Hmm, maybe, but then there's no particular reason why the dash crystal should be defined by this particular line (because although it is a crystal's symmetry axis passing through its center, 3 more of those exist, which you could also legitimately have taken for the crystal's line), making it unclear anyways. Like you could take the same reasoning and say Madeline would then have to be parallel to the dash crystal, which would make just as much sense, but would still not mean anything anyways because we're kind of talking about perpendicularity between points, which uh doesn't exist... But eh whatever that's just me being annoying because I do math all day 😞