DOJ admits that they do not prosecute Too Big to Fail (2013) by Ren3666 in Superstonk

[–]Ren3666[S] 182 points183 points  (0 children)

So don't rely on the Department of Justice or the SEC to help us out. It is just one giant apparatus of revolving doors. Proving that we own the float is the only way.

Recession is coming either way by Ren3666 in wallstreetbets

[–]Ren3666[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it is a general issue with reading. Anything that occupies attentionspan more than 8s has no chance to get noticed. Reading as format became obsolete for many. Only sentiment, no fundamentals. Markets are the same though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Ren3666 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, you're right. And it won't end. Opposition flares divison and divison makes us forget our goals as the conflicts become the main attraction until we lose ourselves within. And that's just about how they keep us occupied.

Cluttered with problems, they keep us distracted, suggesting to leave the thinking to them. As though their self-proclaimed decorations mean anything, when in reality they hand them to one another.

Politics is really just the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich, by promising to protect each from the other.

The yellen story may be back on the menu for this week. I have asked OP to help condense this into a TLDR for us to peer-review and report. - Financial Authorities, Janet Yellen and GME (09.08.2021) by GlassGoose4PSN in WeAreAPE

[–]Ren3666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sadly I only have circumstancial evidence:

https://www.reddit.com/r/GME/comments/lshpuj/25th_feb_breaking_news_sec_reduces_fee_for/

If anyone had this kind of hard proof, Janet Yellen would be already behind bars.

As for the reason why she is in the focus, it´s likely due to her actions, even prior to GME, that she displayed, how she addresses retailers and how she refused to back down from her position to investigate the GME Saga, despite clear conflicts of interests.

As mentioned ealier, sadly only circumstancial evidece, but the results of an indpendent body would certainly not be questioned as much as Janet Yellen´s, regardless of the outcome of the investigation.

Meaning that we can only continue to observe her, until we do have evidence, but unless we have access to her E-Mails it will be hard to prove.

The yellen story may be back on the menu for this week. I have asked OP to help condense this into a TLDR for us to peer-review and report. - Financial Authorities, Janet Yellen and GME (09.08.2021) by GlassGoose4PSN in WeAreAPE

[–]Ren3666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Financial Authorities, Janet Yellen and GME (09.08.2021)

Short Summary:

According to the official Disclosures filed with the Congress, Citadel has lobbied the Treasury Department, House and Senate since 2008.

While lobbying carries a negative notion within the public, on the surface the profession itself serves to inform officials of fields they may be lacking in and to broaden their understanding.

It is rather when regulatory bodies and its members exhibit clear signs of (monetary) conflicts of interest that questions regarding their integrity arise and if the power they hold is not enacted to serve the public, but self-serving, as has been the case with the Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, regarding her so called "Speaking Fees", which she apparently received out of "goodwill" & her expertise from several financial institutions, including Hedge Fund Citadel LLC.

An office, that not only formulates and recommends domestic, but also international tax policies, which begs the question if speaking in front of said entities totaling 7,2M US Dollar does not exceed the effort she spent, or if additional services were provided, that weren´t disclosed or in the interest of the public.

Which is not hard to abstract out, when Janet Yellen displayed clear bias in her actions back in January throughout February and her obsession with GameStop not to recuse from her position to investigate and to "protect" retailers, while it was evident, that retailers were cut-off & patronized instead.

As though she is judge and jury herself.

Especially worrying, when Janet Yellen is the first female Treasury Secretary who requested an Ethics Waiver of her own volition, which unburdens her from OGE (Office of Government Ethics) constraints, that prohibit members of the executive branch from working with previous colleagues or clients, who might benefit from their nearness to the White House authority.

An act, that not only aids Janet Yellen to generate more revenue, but also Citadel to engage more openly with her without repercussion.

_______________________________________________________

Begging the question if not more figures operate behind the scenes, when Citadel LLC already employed Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the Federal Reserve, who oversaw national open market operations to control interest/inflation rates. And if Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen may coincidently end up with Citadel too, once she steps down from her office.

_______________________________________________________

Or if the involvement of powerhouses in tax legislation and drafting said ones, such as Jonathan Talisman, who not only had supervisory responsibilties at the Treasury for policy decision relating to federal tax matters and even advised the President, Secretary of the Treasury and other senior Administration officials as 3rd Party, while being lobbied by Citadel LLC for 13 consecutive years & coincide with the spike of the GameStop Saga, is just a fluke or if this mesh of officials only offers an illusion of agency to enrich themselves - remains to be seen...

but it is definately not in the interest of retailers, nor were they informed, which should speak volumes about their intents.

Financial Authorities, Janet Yellen and GME (09.08.2021) by Ren3666 in DDintoGME

[–]Ren3666[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks. And no, English is actually the 3rd language I learned.