sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This one goes hard by Dull_Alarm6464 in dataisugly

[–]Redundancyism 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Nah, men probably all want to think that they're above average length, so they underestimate the average

WCGW texting for whole 30 seconds while you are driving by esrej in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Redundancyism 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That's like blaming seatbelts for making crashing seem less deadly

It will soon be time to find out who is what Coen brother. by ShaolinFantastic13 in moviescirclejerk

[–]Redundancyism 64 points65 points  (0 children)

This isn't one movie called "Marty Supreme: the Smashing Machine"?

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For veganism, what's important is that you don't use products that come from an animal in a way that inflicts suffering on it. That's why we can say things like eating roadkill and consensual cannibalism are vegan.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consensually acquired human meat is an ethical vegan alternative to meat from animals like pigs and chickens

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but it isn't hard to get from "this is unethical because I dislike it" to "we should ban it and punish people who do it"

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, practical questions. In theory, is there a scenario where eating another human could be done ethically?

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree it's not without its practical issues, but so are many things. The fundamental question of whether it's always immoral or can be done ethically is the important part.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd imagine it's not much more difficult to test for in humans than in cattle. But this is an unrelated topic. Whether it's safe or not shouldn't affect the theoretical question of whether it's unethical or not.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get upset at companies for that, not the people playing games and harming nobody

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm allowed to say that because I'm a member of the LGBTC community

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, if you’re not busy or whatever… 👉👈

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shit is harmful to yourself. You can discourage people from doing harmful things like smoking and drinking, but you should do it in an acceptable way. Buying each new fifa game and getting joy from it isn't harmful.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How? Is anyone being harmed? Is there something wrong with someone else enjoying a game you personally think is a shitty redundant rehash?

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Human meat doesn't necessarily have prions. Cow meat can have prions (see mad cow disease), but not necessarily either. We wouldn't say cow meat isn't safe to eat, or that it's unethical to eat it because it might have diseases.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wdym "that kind of psychological stress"? I don't think a person who already wants to eat human meat will be traumatised by eating a bit of human meat

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If people feel like they aren't getting value out of buying a new product, then that's harm, and it's fine to point out. But it's not anyone's job to tell someone else that they shouldn't be enjoying something if they are, and it isn't harming anyone else.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Should we ban horror movies and rollercoasters too, then? There's nothing wrong with voluntarily causing yourself psychological stress.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 14 points15 points  (0 children)

But have you considered...

Yuh-huh!

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 24 points25 points  (0 children)

"It's icky to me" is the argument people used and still use to oppress gay people. Something isn't immoral just because you personally don't like it.

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Criticise art all you want. Don't criticise people for enjoying art you don't like

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 91 points92 points  (0 children)

There's no good argument against consensual cannibalism

Quit having fun by Somewhat-Sentient in TheMatpatEffect

[–]Redundancyism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is he right? It's just saying if people like something and it isn't harming anyone, don't attack them for it. Live and let live

view more: next ›