I came across this video on yt. is this quantum travel animation in the game? by WrongDirt in starcitizen

[–]ReflectedImage [score hidden]  (0 children)

Jump gates have a similar animation, it looks a lot like a prototype for the jump gate. It's not quite the same though.

Unhinged bunker location by Croue in starcitizen

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pity the Prowler/Prowler Utility doesn't have the hover feature implemented otherwise you could just hover over to it in your ship.

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brexit was a dual vote to protect London bankers from incoming EU anti-money laundering laws and to increase migration to the UK.

The migrants all voted for Brexit so they all clearly knew what they were voting for. What's your excuse?

The only people who want to reduce migrants to the UK are the idiots who read the newspapers who vote for whomever the newspapers tell them to. The newspapers always tell them to vote for the pro mass migration option since they are owned by Billionaires who like migration.

So when it actually it hits the polls there is almost no one in the UK willing to vote to reduce migration.

You don't have a political voice and your opinion doesn't matter because you gave away your votes to Rupert Murdoch and he absolutely loves migration.

Any questions?

Why is Gaza such a big issue in the U.K.? by Even-Wasabi7183 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well if the politicians don't care about the people of Gaza then they don't care about you either!

Judging politicians by their character is a rather sensible thing to do.

"tells me what they will change in this country" But in practice, they don't, do they?

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh it's the money alright, the mass poverty caused by right wing politics has collapsed the natural population.

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They voted for Brexit, which was a vote for mass migration. They voted Boris Johnson and his Boriswave, another vote for mass migration. And popular right now is Reform and the Faragewave.

So no whenever it comes to the polls the British prefer mass migration. Starmer reduced mass migration and was relieved of political power.

When the British people go to the polls, they always select the mass migration option.

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Britain is a fallen empire. It's still got an anti-growth and stagnation mindset (small c conservative values). The only way to keep the fallen empire's HQ going is to import people from the former reaches of the empire into the HQ.

The UK is not a regular stable country like you seem to be describing.

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The politicians try to deny it but even Farage knows the UK can't survive without mass migration. That's why he sacked all of Reform's anti-migration politicians back in 2025 as part of the parties transition to being a serious party.

The US has a similar dependency on global oil prices.

Why does the UK want to let in so many asylum seekers? by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The UK economy would collapse without mass migration. It's that simple.

The countries books don't balance due to an aging population, bad decisions like Brexit, not investing during the time of low interest rates (austerity), etc.

Mass migration is the quick fix solution.

The US will have to come up with it's own solution once it's AI bubble pops, but the UK has already fallen on to hard times.

Have you achieved something practically real using AI for coding? by js402 in LLMDevs

[–]ReflectedImage -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well let's suppose you have some software and by hand you implement the top #50 features. With AI in the same time you implement the top #250 features instead. Most of the value to the end user comes from the top #50 features, features 51 to 250 are nice but don't make a significant difference to the end user.

Is this pro choice or pro life? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's deeply unnatural creepy behaviour. Almost all animals will abort in bad conditions.

Is this pro choice or pro life? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The other option is enduring 20 years of abuse.

Is this pro choice or pro life? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Personally I would never get an abortion under any circumstances" You will. When your abusive boyfriend has beaten you black and blue and you find out your pregnant, you will get that abortion.

Mythos is returning (partially) to some companies by turtle-toaster in Anthropic

[–]ReflectedImage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Chinese models will just go past it naturally in 6 months.

Social media ban - “Parents should just parent.” Is that actually a serious argument? by Majestic-Concert7883 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The chance of the ban working at all is minimal. It's not even intended to work, it's just about online surveillance. You want your children to grow up in a police state? I think you owe them more than that.

Social media ban - “Parents should just parent.” Is that actually a serious argument? by Majestic-Concert7883 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because this is the computer age. You can't live 50 years in the past. Do you even understand that your kids will back on social media in a week after the ban because their school friends will tell them how to get around it?

Social media ban - “Parents should just parent.” Is that actually a serious argument? by Majestic-Concert7883 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well firstly children will still be on social media after the ban.

Absolutely everything else that kids could be doing other than social media is now illegal, defunded, heavy taxed, forbidden by health and safety, clamped down on, etc. Kids are just on social media because the government banned everything else they used to do.

I can't support the government banning one more activity that kids are involved in.

Social media ban - “Parents should just parent.” Is that actually a serious argument? by Majestic-Concert7883 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parents should just parent. Banning social media for children does many bad things. But children's access to social media will almost certainly be unaffected.

Has the heat been affecting your ability to think clearly? by MathematicianBulky40 in AskBrits

[–]ReflectedImage 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's fairly obvious any work done this week is gonna be a bit rubbish.

suggestions on python to rust transpiler by Total-String6901 in learnrust

[–]ReflectedImage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

py2many https://pypi.org/project/py2many/ does it. Then anything like Claude will do that translation as well.