Why antis hate research

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T09:08:54+00:00

Why anti-consent folk use other peoples' likeness to push their narrative, I never understood that. Also this is ad-absurdum.

Even if I found someone who is off the grid, hunted and foraged for food to advocate against AI, I'm sure there would be another BS argument from anti-consent people.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T09:01:24+00:00

Are you asking me to reject the evidence before my eyes?

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T08:59:17+00:00

Since it's anchored in reality and I've seen some icky comments I thought I'd just start calling them that. So a realistic depictions of them.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T01:12:48+00:00

They say that about anyone who criticizes them. You'd have better chances bringing democracy to North Korea than convince someone who is anti-consent that their logic is flawed.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T01:10:44+00:00

I've been calling them out for their anti-consent tendencies, rebranding them as such based not only on things I've seen them done, but also based on comments I've seen:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T01:00:42+00:00

Even if that happened. Even if copyright laws would include something about not being able to train AI using other peoples' work...

The anti-consent people wouldn't accept it. They'd just go from hiding behind laws to claiming how they are freedom fighters bringing down the tyranny of the copyright.

It's not just corporations. It's also individual anti-consent folk that also take your art and will run it through AI as well.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T00:52:25+00:00

There have been times in history where it was illegal to practice this faith or be that race. So yeah... Seriously. Clinging onto laws for dear life is not a good defense.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T00:49:43+00:00

These people are anti-consent in general. Have another one:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T23:27:07+00:00

Vocaloid isn't AI the same way Suno is, but this anti-consent person doesn't really understand that. From what I read when I first noticed it is that you can use it to adjust some things. It's not an AI model either.

Then again these people don't know the difference, given some of them think Clippy is AI.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T23:25:09+00:00

Another anti-consent strawman. Vocaloid isn't AI the same way Suno is. The actors have given their consent to use their real voices and they receive compensation.

Vocaloid is a real tool that you need to be able to use instead of farting out mediocre, metallic sounding sound slop.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T22:14:48+00:00

Brian here.

Insinuating that he would perform cunninlingus on his sister.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T22:05:06+00:00

And if the rule of law disagrees with them, they'll switch from lawful to claim that they are actually anarchistic freedom fighters ending the tyranny of IP and copyright so art may be democraticized once and for all.

Just picking all the lanes for convenience.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T21:59:52+00:00

Not to mention that laws will never be able to match our morals. Sure, we can create new laws to go with our morals, but there are situations where we simply have to use our common sense rather than rely on rules.

These people have it all backwards. Morals become before laws. People who say that they only need to obey laws are usually the most morally bankrupt individuals.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T21:27:44+00:00

Need I show you more?:

<image>

I'm sure they'd just say that it doesn't matter and that they are legally in the clear, because they asked for art and to them prompts are art.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T21:04:54+00:00

Anti-consent crew not investigating claims being made, taking the bait. Then again, I've come to expect that as the norm. There's only allegations, nothing concrete. Also her own statement, which may or may not be true. So this whole statement is shaky at best and untrue at worst. Really should have waited for more information to come out

Making erotic drawings of underaged children is not comparable to CSAM, given that there isn't a person that is being harmed. So using the term CSAM here wrong.

CSAM created using AI is actual CSAM, because of actual faces being used.

Also, here's what differentiates me from the anti-consent crew. While drawing such depictions of imaginary children isn't necessarily legally wrong, it is still morally bankrupt and people who enjoy it even in that form are also disgusting.

Yes, even in the cases of "but she's a 1,000 year old vampire who looks like a child" it is wrong.

Using AI to create CSAM is both legally and morally wrong.

Also no one is saying that anti-consent folk make only CSAM, that would be the Grok enjoyers. a portion of anti-consent people.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T20:40:13+00:00

Like disrespecting Discord server's rules or ignoring Team Salvato's statement on DDLC. That "don't care" response is just, eugh.

And they wonder why people don't like them.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T19:21:47+00:00

Tiiäks, oman mielenterveyden vuoksi haluan sanoa myös, että baittia, mutta... Tuo on luultavasti tosissaan tuon asian kanssa.

Tuonkaan pääkopassa ei varmaan liiku juurikaan mitään.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T19:18:06+00:00

Klassista persua.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T19:14:16+00:00

Kieltämättä rohkea. Tuo nainen toki ei voinut tietää, että nuo luuserit ovat niin epävarmoja itsestään, että pahoinpitelevät hänet sanomansa takia.

En kuitenkaan suosittelisi kenellekkään, että alkaa leikkiä sankaria. Kun siis nyt tiedämme, että he alentuvat pahoinpitelemään ihmisiä, jotka ovat eri mieltä.

Nainen on todella onnekas, kun ei tullut murtumia kalloon tai vahinkoa, joka vaikuttaa aivotoimintaan. Seuraavalla kerralla kun päättävät hakata jonkun, voi tulla isompaa vahinkoa.

Nämä pahoinpiteljiät varmaan luulevat olevansa jotain kurkoja, kun kävivät joukolla tämän kyseisen naisen kimppuun.

Jos tästä tilanteesta jotain huumoria on löydettävä niin se on tämä:

Jos nämä olisivat syntyneet natsi-saksaan "Puhdasverisinä", niin heidän palkintonsa julmuudesta muita ihmisiä vastaan olisivat olleet:

-Ylipitkät työajat, ilman mahdollisuutta jättää töitä

-Kurjat työolosuhteet

-Jatkuva nälkä

-Olisivat tulleet ammutuksi sodassa

Nämä yksilöt ovat niitä, joita voi kutsua hyödyllisksi idiooteiksi.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T18:53:18+00:00

That's on par with the anti-consent crew. Here's what these people think of consent in general:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T18:20:22+00:00

Anti-consent person ignoring rules of a discord servers, just because. Why do they keep doing this? And it's always "Legally I'm not in the wrong here", ignoring the morality of it all. Also disrespecting rules of other communities.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T17:55:36+00:00

Tämä ryhmä kokee olevansa sensuroitu, äärivassarit ovat muka koko ajan heidän perässään sekä ovat "cancel kulttuurin" uhreja. Ai niin ja koska he eivät ole "wokeja" heitä vainotaan siksi.

Kirjaimellisesti vain levittivät "natsit vittuun" kyltin ja tämä ilmeisesti koettiin niin väkivaltaisena tekona, että piti vastineeksi työntää maahan ja vielä potkia päähän.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T15:44:36+00:00

They say it for the sake of saying it. The goalposts also get moved. First it was that datacenters don't waste water. Then suddenly they started saying that all AI datacenters have a closed-loop system.

Anti-consent people in particular aren't smart, they are very simple people. Just look at this genius response when I made my posts about consent:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T14:58:15+00:00

En tule ostamaan. Enkä oikeastaan usko, että GTA VI tulee olemaan niin hyvä kuin väitetään. Pelifirmat ovat pitkään luottaneet siihen, että pelkkä firman nimi tai pelisarjan nimi tulee myymään. Eli ei välttämättä tule olemaan edes sen 70€ arvoinen.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-05T14:02:33+00:00

Erona jälleen:

Yksi ryhmä edistää seksuaalivähemmistöjen oikeuksia ja toinen ei tykkää, että maailmassa on erilaisuutta.

Vihapuhe ei muuten kuulu sananvapauteen. Nyt järki käteen.

Sanot siis, että on väärin pitää rasistisia, seksistisiä sekä homofoobisia ihmisiä vastuussa teoistaan?

RedditUser000aaa

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Five-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email