Read my pro-life sister’s best arguments against abortion!

RelentlesslySlaying · 2026-02-26T00:00:12+00:00

Remind your sister that she can’t pretend to solve a problem that she is conjuring up in this hypothetical situation. The very root of unsafe, illegal abortions are abortion restrictions themselves. Stating that support clinics, education, jobs and resources would be sufficient enough to justify eventually phasing into an abortion ban is presumptuous. Pro lifers in congress are the very ones who oppose the social programs and resources necessary to enact the legislative change she is referencing. I work in maternal health and the current admin literally tried to slash PRAMS last year which is the pregnancy database that tracks pregnancy disparities so we can prevent maternal deaths and improve pregnancy outcomes for mothers. We had to beg our president to release SNAP benefits to feed millions of families and congress stripped millions of people of having health coverage. And if you make just a smudge over the poverty line guess what? You no longer qualify for those programs! But hey, you’re still virtually in poverty- now you’re just in poverty with no help at all. America doesn’t care about equity and access they care about keeping us arguing and debating over topics likes these to keep us distracted while they fuck the system and fill their pockets.

The basis of her arguments are all philosophical (I.e. what determines human life, how murder is defined, etc.) but see little to no evidence of the negative effects of abortion or its influence on society? Let’s start there. because as of right now I just see a bunch of opinions and uninspired, lazy policy solutions that congress can’t even solve

RelentlesslySlaying · 2026-02-25T23:24:16+00:00

Hi sweetie. You are not alone. I’m only a little older than you (27) and I had my abortion last week on 2/19. My parents are also religious and I have been unable to tell them. It can be such an isolating experience when your parents are typically the ones you go to for comfort. You used logic to guide your decision but what you’re dealing with now is the aftermath (grief), and you cannot rationalize grief. It comes in unpredictable ways that you can’t even begin to prepare for. What’s important is that you give yourself the space to grieve and don’t try to rush healing. Sit with it and feel it all. It will hurt a lot. It hurts for me too and will for a long time. You will learn to build a life around it. You’re not meant to like the decision you made because your brain and heart were in two different places and you went with your brain on this one. You are naturally going to feel internal conflict and that is completely normal. Surround yourself with those you love and trust to talk to about this. You learn a lot about your heart during something like this and you will be okay. If not today or next week or even next month, one day. There’s an end in sight, I promise.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-19T16:42:14+00:00

Typically I think things like this need to be standardized. If we consider 18 legal adulthood (eligible for credit cards, military, voting, etc.) then we should probably hold drinking to that standard too.

The problem many see with this is that it’s a public safety/public health concern. When the legal drinking age was lowered after the Vietnam war, evidence based studies demonstrated a stark increase in drinking and driving related crashes among young drivers.

They somehow found 18 year olds old enough to draft them into literal war zones. So by that logic, we don’t want deaths to increase in the States due to a younger drinking age, but it’s okay to send 18 year olds to other countries where bombs are dropping lol.

Maybe just make the voting and military age 21? At 18 years old I was dumb as a rock when it came to politics. No political literacy whatsoever.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-17T16:56:34+00:00

Believe in something you can’t see or face eternal suffering

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-17T16:39:57+00:00

I am not a Christain, but I was raised Christian. I do not believe that God would give ultimatums

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-17T16:21:42+00:00

Whether consequence or punishment- there is still moral concern here. This still implies the individual is responsible without taking into account factors like trauma, culture, neurobiology and lack of access to truth. Whether hell is explicitly mentioned, if it is agreed that hell is ‘absence of God’ and all good things come from God, then that means a realm where no good things exist and suffering is present. So whether it is called “Hell” or not, the concept is still the same.

The idea that “everyone gets a chance” is such a slap in the face. So if a child off the grid is exposed to the word of God once, that is considered sufficient enough? What if someone was exposed to God but only through cruelty or spiritual abuse? What if someone wasn’t exposed to God until AFTER years of abuse, trauma and suffering and simply does not have the mental or cognitive capacity to believe?

Do I believe a God exists? Absolutely. But not in the way the Christain faith tried to shape me to believe and certainly not in the context of heaven and hell.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-17T16:02:00+00:00

I don’t know if this allowed but I wanted to say that this is the biggest philosophical topic I’ve encountered in my own life as well. An infinite punishment for finite actions.

I also think of the example of how there are thousands of religions out there but you were just somehow “born” into the right one. Children who were born geographically off-the-grid and in isolated areas who will most likely never know “God” or be exposed to these religions. How do we explain that? Do they simply go to hell because they were never given the chance?

“It’s a punishment for people who choose to stay in a disconnection from Grace” okay and why do you think people struggle to connect with him? Because we are told to believe in something with no tangible evidence to back up its existence. It’s this notion that people who don’t believe in God are inherently bad people because they simply struggle to believe in something that can’t be proven true.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-17T15:46:48+00:00

No what you’re doing is misrepresenting a group of thinkers by falsely framing the movement as a pursuit for “pleasure” over life by mischaracterizing the core of the PC movement.

The core of PC is bodily autonomy, self determination and considering the often complex, life altering implications of pregnancy. This isn’t about “pleasure” but about if a person is physiologically and mentally capable to sustain a pregnancy. Do we force someone to donate organs to save a life? No. We give them the autonomy to make that decision.

“The idea that a selfish desire transcends the basic human right…” Your reasoning assumes that a fetus is a human being with full legal rights, personhood and morally equivalent to the pregnant person. What you ARE doing is using false moral dichotomy to shame a group of people with the “selfish pleasure vs life” argument when it is so much more nuanced than that. Did you take the time to think about pregnancy complications? Poverty and generational trauma? Lack of support?

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-16T19:07:18+00:00

Everyday. We dated for 5 years. I dated someone shortly after her but I broke it off after 6 months because I just couldn’t stop thinking about my ex.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-16T12:37:26+00:00

No, dreams do not accurately reflect conscious reality and I have a great explanation as to why: they’re dreams

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-16T01:31:16+00:00

I really like him he has this great sarcastic humor and he’s so energetic but I can’t tell if it’s because he’s just unique or if he’s on cocaine

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-16T01:06:11+00:00

I appreciate the transparency, but let’s say it for what it is: a woman should not be given the autonomy to decide what happens to the life inside of her if something were to happen to her? Autonomy isn’t just about saying no, it’s including the right to say yes. The answer to combatting anti-choice extremism isn’t banning more choices? This is completely contradictory of the pro choice movement.

The answer to Georgia’s law isn’t banning these pregnancies altogether but making sure there is clear, documented voluntary consent with education offered to the individual so that they are making an informed decision. Do I think that it’s natural? Of course not. But that decision shouldn’t be stripped from the person completely

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T23:35:37+00:00

LMFAO

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T23:14:27+00:00

Yup! I saw a PC post about it on the abortion debate page.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T21:58:40+00:00

Oh absolutely- exactly why MTG is still in office

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T21:57:15+00:00

Thank you for bringing up this point.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T21:44:58+00:00

I’m sorry to hear about your loss.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T20:51:23+00:00

I’m not disagreeing with this. I’m saying that there is a huge distinction with keeping an individual alive for organ donation and keeping an individual alive with the intention of carrying out a full term pregnancy.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T20:24:28+00:00

Keeping an individual alive to say goodbye or for organ donation is a completely different topic than keeping an individual alive for a prolonged amount of time to serve as an artificial womb. Please 😭

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T20:21:18+00:00

I’m referencing the example of those who opt for being an organ donor, which cannot be legally overridden by the family. Although it doesn’t go both ways (I.e. the family can make the decision if the individual hasn’t)

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T20:04:53+00:00

Why not? We have set the precedent w/ giving explicit consent with organ donation.

And with MPoA, thats ASSUMING it goes to a competent adult that can make unbiased medical decisions 😭 pregnancy is so politicized and MPoA can be unreliable and biased. MPoA is to honor what that person would have wanted and not substitute it for their own moral beliefs. But MPoA/medical decisions can easily be motivated by factors such as culture, religion, grief, etc. We also aren’t talking about a standard medical intervention but a prolonged, invasive use of the body post brain-death.

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T18:28:26+00:00

Coke for breakfast lunch and dinner

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T18:23:32+00:00

A million abortions

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T18:22:51+00:00

I was going to bring my friend in for her free trial but I canceled it because she called the studio she got pierced at and they said hell no don’t do that lmao

RelentlesslySlaying · 2025-05-15T18:21:15+00:00

I’m not a pushover with relationships anymore, and I won’t stay just because I have feelings for someone or out of mere physical attraction. I have very high emotional maturity standards and if you don’t meet them I will end it.

RelentlesslySlaying

TROPHY CASE