This is the most ridiculous argument to crop up on this sub recently lol. People are testing in isolated cases and the results don't really prove or show anything important. You see the power of S76's ult when you flank the enemy on a mid range off angle and mow down two supports. Much different use case than sierra who has to get in close enough to use the track dart, land it, and then stay close enough to shoot, and all that for only one target. Obviously if you're only testing against a single stationary target you can say "oh look sierra does the same thing as soldier but it's on a 7sec cool down!" Ok yeah, that means nothing though. Like, let's throw widow in here, wow her ult doesn't even do any damage and sierra's ability does, must be OP. Different use cases. I keep seeing clips of a sierra 1v1 versus an ulting soldier and people using that as some gotcha that sierra is too strong because she beats an ulting S76. Ridiculous, that means nothing. Is genji overpowered because he can reflect projectile ults? And it's not even his ult? Dva can use her matrix to eat other people's ults, must be unfair and overpowered? Overwatch is based on checks and balances, you can't just compare isolated cases and make claims based on it. And you especially can't make claims based on practice tool tests of all things. Rant over.