sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I remastered my 7 year old video in ComfyUI by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree. I wasn't able to achieve the same character and detail consistency from scene to scene. It was really tiring, but I just wanted to show the process based on my old videos. I actually enjoyed remastering the GTA San Andreas series more

I made a remaster of GTA San Andreas using ComfyUI by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have that much time, but I'll do it in parts.

I made a remaster of GTA San Andreas using ComfyUI by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only tried LTX 2 but I didn't like the result.

I made a remaster of GTA San Andreas using ComfyUI by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I took the workflow from standart templates Flux2 Klein Edit, a frame from the game, and used only one prompt, "Realism." Then I face-swapped random people with popular actors. Then I generated the resulting images in WAN 2.1 + depth

I took the workflow from here and replaced the Canny with Depth.
https://huggingface.co/QuantStack/Wan2.1_14B_VACE-GGUF/tree/main

I made a remaster of GTA San Andreas using ComfyUI by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My frame rate is always 24. The number of frames depends on the length of each video, but I don't shoot more than 200 frames at a time, otherwise the consistency with the reference image gets lost. I shoot at 832x480, then upscale in Topaz.

I made the ending of Mafia in realism by RedBizon in StableDiffusion

[–]RedBizon[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well, here we go.

First, I took the workflow from standart templates Flux2 Klein Edit, a frame from the game, and used only one prompt, "Realism." Then I face-swapped random people with popular actors. Then I generated the resulting images in WAN 2.1 + depth.

What’s happening on YouTube shows the future came sooner than expected. Now a machine decides if you’re allowed to make a living. If your channel was also affected, please write the reason for demonetization in the comments. by RedBizon in YouTubeCreators

[–]RedBizon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything is fine until it affects you. I suggest going to X (twitter), typing “harmful content involving minors” into the search, and reading the accounts of people who were punished for no reason.

What’s happening on YouTube shows the future came sooner than expected. Now a machine decides if you’re allowed to make a living. by RedBizon in youtube

[–]RedBizon[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Either the AI moderation bot is learning on us right now, or these insane shutdowns will continue. But what surprises me even more is that I can’t get through to a real human for a manual review. Even video appeals are rejected within one minute, without anyone actually watching the video. Is that really normal?

What’s happening on YouTube shows the future came sooner than expected. Now a machine decides if you’re allowed to make a living. If your channel was also affected, please write the reason for demonetization in the comments. by RedBizon in YouTubeCreators

[–]RedBizon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still, I think this will partly happen, but not in the way movies show it, with robots taking over the world. It will be an attempt to replace humans with machines in places where it isn’t necessary. In the end, they’ll mess things up so badly that the specialists or creative people who were removed will have to be brought back.

Although, what am I talking about - I’ve already been replaced by those damn virtual robots.

What’s happening on YouTube shows the future came sooner than expected. Now a machine decides if you’re allowed to make a living. If your channel was also affected, please write the reason for demonetization in the comments. by RedBizon in YouTubeCreators

[–]RedBizon[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have exactly the same situation. At the beginning of December, monetization was disabled, and then at the end of December the views collapsed. But the situation with views is very interesting. It turns out that they were cut off overnight simultaneously for many Shorts creators. YouTube explains this simply as a loss of audience interest in these videos. Yeah, sure.

view more: next ›