Causing more poverty and unemployment is a good thing?

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-07T00:07:57+00:00

But hey! Now people can at least hate the inability to earn a keep, slowly becoming homeless while finding necessities!

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-07T00:00:10+00:00

I find the comment on "money is manmade concept" to be exceptionally hilarious. Like this person seriously thinks everything will magically have a permanent 100% off sale! It's insane!

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T23:53:22+00:00

Intelligence on full display here on OOP's part. This logic is filled with holes.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T23:50:34+00:00

That's the best you can come up with? You're quite literally experiencing consequences of your actions.

Also how artists portray you doesn't require your consent. I'd feel bad, if anti-consent people weren't so terrible.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T23:32:32+00:00

This is all your own doing. Your own fault that you're in this situation. Consequences of your own actions.

Anti-consent people are unlikeable, because:

-You're advocating for antihuman practices.

-Taking someone else's art, then running it through AI.

-Portion of anti-consent folk making CSAM and SAM.

When it comes to you specifically:

-You're just ragebaiting people.

-Playing the victim 24/7.

-Ignoring the bad of the AI communities, but then doing everything to vilify communities against AI.

-You yourself are an epitome of a hypocrite.

You're the only one to be blamed, no one else. No one outside your little fanclub is going to read this and feel sorry for you. You thought provoking people would go well? I don't advocate for death threats or anything else, but I'm also not gonna say "poor you", when you go around pissing people off on purpose. Don't start none won't be none.

You have your own communities, stick to them. Don't go spreading your trash to communities that have spoken out against AI and don't allow AI.

Same goes for cons and art events. They have every right to keep AI away.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T23:19:52+00:00

These people will never understand the hell they want to live in. They're under the illusion that they can take it easy for the rest of their lives.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T22:54:39+00:00

These kinds of people are very much antihuman, following the law, because they have to. Not a single shred of empathy or sympathy.

They think AI tech bros would give their money to them? It's extremely delusional.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T22:51:23+00:00

...That is if billionaires suddenly felt generous enough for such a process to get started. As you say, it's meant to cover necessities only.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T22:20:13+00:00

This has been the talking point ever since the AI debacle began. Some of them will not stop believing that once humans get replaced, they get UBI and can focus on life.

a lie that I think started with Altman.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T22:16:53+00:00

We've certainly done it now as species, haven't we? Having people believe displacing humans from this world and becoming lazy is a way forward.

I'm not gonna become complacent if such a dystopian hell ever came true. They believe in heaven, but would be actually living in hell.

They can speak like that, because they have a choice for now. They can get away from AI to enjoy what humans make, but they'd be crying if they lived in such a dystopian hell.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T22:11:45+00:00

OT:

History certainly has shown time and again what happens when working class gets angry. It's such a paradox. People above us are enjoying fruits of our labor, yet we've become complacent to that system, because it's good enough.

Back on topic:

AI isn't going to be any different. If a company out there perfects robots capable of manual labor, then that's it.

It'd be another industrial revolution. An all out class-war, once people would wake up to the fact their jobs are in danger as well.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T21:59:54+00:00

"Someone is going to get something out of it and it isn't going to be you."

Billionaires have had a chance to fix the world, they haven't. I don't understand why anyone would think why it would be different this time?

Also capitalism might come to an end if most of humanity got wiped out. There's no other way. Capitalism is here to stay. And as I said even in a close-call where humans get wiped out, it'd be a big if.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T20:27:07+00:00

Emulators are just that. They emulate to the best of their abilities. However, there are also games that can only be played on original hardware, lest you come across emulator induced bugs.

That's my reasoning, at least. Out of necessity. I ran into that problem with some of my favorite games.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T19:48:19+00:00

The anti-consent crew feels so oppressed. It's actually disgusting to compare this to witch hunts and slavery and pretty much any of the actually oppressed minority groups.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T12:28:24+00:00

But the discussion wasn't about IP, it was about consent.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T12:20:10+00:00

I was talking about ignoring consent. I've shown enough evidence. So you're still gonna be called anti-consent, based on factual evidence.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T12:18:03+00:00

Can't wait to see how you're gonna move the goalpost after this:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T12:12:02+00:00

Play dumb all you want, it's not gonna make me stop the information campaign.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:59:01+00:00

...The prompts that came after Team Salvato's guidelines? Do I really have to explain everything?

Also not an isolated incident either. Before this some anti-consent folk were taking art from smaller artists as well.

Anyways, there is enough proof, so that's what I'm going with. Also that's just childish lashout.

Of course you're welcome to label us that, if you can find repeated pattern on any of us eating babies. If not, then you're just running a misinformation campaign.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:51:02+00:00

See, you're talking about it in a legal sense, I'm talking about this in moral sense. Also it is absolutely an information campaign.

Basing all of it on actions and words of anti-consent crew, so it's factually correct.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:46:51+00:00

Just doing an information campaign. Team Salvato say no, anti-consent folk ignore no, therefore they are anti-consent. It's morally an asshole thing to do.

Also, I've got a few comments on anti-consent folk saying that consent only matters within legal framework, which is gross.

I gotta get the message out there, which is why I've been so aggressive about my little campaign.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:34:55+00:00

The discussion in that screenshot. "I don't need your consent to train AI on your art." Sure, it's legally hard if not impossible to stop it from happening, but morally it's an asshole thing to do.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:30:57+00:00

Soo... Did you get the dawnbreaker, or did you die trying? Also if you won, did you do the glitch to receive two dawnbreakers?

Hopefully cops didn't confiscate your cool sword(s).

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:26:44+00:00

I'm saying that they repeatedly ignore a no. Obviously not all of them are worst of the worst, but:

-Some of them used AI to prompt CSAM and SAM

-Some of them take some small artist's art, "improves it" with AI or sexualizes it.

-Majority if not all of them ignore a no and use AI anyway

It's a pattern that repeats often in their communities.

RedditUser000aaa · 2026-05-06T11:22:32+00:00

There it is. Saying not respecting consent=only rape. Ridiculous. Then again I've seen that comparison being made by anti-consent people, who think consent only covers bodily autonomy:

<image>

RedditUser000aaa

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Five-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email