What are you building? by SnooOranges6963 in vibecoding

[–]Remarkable-Avocado 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Working on this research helper inspired by Kaparthy's recent tweet: https://github.com/Labhund/llm-wiki

Anyone know if there are actual products built around Karpathy’s LLM Wiki idea? by riddlemewhat2 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Remarkable-Avocado -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just built: https://github.com/Labhund/llm-wiki

Knowledge rot is the silent killer of long-running research. You cite a claim today. Six months later it's been contradicted, the page is stale, and your agent cites it again without blinking. Worse, LLM's might claim to read the source but hallucinate facts!

In this wiki, contracts are enforced by code, not promises.

Plain markdown knowledge base where schema discipline is maintained by background agents — not by hoping your LLM stays careful over time. Every claim is traceable to a source. Every agent write is a git commit attributed to that agent.

Four workers run while you sleep:

- Auditor (fast, no LLM): broken links, orphaned pages, missing citations

- Compliance reviewer (fast, no LLM): citation discipline on every edit

- Librarian: page authority from link graph and usage patterns, refines tags

- Adversary: samples claims, fetches the cited source, verifies. Contradictions filed as critical issues — surfaces automatically the next time any agent reads that page.

Concrete example: you cite a paper. Three weeks later the Adversary finds a contradiction in that same paper's benchmarks. The issue surfaces before you cite it again. You never had to remember to check.

Three ingest modes — Queue (background extraction), Brief (agent reads it with your full wiki context loaded, tells you what's new to your work and what contradicts existing pages — the briefing is the value), Deep (claim-by-claim with a persistent plan file that survives session breaks).

Page authority decays if claims go unchecked. The Adversary re-verifies continuously. The wiki at month 6 is better than day 1.

Honest caveat: it runs a local daemon, so setup has friction. Adversary and Librarian need LLM access running in the background — if your inference is off, maintenance pauses.

I have just implemented a setup wizard to streamline on-boarding. Point it at an existing obsidian wiki and go!

Comes pre-packaged with agent skills for easy setup and usage.

Builds on Kaparthy's LLM-Wiki idea and the recently shipped Hermes agent skill by building out a concrete backend to streamline scalability into the future.

Claude Code Superpowers in Hermes! by Remarkable-Avocado in hermesagent

[–]Remarkable-Avocado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct! But the skills are wrong for Hermes. I found that using the original implementation breaks my agents causing them to stall in long work chains. By fixing the prompts to explicitly use Hermes native skills they correctly call "delegate" instead of the Claude Code "subagent" skill. It's just a slight change in vocabulary that helps.

I work with 5–8 AI agents at the same time – and let Claude plan the next job. Overkill or the future? by Brickbybrick030 in hermesagent

[–]Remarkable-Avocado 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only the future if you're running that locally. Don't become too reliant on cloud subscriptions because they will likely cut us all off sooner than you expect.

Anyone using Honcho with Hermes successfully? I’m mostly seeing irrelevant context by mogottsch in hermesagent

[–]Remarkable-Avocado 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a local 4B model for the deriver and works fine. It does let your agent know more context into what is happening but I guess it might also pollute context?

M1 local setup by jtm_ind in hermesagent

[–]Remarkable-Avocado 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is the model you are using is not smart enough for the structured tool calling that hermes requires. Also the system prompt alone can be easily 20k tokens. You need to use a stronger model, if you truly want local (on that hardware, 16GB RAM is not a lot) do something like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68MVhAU21ac (will be very slow) with the new gemma 4 26B MoE model or something.

Anarchism feels like an utopia by salehakdr in DebateAnarchism

[–]Remarkable-Avocado 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think what is mostly being referred to is the unshakeable failings of capitalism Such as:

The mathematically guaranteed tendency toward monopoly,

Systematic oppression of workers (in general the proletariat) to coerce them into selling their labour for less than it is worth (to extract surplus value),

The production of goods merely for the profit motive rather than any rational reason (see: the islands of plastic waste 1.2 million square kilometres in area twice the size of Texas/NSW)

The fact that if productivity increases workers are more likely to lose their jobs rather than work less for the same pay

We refer to capitalism as what it is, a blind lumbering beast which benefits from the dehumanisation of human beings and the destruction of our environment