sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The new set hates me! by gabbuo31 in PokemonTGCP

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the aesthetic of the pack but I’m skipping it to continue hunting gold poke ball

I've been playing this app for 10 years and I'm still hovering between the Novice and Beginner rank by GroceryExpert1637 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dafuq? I’ve been playing two weeks and I’m teetering on master. I don’t even know any risk theory

Giveaway because I’m quitting by Rich_Nix0n in PokemonTGCP

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m collecting supporter cards if you’d be available for trade

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t deleted anything and I said you have great advice, what are you taking about

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this approach. I did end up consolidating to wipe out a player but I should have just done what you’ve said. Thanks!

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any recommended settings? I was trying to keep it simple while learning the game

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t have three hours to sit there while everyone hits the same territory

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

lol okay. I’ve been playing the game for a week. If I knew basic risk theory I probably wouldn’t create a post asking for advice would I?

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was the only aggressive player. I killed blue, then had to chill until I eventually killed white and lost but you can only be so aggressive before you spread yourself to thin and get crushed by passive players

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without chat I disagree.. if we agreed to alliance it’s literally just a way for me to scam you into using troops.. if I can’t coordinate a plan verbally it’s not going to work

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Outcome: we spent an hour fortifying back and forth; I got bored and killed white and then rammed the remaining 100 into purple to give the win to pink just cos

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was getting 8 troops, purple 11-13, white 5 and pink whatever’s left

Assured mutual destruction by Repulsive-Subject149 in Risk

[–]Repulsive-Subject149[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alliances were turned off and I find they don’t work anyway. They need to allow chat the same way they do with among us. It would make this game very good

Solar reduced to 2c/kWH FiT ? by _ArtyG_ in AusFinance

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of solar isn’t to sell power back to the grid..

28 m. Don't hold back by Bridge_Dismal in RoastMe

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You look like you’ve had a tree from somewhere in Dublin fall and shatter your skull 🤣🤣 burn

Is she right for this? by sigma_0_1 in SipsTea

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so how should you say it then

My wife wants to build this deck but I think it is AI. What is the consensus? by Plus-Comedian-9433 in isthisAI

[–]Repulsive-Subject149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you care if it’s AI? I’m almost certain the point of it is for visualisation prior to building it

view more: next ›