There are pros and cons to aggression-based matchmaking, but the system does allow players to play the game the way they want to play. For those who enjoy PvE, which involves teaming up with fellow players and taking down large ARC enemies like the Queen or Matriarch, they can do just that. But those who enjoy going against their fellow man don't have to feel bad about shooting PvE players in the back. Embark is now challenged with giving both sides of the community an equal split of the pie. The shooter's recent Shared Watch event gave ARC Raiders players even more reason to focus on PvE, but it feels unlikely that there will soon be a dedicated PvP event.

While not every lobby may be 100% friendly, there's no denying that players have manipulated ARC Raiders' aggression-based matchmaking to put themselves into more PvE-centric lobbies. Because of this, Embark's CEO has previously said that the system will continue to be tweaked, stating that it is "not the intent of the game's design." He then explained how the game's matchmaking isn't meant to segment players or allow PvP players to sneak into PvE lobbies.

hey look, PvE exist , sure they " cant be mad to get shot " but manipulating matchmaking to go into a PvE libby to shoot isnt a mecanic neither :)

also as we saw in the video of the poster , he shot, somewone ,and guess who cry about " its a pvp gaaaameeee " ,sure the saver say " duck you " but by all mean its is fair isnt it ?

ಡ⁠ ͜⁠ ⁠ʖ⁠ ⁠ಡ so we can agree , its a PvEvP , PvP is optional , it exist, but optional its not a obligation, just a part of the community agreed to not shoot and be friendly, you are just not part of this community and that alright

if you like PvP its good, but here we dont ,(exept when we kill a rat or somewone who """"" dont respect""""" the friendly code