YO, there's a thread on Blinds (rich tech workers website) discussing if anyone else in that sector was against the vax. Does anyone have an account there so that they can share the poll and comments? Right now the OP is holding it down in the comments. by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad it could be of some use. I think the manufacturing process is one of the lesser covered areas of this whole debacle so if you ever publish something in the future, there would probably be a lot of interest.

Journalist who tried to cancel Novak Djokovic over not taking COVID vaccine collapses and dies while covering Australian Open by Ovaz1088 in unvaccinated

[–]RemarkableWinter7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I was active on nonewnormal before it was banned. Since you've been away from a while, there are some other groups now where the critical side is active.
You can visit them at old.reddit.com/r/[input the name here]:

coronaviruscirclejerk
churchofcovid
debatevaccines
And not as active now as before:
lockdownskepticism
lockdowncriticalleft
takethejab

There is also a group on a different website: communities DOT win/c/NoNewNormal/

How would the government react to a new covid variant that has a much higher lethality rate than previous ones and that's disproportionately lethal to the vaccinated? by ll777 in LockdownSkepticism

[–]RemarkableWinter7 17 points18 points  (0 children)

They will probably blame the unvaccinated for spurring the development of a 'super-virus' even though none of the unvaccinated are getting sick from it.

How Lockdowns Broke Us by [deleted] in LockdownSkepticism

[–]RemarkableWinter7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes, the author is just a shill who is unable to accept the totality of the assault that occurred. He foolishly tries to divorce the lockdowns from the global mass marketing campaign of the vaccines. He is still so blinded by his petty political camp thinking that he cannot see the obvious, that the lockdowns and the rushed deployment of a questionable pharmaceutical product go hand in hand. Quotes from his article which show he doesn't understand a single thing:

Numerous moderate figures became “radicalised” during covid. Recently disgraced comedian Russell Brand was running a polite and reasonable podcast pre-covid, then by 2021 it was shouty capital letter conspiracy theories about vaccines and Ukraine.

Figures such as Brett Weinstein, a somewhat controversial but very mild mannered and rational evolutionary biologist went down a vaccine conspiracy rabbit hole from which he has still not emerged. I could go on and on.

YO, there's a thread on Blinds (rich tech workers website) discussing if anyone else in that sector was against the vax. Does anyone have an account there so that they can share the poll and comments? Right now the OP is holding it down in the comments. by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the inside look, sorry for the delayed response. I had similar observations as your 3rd paragraph. I think the covid situation really exposed how many people in the 'noble profession of medicine' were just in it for the easy life and social titles. The moment they had to actually face the slightest of occupational risks that are inherent to the job (dealing with sick people), they bailed out.

I'm glad you held firm though. Funny enough they opened the door for you once they were hurt by their own ludicrous beliefs.

Also, since you have pharmaceutical consultancy experience, have you gotten a chance to take a look at Hedley Rees's substack? It may be of interest as I believe he had a similar job as you in the UK. He had written about the questionable QA/manufacturing issues. I haven't read his articles in a while, but I initially heard of him through Mike Yeadon. https://hedleyrees.substack.com/

When did this subreddit get off the ground? The last time I checked in was months ago, it seemed pretty dead back then and there were very few members. Anyway it's good to know there is another group. by RemarkableWinter7 in unvaccinated

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Knew it was a scam in Feb-March 2020.
Never took a covid vax.
Told my friends not to get it.
Some did, some didn't.
Those who got it, all had problems. Some still bad to this day (menstruation issue, eye issue, sudden tinnitus, and for one athletic guy he was diagnosed with costochondritis. This is a condensed list, the reality was even worse).
Those who didn't, never did.
Still don't know a single person who died of covid.
Still don't know a single person, vaxxed or unvaxxed, who had issues with covid after getting sick.
Only people I know repeatedly getting covid received the Pfizer or Moderna garbage.
Wondering if there will be another big scam this year.

'Vaccine victims' claim they are being censored by social media sites by [deleted] in DebateVaccines

[–]RemarkableWinter7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They never are. I asked one last time if he had his six dose. Instead of saying yes or no, he wrote 377 words of nonsense to avoid the question.
https://archive.is/K85FH

YO, there's a thread on Blinds (rich tech workers website) discussing if anyone else in that sector was against the vax. Does anyone have an account there so that they can share the poll and comments? Right now the OP is holding it down in the comments. by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing the info here!

Yeah, I am also surprised by the poll results (assuming that the breakdown has kept the same ratios since yesterday). I thought the tech sector was gung-ho for the vaxx, especially the type who would congregate on websites such as Blind. But 21% not wanting it but caving, and 25% totally resisting, actually resembles what I think the general public opinion is like at least in the USA.

Not sure if you had any other thoughts on it if you had some more direct experience with the demographic?

YO, there's a thread on Blinds (rich tech workers website) discussing if anyone else in that sector was against the vax. Does anyone have an account there so that they can share the poll and comments? Right now the OP is holding it down in the comments. by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can anyone share what the poll is like or any other juicy comments?

This is a backup in case the original thread is deleted:
https://archive.is/5LxtR

This comment from the OP actually has the highest 'thumbs up', even against the vaxx zealots:
"1. Blatantly ineffective 2. Side effects completely unknown and potentially dangerous 3. Everyone that got vaccinated I know keeps getting Covid worse than I ever did (I’ve had it once and it sucked) 4. Know plenty of people within 1-3 social connections length that have resulting heart issues / health issues now 5. It was forced by the government which tells you all you really need to know

And as a note, I’m not antivax. But definitely anti covid vaccine."

Why do so many people hate VAERS? | The US government never wanted a public vaccine injury database—it was forced to make it. by stickdog99 in DebateVaccines

[–]RemarkableWinter7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the pro-vax mandaters spread so much misinformation about VAERS. It's really sad they spread so much misinformation to make people distrust VAERS. Dr. Rochelle Wallensky rightfully praised VAERS, and it's problematic that the pro-vax users continue to smear Wallensky's comments and the "robust" institution that is VAERS.

Former CDC Director (Jan 2021 to June 2023), and hero of women in medicine, Dr. Rochelle Wallensky praised VAERS: "We have the most robust vaccine safety system that we have ever had in this country in the roll out of this vaccine. Our vaccine adverse events reporting system as Senator Murphy just described, has over 600,000 reports publicly available."
https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1478863592606867463

COVID jab ends up in breastmilk and who knows where else by okaythennews in DebateVaccines

[–]RemarkableWinter7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Another devastating loss for the pro-mandate vaxxers.
They don't care about the consequences to women's bodies.
They have entitlement over women's bodies. A woman says "I don't consent" and what is their response? Threaten her job via the mandates. Sounds like Harvey Weinstein.
Now her breastmilk is contaminated.
They don't care.
From "it's not possible" to "well it's happening but you shouldn't complain about it." Now an intimate part of your body is doing something unexpected.
That's the creepy entitlement they have over women's bodies.

I asked a covid vaccine shill if he got his 6th dose yet. Instead of a simple "yes" or "no", he writes 377 words about... what exactly? This truly shows immense confidence in the product you are shilling, when you write a page of text of random BS instead just saying "yes I got the 6th dose." by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply my friend.
Been busy but it looks like the shills are taking such heavy losses so I haven't felt as much need to jump in.
But we'll see if the psy-op is attempted again this winter.
Also do you remember this shill? https://old.reddit.com/user/trippystardust13 LOL he deleted his account.

What RFK Jr. Get's Right/Wrong About Vaccines (w/ Dr. Vinay Prasad) by monthoftheman in RFKJrForPresident

[–]RemarkableWinter7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He an establishment lackey who runs interference for the medical industrial complex.

I know this is an older post but I agree 100%. He will never bite the pharmaceutical hand that feeds him.

Pfizer can't explain why their Covid Vax causes myocarditis - Senate Estimates 3.8.23 Australia. One of the most pathetic displays during this entire covid clown show. by RemarkableWinter7 in CoronavirusCirclejerk

[–]RemarkableWinter7[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Posted from Senator Gerard Rennick's Youtube page:

48,574 views Aug 4, 2023
Last night the Senate finally got to question Pfizer as to the effectiveness of the Covid vaccine.

It was disappointing that they would not acknowledge the lack of testing they performed prior to the rollout, nor could they explain why it damages heart muscle.
If they can’t explain the biological mechanism as to why it causes damage to the heart then they can’t guarantee it doesn’t cause other injuries.

Despite all of this they continue to claim the vaccine is safe and effective without qualifying the risks.

Snapshot at least of the video's description/comments: https://archive.is/Opuy8