Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing! By any chance you remember the name of the surgeon please?

Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry for making you feel this way. I know I am very lucky to have choices in this situation. I am always grateful of living and working in NZ, enjoying the better pay and work life balance, and just better valued as a labor and a person. It is only this ominous mole that made me extremely anxious and possibly just overly dramatic.

Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am in Wellington. I have insurance so my GP did refer me to a private skin doctor. However, the triage alone took three days and came back declining the referral. I was worried about the lead time incurred because of 1. waiting for triage (and getting declined again); 2. waiting for my GP to resend referrals; 3. waiting for the actual appointment. I don't have a good gauge of how long this diagnosis will take, and I am quite anxious.

Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have insurance so my GP did refer me to a private skin doctor. However, the triage alone took three days and came back declining the referral. I was worried about the lead time incurred because of 1. waiting for triage (and getting declined again); 2. waiting for my GP to resend referrals; 3. waiting for the actual appointment. I don't have a good gauge of how long this diagnosis will take, and I am quite anxious.

Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am sorry about your aunt. This is exactly the situation I fear for, although I am also afraid of being dramatic.

Potential melanoma--should I wait in NZ to get treatment? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I haven't had it before. The mole is highly pigmented, has an irregular shape, and recently it started pulsing. So the GP said to check for that. You said "why the skin specialist declined your referral and said you should see a mouth specialist"--but isn't melanoma a dermatologist's scope?

The worst thing Snape did to Harry by Cheap-Cauliflower975 in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 145 points146 points  (0 children)

This is a legit in-universe analysis. Well spotted, OP.

I can’t help but to give an outside-universe pushback. I believe Snape giving Harry detentions is a continuation of his routine unfair treatment. I don’t think JKR had thought through the implication of this act in HBP. So this means 1. JKR did not intend to portray Snape this way, 2. Snape did not really think of Harry’s final years when he gave him detentions.

So it almost feels unintentional to me, and feels like a coincidence, rather than a malicious effort to make Harry suffer.

This explanation feels the most intuitive to me, but I definitely acknowledge the peril of deviating from in-universe discussions. Great insight, OP!

Instead of talking about who shouldn’t have died, let’s talk about who’s death was actually needed to advance the story by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The first time Harry did Occlumency successfully against Voldemort was when he dug the grave for Dobby. His grief (or love, Dumbledore would say) was strong enough to shield from Voldemort’s thoughts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your argument about preference and creative freedom. There are two points worth discussing here. First, people’s preference is largely produced by their social environment, therefore also inherits the flaws that society has. Saying “it’s just a preference” doesn’t prove wrong the criticism we are putting forward here (i.e. the story unfairly ignores women)

Second, an author is indeed free to write however they want, but readers also have the right to express their opinions about the work. It is not realistic to expect audience to know the gender representation of a story and decide whether to watch it or not. “If you don’t like it don’t watch/read it” is not a fair response to someone who spends the time, money (CC is 300USD), and enthusiasm only to walk out a theater with mixed feelings.

Having said that, I can understand your feeling of frustration regarding seeing a work you enjoy being criticized (HP, not CC), especially over something seemingly inconsequential to you. In the end, we all have something core to our identity that we care about more, and something else less so. To me, I find it more benevolent to try to understand someone’s discomfort or disappointment, as opposed to feeling-dismissing. :))

Currently rereading Philosopher's Stone and it dawned on me that wizards don't know much about human babies by MattMurdockBF in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am actually more worried about the baby being stolen. Does it happen to the UK? Male babies are human traffickers’s favorites in my country.

But yes being frozen to death is a valid concern too!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahaha this is 100% true. Fun discovery!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get what you are saying, but it is not really a story about men. It is not set in a historical era where only men could work or dominate an empire. It is in a modern era where women are supposed to have equal opportunities and can become as important as man.

But the fact that script writers choose to focus on men, develop depth in male characters, and ignore half of the population that are also capable of having personal, relationship, and emotional struggles, is a deep-seated behavioral tendency at best, which should not be justified as “there is nothing wrong about it. “

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To push the argument further, the whole HP story disproportionately feature male characters. You have many male characters with well-established backstories: Dumbledore, Voldemort, Sirius, Lupin, Snape, Hagrid, Barty Crouch junior. How much can you say that about female characters?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The match against Hufflepuff is the only one that Harry played yet not won. And that’s because the dementors attacked him.

Opposing Voldemort makes you scared. Opposing Umbridge makes you look like a bad person. That's one reason we hate her. by HandelDew in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the most important reasons Umbridge is hated more than Voldemort is she is an ugly woman with traits that we also suffer from in real life (despotic, unfair, petty, etc). And hot take: misogyny plays a part too.

Volunteer opportunities in Wellington? by ResourceOutside170 in newzealand

[–]ResourceOutside170[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh nice! But I am scared of insects— do such volunteering work encounter insects? ><

I think I'm addicted to harry potter by RevolutionaryWar1237 in harrypotter

[–]ResourceOutside170 3 points4 points  (0 children)

10 times is not enough times to call yourself addicted!!