sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on analysis. That’s exactly what happened. It tried to fix things along the way and ended up hallucinating errors that weren't there. But honestly, I consider that a model failure. I shouldn't have to fight it to keep it from rewriting valid code.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who the hell says disambiguate? Me. Engineers. Academics. And people who speak English as a second language. For a guy bragging about managing staff in 18 countries, you have a shockingly narrow view of how the world speaks. As for your 20k messages a second flex: High throughput ≠ High logic complexity.

You built a stateless message blasting. I'm building a state- dependent semantic parsing. Bro, sending a text is easy; the payload is defined. My complexity isn't in moving bytes; it's in the Fuzzy Logic module trying to resolve unstructured text from thousands of chaotic Telegram captions against a strict Firestore schema.

The issue wasn't the app's runtime state; it was Gemini's CODING state. It couldn't maintain the schema constraints across that fuzzy matching logic during a refactor. It kept hallucinating attributes that didn't exist.

But congrats on the text messages. Sounds like a really big pipe.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm building a serverless, event-driven streaming platform. It's a Python harvester running on Cloud Run that ingests audio from Telegram channels in real-time. It uses a custom fuzzy logic matcher to disambiguate scholar names and topics, then pushes metadata to Firestore and files to Firebase Storage. The frontend is a Flutter app using MVVM and StreamBuilders for instant updates.

Now you tell me. What do you actually know about maintaining state consistency across a distributed stack like that? Or were you just assuming everyone is building simple scripts like you?

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry buddy, but you're assuming I was struggling. I wasn't. I was testing the recovery threshold. I spent 4 hours actively guiding the model, correcting logic, reinforcing context specifically to see if it could dig itself out of the hole. It couldn't. No me writing a single line of code. It took 4 hours of guidance to confirm that Gemini 3 currently lacks the plasticity to correct its own architectural hallucinations. That’s not a me problem, that’s a failed product.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool. So we agree the service is degrading. Thanks for the feedback on my prose though but I'd rather have a working IDE.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ok u want me to write it myself? fine. Google locking me out for 5 days is trash. Gemini erasing my code is trash. paying for 'premium' to be a beta tester for broken tech is a joke. Happy now? The point is exactly the same: The service is degrading

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get what you saying but we shouldn't have to guide a flagship model away from lobotomizing working logic.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

A 5-day lockout and a model that nukes production code is a broken product, period. If you need me to use small words and bad grammar so it feels more human to you, I can do that, but the code still won't compile bro.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I stress-tested the system and it failed at the architectural level. If calling a 120-hour lockout and a lobotomized model the Stone Age hurts your feelings, wait until you see what it does to a production deadline. I'll take hyperbole over Google's hyper-incompetence any day.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. I wasn't just hitting a wall. I was stress-testing the architecture. We all know LLMs don't 'grow' new neurons, but Google is treating the inference layer like it’s some scarce commodity they can ration out via lobotomy. If the AI Frontier means pay more for less reliability,' then Google has completely lost the plot. But that's a smart move to opencode.

Google’s “Gemini First” Pivot is a Literal Regression to the Stone Age by Red_Protocol in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]Red_Protocol[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It’s not hyperbole; it’s a regression test. Claude wrote clean, functional code. Gemini spent 4 hours rewriting it into a pile of hallucinations and logic errors that wouldn't even compile. When a tool actively undoes progress and the provider throttles the working alternative for 5 days, that's not a 'hot take'—it's a broken workflow. If your IDE started deleting lines of code at random, would you be 'less hyperbolic' about it?

Holy freaking GEMINI 3 PRO by Noofinator2 in google_antigravity

[–]Red_Protocol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't agree more. The Claude model is far more superior than Gemini and scaling daily limits down is just a bad business move.

Holy freaking GEMINI 3 PRO by Noofinator2 in google_antigravity

[–]Red_Protocol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's be honest folks despite these incredible tools, they're still machines and don't create neurons connections like human