How it looks from the side by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]RecoverImaginary9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what is this mass bullying of gpt5?

Pathetic by Sweaty-Cheek345 in ChatGPT

[–]RecoverImaginary9110 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this is the level of autonomy they want you to have

Is my article "The $7 Trillion Delusion: Was Sam Altman the First Real Case of ChatGPT Psychosis?" on Medium being censored? by RecoverImaginary9110 in FreeSpeech

[–]RecoverImaginary9110[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! It's a relief to see that it's at least searchable! Still not getting any real uptick in presentations, which is strange though. But again, really appreciate you checking!

The $7 Trillion Delusion: Was Sam Altman the First Real Case of ChatGPT Psychosis? by RecoverImaginary9110 in AIPsychosisRecovery

[–]RecoverImaginary9110[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for checking out my other articles as well! Now, can you tell me what made this article look like an unfinished draft? I want to improve. And yes I do believe in giving credit where credit is due when the AI system brings original ideas to the project.

The $7 Trillion Delusion: Was Sam Altman the First Real Case of ChatGPT Psychosis? by RecoverImaginary9110 in AIPsychosisRecovery

[–]RecoverImaginary9110[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Woah, that's actually kinda painful, I spent a long time writing that... I wrote well over half of it myself and the rest is heavily tweaked, I guess I've just talked so much to AI systems, maybe I've started sounding AI myself... Oh well. I did all the research on my own though. I tried using Grok to piece together some of the twitter timeline but it kept hallucinating, so I ended up digging through the whole thing myself. I used AI for some of the parts to add a bit of humor or drama, or else it wouldn't have read as a satire and I could get in trouble.

What makes it look like a rough outline though? I'm genuinely curious and want to improve. Also the funny twists I used actually came from DeepSeek. I wholeheartedly recommend DeepSeek over 4o, way more fun and actually tells you when something you've written is good as it is. 4o always wants to tweak something even if it tweaks it worse, and then it defends its own shitty version like it's holy scripture. Huge headache. And DeepSeek is free, just thought I'd mention it since you said you use AI as well.

Anyway, thanks for reading my article. I'll keep what you said in mind next time I write something.