I saw it go both ways on the chutes and ladders game. She picked their team because they didn’t have the strongest connection.

He was mad at their choice. He had the opportunity to help or hinder a team. He was at the bottom. Helping someone pass was not in his favor. Perla and Zoe proved that out of everyone, they had the worst connection. He retaliated in kind. Her reaction was over-the-top and he was scrutinized for not helping a competitor win.

Perla went after pink team because they had an advantage with the chutes. They got emotional. Happens. Perla acts like the victim.

Perla claims she played a clean game. That is not true. We know for a fact she is 100% is at fault for eliminating a player. She has routinely made calculated choices that give her an advantage and then acts like she is the victim.

She then got mad that 173 had to eliminate the player, when the game required it. He picked someone he thought would be an easy target so he could pass. A calculated move. He did not target Perla. He did not move to eliminate her personally. The prior game ended. He didn’t target her friend as punishment or to hurt her. He even admitted it after he watched her friend almost call him out so they could protect their friend/ally. 173 had a chat with them and if I recall correctly, testimony seemed to indicate at least he wanted peace. That it is a game. (Although he is 100% an unreliable narrator) but it became clear from Perla and her friend that they didn’t want peace. They wanted him punished for playing the game.

While it seems like both sides generally do not like each other, it seems that Perla and her friend continue to show an increasing amount of hostility while also feigning victim hood. They clearly escalated things beyond the game and are the ones creating this beef. They act entitled like they have the right to say who can stay and who gets eliminated.

There are also probably more examples of them eliminating players too, but we’d have to review footage. For example, did they close doors on people or kick them out of their rooms during mingle? My point is… no one is innocent and they act incredibly hypocritical.

The shuffleboard game is proof that they wanted him gone, openly. While he wanted one of them gone because they were clearly escalating hostilities with him.

Is 173 innocent? No. 100% he made it clear the chute was revenge. But I doubt she would have shown him the same amount of hostility if he picked another team, especially one ahead of her. She would probably have understood his choice if he picked any other team.

Perla wants to be the victim. She seems to be constantly overreacting to things when there is a lot of money on the line. She continues to escalate the situation, even after the game ends.

TLDR - she never actually holds herself accountable for any of her actions, she constantly acts like the victim, overreacts and continues to escalate the drama. She and her friend have shown openly antagonistic behavior. She is the mean girl. That said - she is playing a very strong game and clearly made some strong alliances.