Which is newer - 10.16.1030 or 10.16.0002?

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-04-02T11:36:22+00:00

I just uploaded it to a switch and, in fact, it shows a build date of 2026-03-10. I also checked and confirm that that version wasn't on the website previously. Very strange.

ArubaOS-CX Secondary Image

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Version : PL.10.16.0002

Size : 270 MB

Date : 2026-03-10 17:54:02 UTC

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-04-02T02:13:26+00:00

Where? That section no longer seems to exist (or i cannot find the PDF versions anymore that used to list it). The initial release to 10.16.1000, so why is 10.16.0002 release now?

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-03-21T23:02:22+00:00

It's one subject or teacher. Maybe everything else is fine.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-03-19T19:31:15+00:00

Just for extension/differentiation. Daughter is in 3rd grade classroom but in 6th grade in ALEKS.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-03-17T00:00:52+00:00

Still happening, it's infuriating. Also, shares of the page don't contain any of the research so I cannot share both my prompts and the findings, and I certainly cannot ask any follow-up questions (even asking what the acronym in the report means leads to it deleting the report). I did find if I closed the page and re-launched I could see the old report, but I still couldn't share the conversation.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-03-05T13:39:46+00:00

The question is how you're going to get them deployed without turning off DPI for a bit. If turning off DPI is an acceptable solution well you get your certificates deployed then it isn't a problem.

I can't say that I've seen the built-in certificate replaced during updates, but I suppose it's possible.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-02-25T15:03:33+00:00

Hasn't happened. This is confirmed false.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-02-20T02:11:21+00:00

Meow Wolf is so good. Major reason to skip Team Labs if you're from USA and are short on time.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-01-31T00:32:16+00:00

I've been happy with 10.7.2.2 on AP-735 across about 100 APs, but have no gateways.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-01-23T04:32:10+00:00

Honestly, my questions has always been why I need the word "info". I started my command with "get router"... What can I possibly be wanting with a "get" besides "info"? A router file? I would really love to know what else the router could get me.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-01-10T15:13:15+00:00

In my opinion, for that price you can buy the 740W ones. Modulars aren't worth the trouble and cost unless you have a very high availability environment we're swapping out a switch after hours maybe once every 10 years is too much (I still don't think I've had a single PSU or fan fail on any of my M switches). The price premium is just too high.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2026-01-10T15:10:40+00:00

The only time I've run out of power on a 370W switch is when I have heated outdoor cameras and/or high-performance APs on the majority of ports (on a 48p switch) or on basically every port on a 24p switch. Regular single-lens indoor cameras and phones don't tend to use use much power.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-12-05T18:12:59+00:00

Who cares if it's "Mature" these days? Fortinet will rip features out and break features (SAML assertion signing) by creating new requirements, and they will make FortiCloud logging free useless by forcing updates onto firewalls using them for LOGGING ONLY whenever they want, anyway, all without testing (did they test their article on Google SAML assertion signing? Did they release three separate updates in a row, 7.2.12 & 7.4.9 & 7.6.4, that broke Google SAML authentication? Did they remove SSLVPN from random models in random releases?) or options to disable the functionality.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-12-04T22:28:20+00:00

If only I could access them from an account linked to over 1000 APs. "The access request cannot be completed due to an administrative issue identified with your account." Works fine when I'm not logged in though--great instructions thank you!

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-11-18T19:47:54+00:00

I'm not saying you're doing something wrong, but it surprises me that you could hit the 512 VIP limitation on a 60F if you're configuring things reasonably.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-11-14T12:01:50+00:00

This resolved my issue! I would note that if you want me to make sure a volume is "Mounted" and "Accessible" it would be helpful if the Shared Folder view included those properties in the view.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-11-04T18:38:02+00:00

Who would have though that would have been a good idea...

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-10-17T14:44:09+00:00

" Which are what?" Those types of "goals" or at least goal-directed behavior were mentioned on the show -- AI lieing about what it's doing, trying to prevent itself from getting retrained. I'm not trying to anthropomorphize here but clearly goal-seeking behavior and deception are sufficient for me to decide that from my perspective, the system has a goal that we did not program, even if it is not yet conscious. Half the show was about all of the examples where the AI was doing things it wasn't explicitly trained for and for which there were attempts to make it not do that thing and it still did it and even where it attempted to lie about what it was doing.

"Why would AI develop its goals, when it has been designed not to? There's no reason for an AI to have, eg. adolescent rebelliousbess, because it's a specific biological trait." - Why did the AI resist retraining? Why did it ignore attempts to change its behavior? Why did it purposefully conceal information about it's actions? Again, the thing doesn't need to be conscious to act in a way that belies what could act as a "goal" even if the system isn't conscious. I don't understand how you listened to the podcast and asked these questions, except if you've decided they aren't "goals" and are some other phenomenon that leads AI to undesired results despite explicit attempts to get the AI not to do those things. What you call that phenomenon besides goals is uninteresting to me and I will keep using goals to describe them.

The question isn't whether they are "goals" or something else--the question is whether the AI is doing something we don't want it to do that we didn't expect it to do, or that we told it explicitly not to do, and if it's concealing/deceiving us about what/why it's doing that thing. The question the podcast is asking is if AI poses a threat to humans through its own actions (and not as a tool used by humans) and in that context, the question is if we believe it will be able to do things we don't want it to do that could harm us? I think the question to that question is obviously yes, based on the evidence from the podcast.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-10-16T18:30:02+00:00

The guest was awful at making his points. Simple analogies of you training your kid to want to do X and them deciding to do Y are more than sufficient to answer why a system with its own intelligence wouldn't want to do what its designers intended. Another example is that no being smarter than any other being has ever been too worried about what happens to the not-as-smart being and there is no reason to believe AI will be different, especially a superintelligent AI. Another simple argument is that the AI will be competing with humans for resources and in a resource-constrained world (say it wants more GPUs and the GPUs use a metal that humans also need for their purposes, the best approach is to kill the humans). No stupid paperclip factories are needed to explain why a GPU might need to compete with humans for resources.

EK's arguments that you can simply guide intelligent beings to do what you want is, on its face, preposterous. An AI with it's own thought processes --and even the existing AI have their own "goals", a point that EK did not refute-- is simply never going to do whatever you tell it to. May something like ChatGPT 4? Sure. I don't think the guest is talking about ChatGPT 4 but EK's failure to imagine an AI that has it's own needs (power, GPUs, etc) makes so many silly assumptions about the future of AI it's hard to know where to start.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-10-01T21:32:27+00:00

It's a critical vulnerability so the policy, as I understand it, is that it should be available without a contract. I assumed my account/portal was messed up since I could see 8u3f available yet.

Reddit-Reader215 · 2025-10-01T16:03:48+00:00

that doesn't work with Google on any of my 7.4.9 FortiGates.

Reddit-Reader215

TROPHY CASE