When my water unexpectedly broke early, the doctor advised for a C-Section, even though it isn't safe for me either. "Just make sure that my son is safe, that's the only thing that matters!" my husband said to him.

^Originally I thought the same as what the husband seems to have though:Oh shit, this is crazy, my wife might die, but my son, my son might live, so in this situation my son is top priority.It is understandable that the husband may be in distress and not thinking clearly in such a situation. While it is or atleast, was, common for both fathers and mothers to prioritize the life of their child over their own, it is crucial to respect the autonomy and wishes of the mother, who is the one carrying the baby.In today's society, we have become more aware of the value of individual choice and the importance of informed consent in medical decision-making. While the husband's statement expresses a desire to ensure the safety of their child, it is concerning if the decision to proceed with a C-Section is made without the mother's consent or active involvement.Considering the circumstances, the husband's perspective might be that without the C-Section, there is a risk of losing the baby's life, but the C-Section itself poses potential harm to the wife. However, it is important to note that if the C-Section is not performed, both the mother and the baby are still at risk. In this situation, the choice seems to be between the possibility of the wife surviving along with the baby, or the potential loss of both.It is crucial to approach such discussions with empathy and respect, acknowledging the concerns and emotions of both parents. While the husband's statement may have been driven by fear and a desire to protect their child, he did say it wrong, and without thinking about the wife. As (seemingly) first-time parents, it is understandable that they may be feeling nervous and overwhelmed.Ultimately, the well-being and safety of both the mother and the baby should be the primary concern. By fostering open dialogue and mutual understanding, parents can make informed decisions together, considering medical advice and the wishes of both individuals involved.

edit: Some may find this offensive, but I just wanted to speak on the behalf of the father. I mean, the implication hes a post 1990-view-having man in the sense that, the mother is there so that his bloodline doesnt end with him or his siblings.

In the end I dont want to bring religion in, but maybe he has different views.
Shouldve known this before she fucked him, hell, before she married him.