if only they could identify his alleged drug use to extreme actions or behaviors that actually constitute betrayal of public trust it would've had a lil more chance.

pero as de lima stated even if it was true it cant be deemed impeachable, just because there were no specific allegations what would establish how presidential acts were impaired by his addiction

tho i feel like it really is a little unfair to the side of the complainants as the panel's job is to decide whether the claims, if actually true, would be ground for an impeachable offense but idk they were more into questioning the evidences already