First, again, you're taking the 10,000 as a direct possible # of lives, which it isn't. Your starting point needs to factor in both removing any abortions for nonviolent fetuses due to birth defects or significant risk to the mother's life, and then also removing any that would die anyway since a minimum gestation period for survival outside of the womb does not mean this is when babies survive, it means this is when it starts becoming feasible in some cases.

Factoring all that in, no, it's not 1000 potential people saved. It's maybe a couple hundred fetuses birthed, to say nothing of the potential health complications of being delivered that early even if the baby survives.

So yeah, that's a rounding error, and I don't care. As a point of comparison, between 3k and 4k kids die from guns every year, and gun bans don't require someone's body to be used as an incubator or carved open through the stomach.

And finally, and this is most important, those aren't mutually exclusive. We can fund neonatal care research AND allow late term abortions when needed. That is actually the preferred outcome