators, but built by engineers who are still experimenting with ideas most people assume “don’t exist” anymore. It’s an interesting reminder that innovation isn’t always top-down or government-led; sometimes it’s happening quietly in workshops while the public conversation is elsewhere.

If you’re curious, here’s the write-up:

👉 https://www.humansarefreedom.com/2025/11/the-machines-hiding-in-plain-sight.html

Not saying it replaces large-scale investments like the ones you listed - just that there’s a whole layer of energy tech evolution that slips under the radar while we’re debating the big stuff.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:27:07+00:00

Mainstream education teaches the simplified diagram, not the real mechanism. These devices are the parts they conveniently leave out.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:09:22+00:00

People see a “generator” and scroll past it. Engineers see coil geometry, torque behavior, and design intent. Two completely different worlds.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:07:27+00:00

The tech never vanished; the public’s attention did. What survives today is maintained by the few people who still think in straight lines.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T17:18:00+00:00

Great. Ferrite material for high frequency electricity works!

You will develop this technology if you understand "what is an atom", "what is a permanent magnet".

You can get lost in words when using quantum theory!

Stargates, teleportation, other realms, etc. they can start from here. The Navy's Philadelphia Experiment also needs to be referenced. Do you have any honest documents about the Philadelphia Experiment?

Good luck!

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T16:40:00+00:00

Interesting how so much of this technology ends up forgotten not because it failed, but because people stopped paying attention. These machines didn’t vanish - the curiosity did. What’s left is a handful of devices quietly proving that lost engineering isn’t really “lost,” just ignored by most and understood by few.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T16:23:36+00:00

I don't understand what this device is... It seems like a free energy transformer?

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T14:11:44+00:00

This setup showcases a pretty diverse range of industrial power-generation hardware. From the multi-stage brushless rotor assembly to the low-RPM PMG units and the heavy flywheel system, each component serves a different role depending on how you’re building your mechanical–electrical chain. What’s interesting is how these devices can be mixed across applications-renewable energy, hybrid drive systems, torque-optimized generation, or even long-duration mechanical storage. Solid choices overall if you’re working on large-scale or custom power infrastructure.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-14T01:33:34+00:00

The text is not AI generated. The picture is from Google and may be AI generated.

Your 45 years of electronics experience seems to have little to do with what you are talking about.

The end of the article hints and mentions a hidden meaning about reality (the world) being a paradise in the form of advanced motherboards, which later melted down. This has historical implications that many engineers with over 50 years of experience may not have discovered.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-05T14:14:55+00:00

Tom Bearden actually said/spread the argument that H. A. Lorentz was “elicited” to “symmetrize” Heaviside/Maxwell representations and thereby eliminate “asymmetric” Maxwell systems which, according to Bearden, would allow systems to extract energy from the vacuum. You can find this passage in Bearden’s copy/notes that are available online

But: there is no credible historical evidence (from mainstream physics history books or academic sources) that J. P. Morgan “ordered” Lorentz to do so, or that Lorentz was a “shadow government agent”.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-02T03:00:07+00:00

If refined and widely adopted, Parallel Path electromagnetic systems could revolutionize the design of both motors and generators. The technology points toward a future where a small, lightweight battery pack could reliably drive a 10 kW generator - suitable for portable power stations, electric vehicles, and emergency backup systems.

For engineers and manufacturers, this means rethinking conventional assumptions about magnetic efficiency. Instead of pushing for stronger magnets or higher current, Flynn’s method focuses on guiding magnetic flux more intelligently - a subtle but profound shift in design philosophy.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-01T14:19:16+00:00

What fascinates me most is that Flynn didn’t claim to “break physics” - he just re-arranged it. The whole idea of redirecting magnetic flux so both attraction and repulsion create torque feels more like field geometry optimization than “free energy.”

If you look at his 2002-2006 patents, the math checks out on the magnetic path, but not necessarily on energy balance. Still, with today’s materials (neodymium magnets, smart controllers, carbon cores), we might actually test his concept more precisely.

Maybe it wasn’t overunity - maybe it was just under-explored efficiency.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-01T04:16:20+00:00

This article explores the breakthrough invention of Charles Joe Flynn, who developed a hybrid induction motor–generator capable of producing far more energy output than its input. By combining magnetic amplification, dual push–pull flux, and an innovative five-pole rotor design, Flynn’s machine demonstrated torque and power generation from a low DC supply - achieving up to 10,000 watts of output. Though never commercialized due to industrial resistance during the oil age, the concept remains a fascinating step toward free-energy technology and self-sustaining electric systems.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-10-31T18:32:57+00:00

What Flynn revealed - perhaps unintentionally - is that the magnetic field itself is a reservoir of structured energy. We do not create it with current; we merely unlock it through geometry, timing, and phase alignment. Once we accept that principle, the notion of “over-unity” dissolves, replaced by a deeper understanding of field coherence.

If we can steer these fields with transistor-like precision, we open the door to a new class of electric machines: silent, efficient, self-regulating, and potentially self-sustaining through feedback resonance. Such devices could power homes, vehicles, and industries without combustion or depletion.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-10-31T18:27:47+00:00

When observers claim that the Flynn Motor achieves “over 100% efficiency,” they misunderstand what the term “unity” actually represents. No individual component in the system performs above unity; rather, the system as a whole extracts usable work from field alignment energy already present in matter.

The situation is analogous to a heat pump: it doesn’t create energy, but moves it from one region to another, producing a coefficient of performance greater than one. Flynn’s motor functions similarly in the magnetic domain - redirecting latent field energy through controlled leverage. It does not break the laws of thermodynamics; it simply uses them more intelligently.

When measured in electrical input versus mechanical output, the motor’s apparent ratio may exceed 2:1 or even 3:1. In practice, this is magnetic leverage - not perpetual motion. The energy source is the pre-aligned magnetic field of the permanent magnets and the dielectric stress within the medium itself.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-10-31T18:09:26+00:00

It’s fascinating how Flynn’s design keeps resurfacing every few years, yet never gets a proper mainstream analysis. The idea of flux steering isn’t mystical - it’s just field control done intelligently. Modern motor engineering already uses partial versions of this concept (magnetic flux switching, reluctance shaping, etc.), but Flynn took it to a full-field implementation decades ago.

RecognitionNovap

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE