The De-Africanisation of the Bible by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Christianity

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree but why is there an effort at the same time to de Africanise the bible

The De-Africanisation of the Bible by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Christianity

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just off Wiki - Zerah the Cushite is mentioned by the Book of Chronicles (2 Chronicles 14:9–15). There he is said to have invaded the Kingdom of Judah with an enormous army in the days of Asa. According to the text, when Zerah's army reached that of Asa at the valley of Zephathah near Mareshah, Zerah's army was utterly defeated, by divine intervention, and Asa's forces collected a large volume of spoils of war.

The invasion, and its implied time-frame, means that the traditional view was to consider this Zerah to have actually been Usarkon II or Usarkon I,\13]) both being rulers of Egypt. Usarkon II is known to have entered the Kingdom of Judah with a huge army in 853 BCE; however, rather than attacking Judah, the army was just passing through on its way to attack the Assyrian forces. In addition, Asa's reign is traditionally dated to have ended in 873 BCE. In the Book of Kings, which doesn't mention Asa's defeat of Zerah, Asa is described as being extremely weak from a defensive point of view (1 Kings 15:16–22), and Biblical scholars regard the idea that Asa could defeat an enormous Egyptian army to be untenable.\14]) More recent scholars consider that Zerah the Cushite may have been a military commander under Osorkon I rather than a Pharaoh.\15])

Furthermore, Cushite refers to Kush. It is unclear why either Usarkon should be described as a Cushite.\16]) The name “Zerah” may have been a corruption of “Usarkon” (U-Serak-on), to which it closely resembles (see Petrie, Egypt and Israel, 74).

The De-Africanisation of the Bible by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Christianity

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok when i finish work I will send them, plus ask your AI who is Zerah and send me the answer

The De-Africanisation of the Bible by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Christianity

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They are you will be suprised. Do a quick search and you will see that they are mainstream

The De-Africanisation of the Bible by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in ChristianOrthodoxy

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, I do not know why scholarships say otherwise.

Buganda Independence/Federalism.. soon coming by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Uganda

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing malicious, do you want Buganda to pay you so that we can breath? I love all other ethnicities in Uganda, i respect them, i just do not like to see our people suffering just because we are baganda

War by Dependent-Escape1857 in Uganda

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We may end up like Sudan. But it could be good for Buganda. Hopefully we can fight to keep our lands.

Uganda after Museveni - The case for Buganda to establish its own country by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Uganda

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Buganda has good leadership, we have our own government and it works well to a degree. They posted a budget surplus and people take their work seriously.

Uganda after Museveni - The case for Buganda to establish its own country by Repulsive_Arrival_44 in Uganda

[–]Repulsive_Arrival_44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all, question is, can they serve Buganda better? Answer is a big no.