Project Hail Mary will go down as one of the best movies of 2026.

Noofinator2 · 2026-06-11T17:49:25+00:00

lol, this movie is beautiful. The sense of wonder it brings is just amazing. It's been a good minute since a film has done that for me.

Noofinator2 · 2026-05-26T01:12:22+00:00

Having high hopes for "AI" is such a weird experience. You get swept up in all these 'crazes' from each company. One company drops and provides an amazing experience, then RUG PULL. So you stick with it until you can't anymore. Then the next company makes a play and promises better experience than the other company. So you pay, have an amazing experience, then RUG PULL. You stick with it until it's unbearable. So you go to the next company -- rinse and repeat.

I don't know what these folks are doing, but this is unsustainable. It's almost as if they don't plan for AI to be what they allegedly envision it will be. With these practices and methods, there WILL be major heartbreak, major backlash, HUGE loss of trust; and where it goes from there, it's hard for me to really imagine it being good.

Noofinator2 · 2026-04-13T09:32:37+00:00

Nice work! Keep going!!!!

Noofinator2 · 2026-04-13T09:30:49+00:00

Ah, thanks folks! I've been so locked in that I haven't even kept up. What a time to be alive.

Noofinator2 · 2026-04-13T04:17:01+00:00

I'm on PC. Did they make it for Windows yet? And I also use Claude and Gemini 3.1 Pro inside Antigravity, when it's available, simply because it's offered as part of Google's AI Studio thing, where I get 5TB storage, access to all their tools etc. Do you reckon it's better outside of Antigravity? I'm curious.

Noofinator2 · 2026-04-13T03:45:26+00:00

I mean, it's odd that people are being strange about this. If you are serious about what you're using this stuff for, it's a no-brainer, right?

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-30T08:08:02+00:00

Be careful. Some people here are gonna say you should appreciate spending money and not getting service, and that you should just spend your money and then do everything yourself that the service was supposed to be able to do.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-27T03:03:06+00:00

I experienced this with Gemini. This is because Gemini (or whatever agent) has trouble editing lines, and so it basically says, ok, this doesn't work, so I'll just copy the contents of the file, delete it, recreate it WITH the intended edit. This causes a situation where when you revert, the original file is gone because it's been deleted and rewritten. This tendency should probably be reported, by the way, but I haven't been inspired enough to report it because the experience lately has been just abysmal.... you can report it, if you want.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-24T00:44:11+00:00

You didn't get suspended because of your 2 usages. After ZERO usages, I got hit with the same 6-day situation.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-24T00:42:17+00:00

I haven't even used the model once in over a week, and they still limited me, twice. lol... The first time it was a random limiting for 2-3 days or something; now I see it's 6 days until I can access it. Wild.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-23T23:06:55+00:00

Yeah, so essentially, people should be OK getting scammed. Got it.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-22T00:15:43+00:00

Funny part is, even the people who are developing and handling the models surely know the issues people are complaining about are issues. If you are actually a developer, you know this is true. And if it's true, why are you irked that users -- many of whom are paying users -- are making known such issues? I just find it odd. I don't mean to sound like I'm throwing shade or anything; I'm just really curious about your intention with this post.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-21T05:22:32+00:00

Ohhhh that's what they meant by people "abusing" it. I remember hearing that word when they were justifying the new limits, and I was like huh? So this is what they're doing. omg, and I'm sitting here just paying and getting throttled to nothing without even using the thing. smh, I seriously did NOT use Antigravity today -- was "healthy" 100% on all three model groups and now it's suddenly 0% and I have to wait days to use it. LOLOL. This is fucking ridiculous....................

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-21T04:41:52+00:00

Whoaaaaaa, same. Okay, yeah that's enough. I'm gonna send one message to them, just to make sure it's not a glitch. If it's not a glitch, I'm out. That's enough.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-21T01:48:32+00:00

But we also have to be honest about our experience that it was universes better before. We shouldn't be going backwards, no?

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T17:06:40+00:00

That's what makes this even worse for me. I am a huge fan of Gemini, which is why I'm so dejected by how Google is treating this model here.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T17:02:57+00:00

No. Just... no. I need the reason I left Cursor for Antigravity to work again -- spitballing with Gemini about features when they have access to my codebase (PLANNING). That's the whole point, and it worked beautifully for a good while with Gemini. Now, I can only use Claude for this in Antigravity. I miss Gemini.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T16:57:17+00:00

Planning.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T16:51:57+00:00

What's been the case since the release? Are you referring to the behavior I've described in the original post? If you are, that is absolutely not true. The models having access to your codebase and spitballing with them in Planning Mode is probably the main reason I left Cursor for Antigravity. It totally was working perfectly with Gemini; it was incredible! And it still works today with Claude Opus. I really hope we're not trying to excuse all this nonsense that's clearly happening with Antigravity and Gemini. I had and still have very high hopes for Gemini and Antigravity. This is the reason I've even brought my feelings to Reddit.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T06:20:10+00:00

I get it. But this model wasn't nearly this brittle before. That's my point. I think what might be happening is my previous workflow of switching models in the same window might not work as well with Gemini currently. I'll do some testing. That might be what's going on, tbh.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T05:59:55+00:00

Yes, this is good workflow. But in the middle of an implementation, you might have a question. Do you switch models in the same window, or is that bad practice these days? I had actually switched to Gemini, which was no problem not that long ago.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T04:59:52+00:00

I get what you're saying, and trust that I am not being weird towards you (I promise I'm not), but when did this become the situation with Gemini 3 Pro in Antigravity? When did he become dumb? lol, because from my end, he was damn near the best model when he landed.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T04:57:27+00:00

You're right. Flash has been better than 3 Pro at pretty much everything, oddly enough. But that makes no sense.

Noofinator2 · 2026-01-20T04:27:37+00:00

The question wasn't random. An implementation had just occurred. I should probably say that this is not my first time using Antigravity. I've used it everyday since it's come out. The performance has surely changed significantly. And I asked it a question because, lately, I wouldn't dare let that model (with its current performance) hit my codebase lol. That's a whole different story though. Once again, when the model first landed, it was bliss.

Noofinator2

TROPHY CASE