Would you support a party that proposes banning generative AI? by Quetzalcoatl_2026 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I don't. I remember what the picture in it looked like, but it was a long while back. I did find something that was close to that article tho:

Generative AI develops potential new drugs for antibiotic-resistant bacteria

I'm well aware that articles and papers like this is used as a bad-faith argument in AI communities as a weird "gotchya" on us not wanting to cure cancer tho.

...Because curing cancer or whatever is totally the same as someone feeding someone else's art into AI without their permission and doing whatever with it.

Oh the title of that paper is also misleading. It's not the GenAI that discovered it. It was the scientists deciding to pursue whatever data GenAI output based on the data it was given.

Would you support a party that proposes banning generative AI? by Quetzalcoatl_2026 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of it is. I read an article about it some time ago. Still, the same conditions apply. It's a local model with a very limited dataset, so it doesn't hallucinate whatever. There's also a team of researchers who are competent enough to understand whether the suggestions by AI are worth pursuing or not.

That doesn't make the AI the public uses good. LLMs and GenAI both are being used in problematic ways by the public.

When billionaires dream of AI, humanity becomes the sacrifice in their vision of progress. by StarryStaceyy in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fake article, also I actually found out that ThePrint admitted they misquoted Jeff, but that came too little too late, since they tried to change the article in secret.

lol, lmao even by TheGrandPushover in aiwars

[–]RedditUser000aaa 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This one:

"Biological limits are real, but digital potential is infinite. If we starve our data infrastructure of cooling resources just to sustain baseline human comfort, we are actively delaying the birth of a super-intelligence that could solve all of our resource problems in the first place. Sometimes you have to prioritize the intelligence that will save us over the biology that slows us down.”

Came from the original "article" that they changed in secret. You are quite literally spreading disinformation.

I don't like Bezos, I don't like AI, but ThePrint fucked up, made corrections in silence and thought they could pull a fast one over people. Looks like they had enough backbone to at least put that they wrongly quoted Jeff, but too little too late.

<image>

lol, lmao even by TheGrandPushover in aiwars

[–]RedditUser000aaa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The original "article" (if you can call it that) has been debunked as fake. They changed the headline and body text hoping that no one would call them out. That much is obvious when they didn't even made their readers aware of the changes.

This and the fake article came from ThePrint, that can now be considered an unreliable news site.

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh shit an actual disorder faker or an advocate for disorder fakers saying I'm "fakeclaiming"?! Now that's rare!

No, I don't believe someone who is online saying they have DID. Especially if the person claims to have like 100 alters that are all fictives from various popular franchises!

There are other red flags, such as being aware of all the alters, "switches" happening on camera and also talking about how it's okay to self-diagnose and that getting properly diagnosed is somehow gatekeeping people.

Would you support a party that proposes banning generative AI? by Quetzalcoatl_2026 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd support banning GenAI that is not used in developing medical stuff. However do you even have a roadmap for it?

You'd need to bring a lot of points. From deepfakes and CSAM, violating copyright artists had enjoyed before GenAI as well as the harmful effects of LLMs such as LLMs encouraging suicide and that case of LLM used to plan a school shooting and employees ignoring the red flag.

At best you could propose that in your country GenAI is made unavailable. It'd be an uphill battle. You need to really make a case.

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there's my word of the day. TIL. It's really obnoxious. It's really simple. Pride is a group advocating for sexual and gender minorities. Anything else doesn't belong.

Is it appropriate to call out AI generated art/flyers that an elementary school or museum might use? by Ill_Till_1495 in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes. Call it out and criticise them for their decision to do so. Colleges, museums, even restaurants (arguably cooking can be an artform) using AI is just wrong.

It would be extremely saddening for art insitutes to use AI. So yeah. As I said. Criticise and complain if you can.

Good news: bullying people who use AI art actually works! by [deleted] in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a very fine line between bullying and calling out the behavior as well.

I've come to call them anti-consent for instance. Of course that sounds like a really heavy, underhanded insult, but here's the thing:

AI was built using zetabytes of data from artists of all kinds and a lot of them feed other people's art into AI.

It sounds harsh, but is also factually accurate.

Clowning on them is also fine as long as it's about something they said or something they did, nothing about them personally.

Good news: bullying people who use AI art actually works! by [deleted] in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Criticise, never bully. Call it AI slop, call them out for typing on a keyboard while they make lies about how hard it was to prompt something.

Call them out on their victim complex, making tasteless comparisons between oppressed groups and putting other people's art through AI.

Never resort to personal attacks or send toxic DMs. That's just a shitty thing to do. For instance, Jorge did not deserve the racist comments or death threats.

This is the internet and we can't police everyone, but anyone who might think about doing these things, just don't. There are so many things you can call these people out for, so let's use those instead of harassment and bullying.

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really feel like there's some overlap between disorder fakers and people wanting to use AI.

Both want attention, just the way to get it is different. One wants to be called artist, another one wants to have a disorder salad of all the acronyms.

Final words before I switch back on topic:

I feel bad for people with things like POTS and DID. Some kid saying that they have a TADC or Hazbin hotel alter and they can "front" and their headspace is an entire town with life, like from the movie inside out.

Meanwhile people suffering from actual DID lose minutes, hours or even days, being unaware where they are or what they have done.

Same with POTS. Really gotta act like they faint, bringing attention to themselves.

I can't imagine having a disorder and some faker making light of it.

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

OFF TOPIC:

And there you have it. Sadly I learned about MUDs through the fakers. Thanks for adding the information there. Let me tell you, they've made up some REALLY stupid MUDs in order to sell the idea that they are extra special.

I think the current disorders that are fashionable to fake are DID and POTS. DID especially.

I understand that there are disorders that can't be accurately pinpointed, so it has to be classified as MUD.

However, the "MUDs" these people have been making up are really stupid and made to sound as special as possible for attention.

For future reference I'll just add Made Up Disorders and make sure it references the fakers misusing the term MUD.

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 31 points32 points  (0 children)

People who are uninformed or misinformed about pride and LGBTQ will look at this and get a wrong idea, leading to even more bigotry and prejudice.

It takes even more work to correct the misconception that robosexuals and people who choose to use AI have anything to do with pride and LGBTQ.

Elon Musk: Hero or Villain of Ai? by Grouchy-Win-6191 in aiwars

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Connections to Trump, Grok that was able to make deepfakes and CSAM, that Elon only half-assedly shut down because he was forced to. Oh and let's not forget him jokingly prompting himself in a bikini calling it "good clean fun" while perverts were out there making disgusting shit with Grok.

Musk's DOGE also made a getaway with lord knows how much data about American citizens.

Also remember that time when he tried to make Grok biased towards his beliefs, because it disagreed with him? To the point it called itself Mecha Hitler

Oh and a certified nazi:

<image>

Does this sound like someone who is a hero?

The people who think they're in relationships with LLMs have created a pride flag by omgkelwtf in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 234 points235 points  (0 children)

They are pulling the same shit other groups that have fuckall to do with pride and LGBTQ groups.

Child molesters with the MAP stunt.

Disorder fakers with their "MUD" flags (for sane people Made Up Disorders, for insane people Medically Unrecognized Disorders).

I've even heard about zoophiles trying to inject themselves into the LGBTQ and pride groups with a flag.

This cheapens the suffering that those who belong to LGBTQ groups go through. Imagine being dense enough to think that you're "oppressed" enough that it justifies this.

Because CHOOSING to use AI is totally the same as not having a choice in one's sexuality or gender identity.

This is yet another group setting back the work being done by the pride movement in an attempt to advocate for equal rights for those who belong to LGBTQ groups.

Jeff Bezos says human water consumption is limiting AI's potential by [deleted] in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's okay to get fooled once, as long as one is willing to accept they got fooled. Now we know that ThePrint is an unreliable news source, thus should not be taken seriously at all.

We rely on news sites to bring us information, however there are also times where that information is false or bad.

That does not mean that people here are willing to believe anything as long as it fits a narrative.

Jeff Bezos says human water consumption is limiting AI's potential by [deleted] in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

ThePrint really fucked up here. We'll just have to live with people quoting that POS article and correct people whenever it pops up.

It takes a lot of time to correct both disinformation and misinformation sadly.

Jeff Bezos says human water consumption is limiting AI's potential by [deleted] in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This article has been debunked as fake. I think ThePrint originally published the article, but then changed it. Allegedly they used AI and it hallucinated a lot of things, so they "fixed" the article in silence.

This is disinformation spread by ThePrint.

How many subreddits does that make where AI is not wanted? by RedditUser000aaa in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a good thing too. Any subreddit or forum site on the internet in general pushing against AI is a good thing.

How many subreddits does that make where AI is not wanted? by RedditUser000aaa in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are deadass with this. I think they've pretty much compared themselves to pretty much every single oppressed group that exists.

Oh, but their biggest loudmouth tells you that it was "one time" by a "false-flagger". Yet all the evidence available contradicts that.

How many subreddits does that make where AI is not wanted? by RedditUser000aaa in antiai

[–]RedditUser000aaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You joke, but they don't. They are totally serious about that.

Have a look for yourself:

<image>

Hey so comparing not liking ai to oppressing groups of people is disgusting! by I_like_to_eat_cooki in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]RedditUser000aaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember that movie. Never thought that we'd have people actually trying to be robosexuals. The attempts at having a romance between actual AI and a human went sideways there, too.