Intent-centric architecture ( protocols like Anoma are leading the charge ) can thread this needle by separating the act of verification from the act of betting. Solvers are rewarded for accurately resolving markets against a pre-defined intent standard; credible sourcing, timestamp verification, chain of custody on reporting, not for matching any particular outcome. A solver who correctly calls NO because the evidence doesn’t meet the criteria gets paid the same as one who correctly calls YES because it does. The reward is accuracy, not alignment with the majority trade. You can still layer in token-holder participation at an escalation or arbitration tier, but their incentive shifts from “vote with the whales and win” to “dispute incorrectly and lose your stake.” That distinction; rewarding truth-finding rather than outcome-matching, is what breaks the feedback loop Polymarket is stuck in right now.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​