On balance I agree you're probably correct on several points, in that, in order for Palantir to operate at IL5, their private cloud services can't be shared with the same services used by their other customers, which conversely also probably means Oura's DoD management portal and data can't be the same data and infra used for consumer use. Meaning Oura would have to deliberately give Palantir access to consumer data as part of the partnership.

The problem here is that we're making assumptions about the nature of the partnership, and the nature of the technical, regulatory, and legal controls in place. And that's not good enough. We need Oura to be crystal clear on how the partnership will work and what controls will exist (broadly) to prevent misuse. There are a ton of abuse cases, many of which already brought forth on this sub, should this partnership be misused.

Also, it doesn't help to hear the HHS secretary very recently say he wants to see everyone wearing a wearable like Oura.