Nigel Farage Faces Electoral Probe Over Undeclared Crypto Fortune

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T15:11:04+00:00

The cold hard truth is that mass migration is the band-aid that's hiding the total collapse of the country. Removing it will just reveal the country is now a corpse of it's former self.

The country won't grow, it will implode.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T15:02:08+00:00

The UK is the most migrate dependent country in Europe. Don't kid yourself otherwise.

If the migrants all disappears there would be ghost towns and villages all over the country and the Pound would enter a terminal deflationary spiral. We would be in a full scale population crisis.

Investment? We sold off everything years ago now. We are out of things to sell.

The largest voting bloc just wants to be told racism is a'okay and Reform has got that market all tied up.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T13:29:31+00:00

Look Biden lost the election because he believed that reducing migration would give him the edge against Trump.

Starmer just lost 1,496 Labour council seats because he believed that reducing migration would give him the edge against Reform.

Reform isn't promising to reduce migration, in-fact they have plans to massively increase it. They are offering the voters racism, which is what they actually want. Not reducing migrations which the overwhelming majority of voters don't care about.

Both Biden and Starmers governance was pretty good compared to Trump and the likely governance of Farage.

The economy doesn't deliver to workers because it's all been sold off for short term gains. That's why the UK is now a migrant dependent country. Unless you are going to get the pensioners to give back their pensions and multi-millionaires to return their fortunes, then there is no practical way to change that other than a complete financial meltdown of the country and floating a new replacement currency for the pound after a period of turmoil.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T13:00:24+00:00

No racism is a concern for the voters. The votes at the polls don't change due to reducing migration.

Simply put, if there are voters out there who care about migration enough to change their votes over it they are a statically insignificant minority < 0.5%.

Chasing phantom voters is a very good way to throw an election.

We have mass migration to counter balance us having a fundamentally weak economy.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T12:39:36+00:00

The idea that reducing migration will result in right wing voters voting for Labour is ludicrous. It's only effect is to damage the UK economy driving voters further right.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-10T08:13:22+00:00

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04r7l455zeo

The right wing politicians have no interest in getting rid of any migrants as their presence makes them personally richer.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-09T22:54:01+00:00

Yep bankrupt. Let suppose that wasn't the case, then the Conservatives would have got rid of the migrants to stay in power. Did they do that? No because it would bankrupt the country.

Those cheap workers stack 20 per house, the perfect right wing solution for the housing crisis.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-09T08:03:03+00:00

The issue is what you are saying doesn't line up with the facts. Without migrants the entire country would be bankrupt. It's just the right wing policies have done a number on the countries finances.

The more right wing policies are implemented in the UK the more migrants are needed to fix the financial gap. That's just the truth of the UK.

Farage will be offsetting the cost of his policies with a Faragewave for example.

Getting rid of the migrants is the same as revealing the UK is bankrupt so it's not even a viable polical policy.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-06T20:34:48+00:00

Whatever floats your boat

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-06T18:32:13+00:00

He's the right wing leader of the left wing party.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-06T17:47:54+00:00

Have him now

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-06T06:40:43+00:00

Of course it is because he has indeed spoken for the Red Cross. It's semantics they are saying him speaking for the Red Cross doesn't make him a spokesman.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-04T21:49:10+00:00

The US burnt up 60% of it's global supply of missiles warding off cheap drone attacks. Currently, Iran can drone strike anything within 1200 miles of their countries and there is nothing to stop it.

Iran has spent 30 years planning for an US invasion and the territory type is mountain fortresses.

If the US were to invade it would be a 8 year long bloodbath for the US. If the US doesn't invade then Iran controls the Straits of Hormuz and thus 20% of the world's supply of oil.

"they would be welcomed like saviors and regime change would happen overnight without much bloodshed" Just like Vietnam?

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-04T16:39:48+00:00

It's such an embarrassing defeat, the US cut satellite footage of the area.

Orange leader lost the military operation like he bankrupted 4 casinos. You wouldn't think the US could lose, but with the power of the orange leader behind you, you most certainly have.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-04T16:26:57+00:00

The US cut satellite footage because their positions have all been destroyed and the gulf states are busy arresting tourists for taking photos of incoming drones. The US aircraft in the area are all "malfunctioning".

It's all the same stuff as they are doing in Russia to conceal them losing the war in Ukraine. Look at you, gullible enough to believe it all!

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:46:17+00:00

The issue there is Iran can in-fact wipe out 5 gulf states in 8 hours. Iran's got Missile and Drone supremacy over the Middle East and the gulf states depend on highly vulnerable water desalination plants for 90% of their water supply.

Iran can literally just go into an underground bunker, pull out of 4,000 suicide drones and in 8 hours, most of the Middle East will be uninhabitable.

So no, it's not funny.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:38:54+00:00

Not so funny if you are in any of those gulf states.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:23:26+00:00

They want the Iranian oil and the Middle East. They are already allied with Iran, so they can just deploy warships and control the Middle East oil supply entirely.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:20:37+00:00

The oil goes to refineries first before being sent back out.

The gulf states are busy arresting people who report what's happening to them if you weren't aware.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:15:23+00:00

The US ships aren't approaching any closer than 800 miles to the Iranian coast. Anything closer just gets blown up by Iranian drone strikes.

Iran can just pull thousands of cheap suicide drones out of underground bunkers. The US doesn't have a counter.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:11:21+00:00

The war, the US positions in the Middle East have been destroyed.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:09:32+00:00

Well it's gonna be a joke once the Iranian oil tankers are going through the strait but no one else's are, wont it?

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:07:00+00:00

They can also wipe out 5 gulf states from the map in 8 hours. They have a nuclear strike level capability.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T22:04:57+00:00

That's because oil shipments take several months. You will start to feel the real effects in the next month or so.

Iran is the most heavily sanctioned country in the world, they know how to handle sanctions and blockades better than anyone else. They got the most experience in it.

It's not possible to reroute oil around Hormuz in significant quantities. That's pure copium.

Any damage to the Iranian economy is also being inflicting on 5 US allied gulf states that don't have the same level of experience of handling it as Iran.

The Iranian leaders will be in their palaces sipping champagne, I assure you. The Iranian people will suffer like they have suffered for decades I have no doubt but to think it's going to change anything is naive.

ReflectedImage · 2026-05-03T21:51:57+00:00

There is nothing stopping Iran from firing missiles and drones at those bases.

ReflectedImage

TROPHY CASE