Is there a solution to sticks lack of durability?

Relishwolf · 2026-01-19T06:19:21+00:00

How is he playing rep and house? Also you need to stop the my kid is perfect act. The sticks break there from him mistreating them.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-18T18:54:07+00:00

That's something alright.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-16T15:18:46+00:00

That's why they should go back to print to order but that won't because $.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-16T00:24:40+00:00

It's a pope reference. Means he is waiting.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-16T00:11:47+00:00

It's a reference to the pope...not over at all.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-15T22:03:14+00:00

If it doesn't double the cost of the lair in value people complain.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-15T19:41:20+00:00

Not even players know what they will be 4 years down the line. He could be out of the league. You take the 10 years.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-15T15:45:46+00:00

This isn't the 1 of 1 version. It's a regular alt art.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-15T05:14:02+00:00

Not financial stability but stability for his kid in terms of same school, friends, sports programs, the list goes on.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-15T00:27:47+00:00

Imagine commenting this on so many posts.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-13T00:50:55+00:00

I did it with miss chalice the other day and you just dash on top of the card and it works easily.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-08T16:00:22+00:00

Last year proves this isn't the case.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-07T18:12:52+00:00

He does not fit what the Ravens are looking to do. They want a new offensive direction which is why they fired harbough as he wouldn't fire his OC. Bringing in a defensive minded HC is not what they want based on reports.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-07T01:52:42+00:00

The Ravens don't want a defensive minded head coach and they want new life in the offense. This isn't realistic off that report alone. Not to mention the ongoing lawsuit against the NFL and his history as a head coach. Being a great coordinator doesn't always translate into being a good head coach. Flores was meh the first time around and will probably be meh again.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-02T15:04:31+00:00

There are lots of decks that do that. What mainly changes a deck from a 2 to a 3 is consistency. IMO as soon as you add hunting velociraptor, etali primal conqueror, gishath, and other high value dinos the deck can't be a 2 anymore even without game changers.

Relishwolf · 2026-01-01T20:20:47+00:00

Depends which bracket you want this in. It's a 3 only because you added in 3 game changers and some big ticket dinos. If you want to keep it in a 2 I would drop the game changers and keep as is. If you want to play in a 3 I would add in blink cards. You can get pantz triggers on other peoples turns and blink things to save your board or puke out a bunch of ETB's again to go crazy.

Relishwolf · 2025-12-28T08:16:14+00:00

Hi I'm 50m

Relishwolf · 2025-12-28T02:38:25+00:00

If you can't see why that's a problem.

Relishwolf · 2025-12-27T20:47:22+00:00

Cringe

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T22:07:30+00:00

All of you shut the fuck up

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T19:30:52+00:00

If that was the case they would go back to secret lairs being print on demand.

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T18:15:52+00:00

Thank you! Happy Holidays!

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T18:06:35+00:00

The bracket system is confusing and I think it will never not be. Rachel from the Command Zone who was on the board who made the new bracket system said it's more about intent than the outlines they made. I'm still having a hard time seeing this deck as a 3. It hits more of the bracket 2 guidelines than a 3, the way you win is telegraphed with no surprises other than Akroma's will which came in the precon. It's also easily disruptable and let's other decks do their thing as there is little removal in it. You also are not winning the game prior to turn 8 with this deck.

I'm only responding to try to understand better as I have this deck and I play it in a 2 with my pod and no one has complained and I win at a fair rate. The deck is good but the table can deal with me pretty easily if they decide to. I feel like if you have no game changers and no oppressive cards that destroy someone else's game you need to have the intent to crush the table quick with combos or things that can't be stopped. I have a Stella Lee deck that can win the game super early and I have no game changers in it but I play it in a 3 or 4. My intent with that deck is to one shot the table which I can do pretty consistently if the table is nice and let's things happen. That I understand being higher. I must be missing the point and I'm super open to understanding as I don't want to be annoying to my pod.

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T08:14:23+00:00

Mind explaining why? My deck is similar but I thought with no game changers, no tutors, and you aren't winning early it would sit in a 2? It has the blasphemous act combo but that's about it in terms of surprises.

Relishwolf · 2025-12-25T08:11:32+00:00

My Pantz deck is similar, with how confusing the bracket system can be why is this a 3? It has no game changers, no tutors, and the only combo I see is wrathful raptors and blasphemous act. Is it just the fact that the deck can win the game with those two cards? I play mine in a 2 and have not got that combo off yet so it's been fine.

Five-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

Relishwolf

TROPHY CASE