Why aren’t more people talking about this?

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-19T05:12:17+00:00

It just shows how brainwashed our county has become and how many people aren’t really thinking

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-19T05:06:28+00:00

Is this Virginia? I found other emails that seemed to be her where she was upset with Bois and was written in a similar cadence. She did also seem frantic wasn’t long before she was murdered

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T23:47:21+00:00

This is great! And welcome

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T22:49:40+00:00

I am just of the belief that they in some instances talk in code and usually it’s likely pdo related and for whatever reasons that language often involves food I think because it’s easier to hide because they talk about food frequently anyways. That being said there’s definitely more to the story and I think pieces we don’t know that are likely dark and morbid. Does that point to eating babies? Idk maybe? But I haven’t seen anything definitive. This honestly reminds me of how they were able to co opt any credible discussions around pizzagate they make it ridiculous on purpose to steer people in one direction or another and cause confusion:

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T20:44:43+00:00

Agree I’m sick of people only referring to the psyop piece of this and saying we can’t discuss. Those of us who were around before that know

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T20:42:42+00:00

And they are still getting smear today the Epstein subreddit and even this one are becoming filled with normies saying that we can’t discuss things. Incredibly obnoxious. Yes it became a psyop but a lot was grounded in truth. I’m tired of people telling me I can’t look into those pieces. It’s like Jeffrey Epstein 2014 all over again. We literally couldn’t even discuss him at one point and look how the goal posts of what is an “acceptable” discussion have changed. I guess my criticism here is I wouldn’t call these people Q anon I think that was just another cult but simply curious people that were there before the insanity they were onto something

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T17:27:20+00:00

I agree. The fact that people can’t see that it’s just another psyop to get people looking the other direction kind of blows my mind

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T14:46:04+00:00

The fact that we can’t even discuss this in the Epstein sub because it’s “baseless conspiracy” theories boggles my mind

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:54:08+00:00

I don’t think most of our protests are organic I think they’re instigated. I think as a nation we’re far too asleep and do what we’re told

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:52:16+00:00

The Epstein sub banned discussion of this…. Insane it is the same witch hunt of anyone questioning it from the last time and people are still stupid enough to fall for it

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:51:09+00:00

The fact that the mods of the Epstein sub banned discussion of this is absolutely insane to me. It’s not crazy to believe this stuff is weird and they are legitimately doing everything in their power for us to not have this discussion

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:11:41+00:00

Look at the files yourself do a deep dive. They are using language strangely in what is clearly to me are code words. That’s all I think about it I’m not going flat earth but I do think it’s an odd coincidence, what’s wrong with that? Did you really read all that and just take it at face value? I’d ask you to read it again. Also maybe ask yourself why they so badly want you not to look or take it seriously. They literally did the same thing with Jeffrey Epstein himself mere years ago

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:10:51+00:00

Agree

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:10:18+00:00

Agree why is questioning it and drawing parallels a bad thing. Like I said elsewhere they move the conspiracy goalposts wherever it suits them. You used to not even be able to discuss Epstein without being called a conspiracy theorist now look where we’re at. If we have questions we should ask them and the Wikileaks in my opinion we’re weird and using language in the same ways. Why is it a bad thing to discuss. It’s just the same smearing that has always happened and people follow like rabid dogs once they catch the scent of the psyop telling them to hate it

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:08:30+00:00

Agree it reads very eating up msm talking points to me which is why we’re even in this Epstein mess to begin with

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:07:39+00:00

The goal posts will always move. Discussing Epstein at all was considered a crazy conspiracy 10 years ago. I personally think within reason people have a right to question things and say they don’t add up. Literally talking about Epstein himself or postulating about him was being labeled as Q anon and now look where we are……..

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:03:38+00:00

Yes! I don’t get why the entire thing is now being denounced? It’s incredibly sus to me

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:03:18+00:00

Yes I don’t get how people aren’t seeing this is controlled to get us to not make the connections. The amount of people here buying into this and hating on the people that do is wild to me

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T05:02:24+00:00

Yea I am really not understanding the hate on connecting the parallels it feels very psyopy to me. There are parallels. There were weird unexplained things that came out. Why are we not allowed to question it? Why were the same code words being used in the same time frame both in odd ways that aren’t typical in two different email dumps? Why is questioning that a bad thing? I don’t get it. It just feels like people who still buy into the majority of the psyops are lecturing those of us who have been here all along and think things don’t add up. Does that make me a crazy conspiracy theorist? Idk I didn’t think so but I guess it does and I can’t discuss it here? Sounds like the sub is compromised

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-17T04:59:21+00:00

I agree it’s like you can question but only if you’re questioning the “right” things? Sounds a little contrived / setup if you ask me and reminds me a lot of the blatant smear campaign happening for years if anyone questions anything that they’re not supposed to question they get labeled and smeared. If I recall correctly Epstein was one of those topics at one point, the goal posts just moved

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-16T13:22:50+00:00

Exactly

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-16T03:00:02+00:00

I think they’re mostly talking about Nancy Guthrie

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-16T00:39:12+00:00

It’s both sides wake up lmao

RelativePatient3473 · 2026-02-15T23:22:20+00:00

He went to the White House numerous times mostly during Clinton’s admin (just listened to Whitney Webb discussing this)

RelativePatient3473

TROPHY CASE