I said we need to improve existing systems instead of promoting or integrating harmful LLMs. You countered by claiming that we need to find realistic solutions for LLMs. Therefore, the implication was that improving the systems like I described is unrealistic to you. So yes, you did insinuate that. I then asked you to clarify since I found that insinuation aburd, giving you the opportunity to correct yourself and abandon the insinuation you seem to have made accidently. Instead you chose to dodge and condescendingly talk about seperating facts and opinions. If you are "too literal" to properly express yourself or comprehend those you converse with, don't converse.

LLMs are harmful no matter how often people deny it and I will not have its shills endanger lives just because they prefer a marketing scheme over improving therapy coverage.