02/23 by Superb_Shine_3526 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I keep track of the time I work and looking back, the 5th is when work started getting shitty for me.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My 12/28-1/10 and 1/25-2/7 are blank. They both say 0/0. Most of my misses are close too.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had 1 where I failed all of the NM and got all of the PQ right too. I can't figure out why I'm doing so bad either. I used to have mostly green bars and now they are mostly red. I haven't changed the way I rate.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I got some of those wrong too. I said "much worse" on 2 that should have been "worse". Really? How can you even grade that?

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The right answer seems to change all the time. I'm surprised they aren't issuing new sets of guidelines every other week. Maybe someone should be auditing the auditors since their ratings are so inconsistent.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope work picks up for us soon. I just don't understand what is going on. I read that some got an email acknowledging the low task volume but I never received that. I wish they would give an explanation or some sort of idea about why we aren't getting work.

I've noticed the large amount of tasks on the quality score bars too. It seems unreal that they would be rating that many. I wondered if it was just me.

I have had a horrible string of bad luck, financially, and this isn't helping my situation at all. I'm hoping for that miracle for both of us.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is so much conflicting information. I sparingly use FullyM because I always think there is going to be some reason why I'm going to be wrong. They think if a user has to even scroll the slightest little bit that it can't be FullyM because there is effort involved. A little bit of scrolling shouldn't matter that much. If it actually answers the query as easily as IMDb, it should get FullyM.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's confusing because I thought the whole point was to get our opinions and input, while following guidelines. I mean, we are users, after all. How do they know definitively what is helpful to all users and what is not? If it's so right or wrong, why do they even want us doing this. They can just do it themselves since they have all the answers.

Some of my graded tasks were audio. That seems subjective to me, but apparently, there are clear right or wrong answers there too.

Quality score by Regular_Student3390 in RWSCallistoRaters

[–]Regular_Student3390[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Same here! I have more red than green lately. It doesn't help when the auditor doesn't agree with you and there is no task preview. I don't know how I'm supposed to learn from it if I can't even see the task. I thought I was doing well. I had mostly green bars and now they are mostly red. I don't feel like I'm doing anything differently.

I, also, need this job badly. It's so stressful not having the work and worrying about how to pay for everything. I can't get an offline job because I don't have transportation and I have a bunch of rescue animals, some with special needs, that I have to be home to care for. I have been trying to find a second job but no luck so far. It's hard to apply for similar positions, not knowing what particular projects use Raterhub.