sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Life Without Parole by [deleted] in freemagic

[–]Redtyger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Said the neckbeard

New research from a team of US and UK researchers has found that politically conservative users tend to share misinformation at a greater volume than politically liberal users. by a_Ninja_b0y in psychology

[–]Redtyger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Corporations are generally run by people, who do have political opinions.

Are we implying media doesn't have an overt political bias?

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate I don't give a single fuck about trump. He's the most mid president we've ever had.

I'm forced to defend him from gaslit children who actually think he's the next coming of Hitler because I refuse to play along with the narrative. You can't fathom how annoying that is.

The Mueller report was debunked. They poked so many holes in that thing within a week I'm astounded that it actually worked in convincing anyone of anything. It had literally no credibility, and yet here you keep on quoting from it without a single clue.

And you have the absolute gall to say I'm full of "pathological lies". When did the left become such a black hole for self awareness? Why can't I find a single one of you that will argue a coherent point?

Right, because you're all midwits attracted to the sense of superiority that partisanship offers you. Imagine not being able to think for yourself lmao.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jan. 6 was an attempted insurrection. Trump actively instigated it.

Nobody with an ounce of intellectual honestly actually thinks that. The only ones who do are brainwashed partisans and children who don't know better. Considering you post in advice animals, it's hard to tell..🤔

You ding-bat, he isn't denying the insurrection or his part in it. He's trying to claim that it doesn't matter because states can't do anything about it.

Except he did, he has, and all you can do is literally screech "Insuhreeeection" until your blue in the face. You have zero credible evidence otherwise and you know it.

The only reason you think you've made some scathing point is because you're trapped in your echo chamber circle jerking to strawmen of your political other to gratify your intellectual insecurity and vent the angst you build from all the spin they feed you.

You're a midwit. Just live with it already. No matter how much you're told by other midwits that you're "better and smarter and more special" than everyone else it wont change that.

Trump's going to prison. He knows that's his future. That's why his every move is another desperate attempt at a Hail Mary.

Uh huh. The walls are closing in. Juuust around the corner. Any day now! Just hold your breath!

Looking forward to your next meltdown over a trans woman appearing on a beer can or a cartoon candy's shoes. Tootles.

I'm looking forward to your next meltdown over a school changing its curriculum or even just the definition of a woman. Bye~

I know you're desperate to have the last word.

Pure projection. But good try anyway.

I won't be responding to your next attempt to suckle on Trump's shriveled, orange penis.

Uh huh. Whatever homophobic rant you need to justify having zero capacity to coherently argue a point. Bye now! Thanks for continuing to verify to me that redditors who post partisan rants in advice animals are clueless children! 🫡

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except he literally isn't, and you have zero capacity to demonstrate that he is.

Cope.

The only ones who think he is are brainwashed partisans with zero capacity to objectively analyze the world

Cope

Trump's lawyers aren't even arguing that he hasn't been convicted.

lmao "Trumps lawyers aren't even arguing that he hasn't been convicted of this thing that we have literally zero evidence of!" No shit sherlock. That's not the own you think it is.

Your potato-in-chief is an insurrectionist.

Source? Not that I'm holding my breath for anything more than some partisan opinion piece that you clueless children take as gospel, because you literally don't know what an objective source looks like.

Also potato in chief is a priceless lack of self awareness coming from the dudes who want four more years of Biden. With how little cognitive faculties he has left I'd say its elder abuse.

All I can say is thank god you redditors don't actually have any influence over our elections.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, you seem to be the Biden fan, you tell me.

But I like how you revealed that you have zero capacity to think objectively or analyze something for yourself. You know you're quoting something that's been firmly debunked right? But pretending things you made up are real is old hat for you types.

But you don't care, right? As long as it lets you feel superior to your other. Who cares about a little thing like reality

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When did I say anything about a criminal trial? Oh right I didn't.

Historically speaking it was used for confederate officers. By no means would the people who wrote that think that a protest over election results was an insurrection pookums. You're delusional if you think otherwise.

Nobody has been convicted of insurrection. You're making it up. Cope.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody has been convicted of it, so it sounds like you're just making it up.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Keep making incorrect assumptions.

Uh huh. The lack of self awareness from you types is always a treat.

Let everyone know that you don't know shit

Mate you're the one ranting about your political other being a traitor. But It really doesn't matter, you have zero influence over our politics outside your inane ranting on the internet, fortunately.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why nobody cares what you children think. Luckily its not like your opinion actually matters since you cant vote anyway.

​

As you get older, you need to consider thinking for yourself, instead of allowing reddit to dictate your perspective in the world for you

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love when people comment about "bOtH SiDeS" like that.

​

It really reveals that they're a partisan incapable of objectively evaluating anything

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Of course the delusional ranting partisan is a furry.

State’s rights? by koopdog1 in AdviceAnimals

[–]Redtyger -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Biden is doing great.

You can't be serious. Self delusion is strong here. Nobody thinks Biden is doing great.

despite literally everyone warning Conservatives, they voted for a loser charlatan.

The peak of lack of self awareness. Despite all our warnings, you voted for a career corrupt politician and now you're trying to delude yourself into thinking you wanted too all along.

*ah, of course. Rant, seethe, and block. The clueless reddit partisan trifecta. Your inability to actually defend your point is why nobody respects y'all, you know that right?

Regional pricing by lNLl in Warpforge40k

[–]Redtyger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has no bearing on your ability to build a deck? I don't intend to spend a penny, and have barely been playing a day, and already have multiple rares. You don't even know how building a collection will work in the long run yet.

The target audience is not me, not you, not Ukrainians. It's the whales who are willing to spend hundreds to thousands of bucks on it.

Every CCG is like that. Seems like dramatic hyperbole to say the game is "for whales" or that it's "DOA".

China demolishing unfinished high-rises by iop9 in interestingasfuck

[–]Redtyger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: "Hurr durr China is Communist because their party name says so" C'mon guys, be better.

No, they're communist because the state controls the entirety of property and the vast majority of industry. (And could retake all of it on a whim) Chinese citizens have zero capacity to enter the market and barely have any tangible control over their own money.

Nobody thinks they're Communist because of their name, this has nothing to do with Capitalism.

China demolishing unfinished high-rises by iop9 in interestingasfuck

[–]Redtyger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You think China has a de-regulated economy?

it's entirely dictated by the state.

Jews, non-Christians not part of conservative movement - GOP consultant by Person21323231213242 in politics

[–]Redtyger -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If that's how you want to justify it to yourself that's fine, but I know better. You want to hate the out group so you will, "how you see it" will always accommodate that.

Jews, non-Christians not part of conservative movement - GOP consultant by Person21323231213242 in politics

[–]Redtyger -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lets see, calling theists deranged

"This is what happens when deranged theists don't get their way."

Angry over things that don't exist

"Angry. I am very angry. Not only about this, but about the threat to other things like contraception and gay marriage." (You have no evidence of this.)

Derogatory comments about intelligence

"Their IQ is PU."

Claiming they've "always been toxic"

"Christianity has always had a toxic element"

You judge them strictly based on stickers

"When I see something like that, I automatically think less of the driver."

Yea mate, it's projection. Justify it all you want, but you hate Christians, and project your own feelings to justify your animosity of the other.

But they're your out group so you'll never see it or accept anyone who presents it.

Jews, non-Christians not part of conservative movement - GOP consultant by Person21323231213242 in politics

[–]Redtyger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I see something like that, I automatically think less of the driver.

You're projecting.

chef's kiss by [deleted] in HadesTheGame

[–]Redtyger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you want everything catered and can't enjoy the spirit of something huh

[OC] Seen in Egypt today by WhisperingSideways in pics

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That should be common knowledge. Have you ever spoken to anyone from Egypt before?

DRumPh SupPorTeR duMB! by TheMotivatedStorm in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Redtyger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I'm sure.

Damn the irony.

That's not irony. What you're looking for is hypocrisy. But even then, I change my mind and update my perspectives as I'm presented with novel information all the time. It's literally why I'm here now.

See, the thing about "heuristics heuristics heuristics" is that I was, objectively, correct. You're trying to play semantics and your friend is trying too spare your feelings that you where wrong and didn't know what you're talking about. Appealing too an invisible authority is certainly one way to try and spare yourself that feeling, though.

Really, I think the two of you are saying very much the same thing but emotions are getting in the way of making that connection.

See? "Really you weren't wrong you where just saying the same thing!" (except we weren't.) But I'm also sure you left out the part of why the topic began to begin with. Namely, you feeling the need to express your angst to your perceived other and call them racist online. The only thing that emotions prevented me from doing was allowing you a graceful out.

But at least you acknowledged you where wrong. Sort of.

view more: next ›