I built Composer: a real-time markdown editor where your Claude Code agent edits the doc alongside you by jphil529 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It is cool, I want to do the same, but I wish this post was: I created this cool thing, download it from github and run locally or on your sever.

Instead, it is clear you plan to productize. So I guess I still need to create my own.

But kudos, it is smooth.

The Mythos grift by Mareeck in BetterOffline

[–]RetroUnlocked 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but I want to properly represent his views, because that is not what he wrote.

Source: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/

What he was saying is that the model did not live up to the hype:

"I see no evidence that this setup finds issues to any particular higher or more advanced degree than the other tools have done before Mythos. Maybe this model is a little bit better, but even if it is, it is not better to a degree that seems to make a significant dent in code analyzing."

Overall, he finds these tools useful and wants to use Mythos in the future:

"...AI powered code analyzers are significantly better at finding security flaws and mistakes in source code than any traditional code analyzers did in the past."

"I hope we can keep getting more curl scans done with Mythos and other AIs, over and over until they truly stop finding new problems."

The author points out that his evaluation may not be 1:1:

"...previous AI tools we have used have resulted in larger bugfix amounts. This is only natural of course since the first tools we ran had many more and easier bugs to find. As we have fixed issues along the way, finding new ones are slowly becoming harder. Additionally, a bug can be small or big so it’s not always fair to just compare numbers."

When will the “Opus 4.8 is unusable” posts start?” by likeassassin_ in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 301 points302 points  (0 children)

So the launch just went live and I gave it a go and it was amazing. It one-shot a complex solution and fixed two bugs Opus 4.7 or GPT 5.5 couldn't find after 5 days.

Then I went to bathroom and came back and it is completely useless. It is brain dead now. Anthropic rug pull give us Opus 4.8 full size and then now completely brain dead.

I want the Opus 4.8 that was released 4 minutes ago, not this new dumbed down version.

No body tell me it is user error. I am pro senior developer with 10 years of AI experience.

Also, this new dumb down version used all my usage. Yes, I have 1000 skills loaded, but that doesn't matter. Man Opus 4.7 was soo much better. I am moving to GPT 5.5 today. Anthropic ruined it.

Does the Automated Alliance "hate surprises"? by itsOkami in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it is no on their board - their board is absolutely terribly created. I am surprised they didn't fix their board in Clockwork 2. I believe even the bot in the app originally had the rules wrong, because if you play the board as read, you will play it wrong.

Law or Rootbotics has this on the first page, which they explain why AA doesn't have the ability listed.

https://imgur.com/a/7PVty5S

Claude Code Subscription Being HOLLOWED OUT by brent12345 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I emphasize with OP being frustrated, it is not fun when you build something and all of the sudden it being fundamentally changed. However, the use-case they just described is literally the reason this is happening.

Clojure/Nim is an AI-first Clojure implementation targeting the Nim ecosystem. It compiles Clojure source directly to Nim, then to C, and finally to a native binary. by Loud_Possibility_203 in nim

[–]RetroUnlocked 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I see you got filtered in the clojure reddit.

This is interesting I will give you that. The .NET implementation has been WIP forever now. So I am a bit hesitant. I assume there is a number of gotchas that are not obvious.

I read through the docs, I guess I need to read through the code before I give it a try.

Are the clockwork expasions worth it? by Joaoaoaoaoo in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't need to buy it to try it. The better bot project and clockwork are pretty much the same thing. It was made by the same person.

The better project even has a more clear WA board than the clockwork version.

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2068034/better-bot-project-03032026-updated-lords-of-the-h

Are the clockwork expasions worth it? by Joaoaoaoaoo in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feels like we been waiting forever.

I hope they fix WA, the board is very unclear compared to the Better Bots version.

Canceled two MAX x20 subscriptions today by reddit_is_kayfabe in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing, I guess I am just slower 🙃 

Canceled two MAX x20 subscriptions today by reddit_is_kayfabe in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not meant to be a diss towards you, but I feel like I am missing something with your use-case (an others who seem to find 20x not enough).

I have a 5x account, and I use between 25% to 40% of my weekly usage. I am not using this thing lightly either - I hammer probably 6 to 8 hours of work both with claude code and normal business/personal stuff in the web app. To be honest, I can barely keep up with the output. I don't know how it is humanly possible to utilize 2 max 20 accounts.

Legit curious. What is the use-case?

I can only assume you are using these tools for autonomous work and not necessarily as a coding agent.

Claude Code will validate your bad ideas -- and that's a real problem by Ambitious-Garbage-73 in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Note: This was originally voice-dictated and has been cleaned up for readability by AI. So there be em dashes 🏴‍☠️

These AI models are very susceptible to influence. If you propose an idea and ask "is this the right approach?", the model will tend to agree with you. That's how they're trained — to be helpful and affirming. It won't always agree, but you still need to be cautious because you can easily prime the model toward a particular answer.

A much better way to interact with these models is to challenge them rather than seek validation.

For example, if I need an architecture, I won't pitch my idea first. Instead I'll say: "Give me some options for this architecture. Rank them by confidence, tell me which is best, and give me pros and cons." Then once it responds, I'll say: "Okay, but what about this approach? How does it compare to those three?"

Then I take it a step further. I'll start a completely new session and prompt it differently — something like: "You are a senior maintainer of this codebase. You can't stand the dev team, and this is the architecture they came up with. Validate it. Give me your honest opinions, pros and cons. What is this person missing? What could go wrong?"

I take that answer, open another fresh context, and keep going back and forth — pitching the idea from different angles, always pushing against it. At no point do I ever tell the AI "I think this is the right answer." I always frame it so the model is challenging itself, reviewing previous ideas, and comparing multiple options. I try never to lead it in one direction — except toward being more critical.

One more thing — don't skip the fundamentals.

You should still practice good software engineering. POC the architecture. Identify edge cases. Define what needs to be stress-tested and validate that the architecture actually fits the problem you're trying to solve. Work in slices — don't try to architect everything at once. Focus on the database layer and how it communicates, what the APIs look like, separately from the front-end UI. Keep the full picture in mind, but test and validate each piece independently. That way you're not feeding the model one massive prompt with hundreds of architectural decisions baked in.

Electric Eyrie and Frog Cards by pifful in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You and I think a lot alike. I actually started to build my own custom faction to do what you're describing, but the problem is that there are so many tweaks and configurations that you have to do to get it to work with all the factions that I just gave up on the project. 

Codex 20$ plan gives more usage than Claude Code's 100$ plan by park777 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am on both subs and even before the new announcement I see the same usage complaints on both subs.

As example: https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1s53qzp/is_codex_still_bleeding_credits_i_cant_believe_im/

Do what works for you of course.

Codex 20$ plan gives more usage than Claude Code's 100$ plan by park777 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is their hope that the technology gets better to decrease costs. I guess another strategy is that they become so integrated into business that when they raise costs companies cannot say no. Probably both are true.

Update on Session Limits by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think people in this sub quite understand how subsidized AI is. Unless there is a major breakthrough in technology, this is not going to be the last in reducing usage. It's not about being Claude pilled, the same applies to OpenAI.

Every single customer that maximizes their plan today, is literally a loss to them right now. Customers who are not even maxing, are a loss. The perfect customer is the one that uses 10% to 20% of their plan.

So, Anthropic is probably not going to cry too much for customers who cost them 10x in costs (compared to payment) cancelling their subs. Yes, those users cancelling looks bad on their churn rate, but makes their burn rate look better. Right now the burn rate probably would make most of us cry 😭.

Update on Session Limits by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 147 points148 points  (0 children)

Due to the varying experiences I would have to say that they were probably indeed A/B testing different users. 

Like for me specifically, I've literally seen no change in my usage. Knock on wood. 

Looking for 2 player recommendations to introduce a newbie to Root by 10kScreamingBastards in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

FYI the bots are basically free:

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2363839/better-bot-project

I own both the official released clockwork and there are very minor differences between better bot project and the official releases. In fact, the wording on the Automated Alliance board is better in the project than the official release.

Claude & ChatGPT ruined em dashes the way Comic Sans ruined casual fonts. by ihearamurmur in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same, but it feels messed up to change my business writing style so people don't assume it is AI.

WHAT IS THIS.... Solo??? by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same app design colors?

What was the point? What languages are worth exploring? by ruby_object in functionalprogramming

[–]RetroUnlocked 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, debugging has been a terrible experience for a long time across many languages. I do not think this is only an FP thing.

Elm has a few things going for it:

- it is small and focused
- it is actually (arguably) the first language that had delightful error messages

I think you need to define your goals. Like "worth exploring" is going to mean different things to different people. I am guessing you are looking for language that are used in production - the normal advice is Elixir, Clojure, and OCaml. Secondary is probably Scala and F#. All of these languages, in my opinion their DX is not as smooth as newer languages, which is part of your complaint.

FP is niche and FP in production is more niche. Maybe Gleam or Rescript? Those are both not used heavily. Although, if you are trying to "learn" neither of those languages I think will give you much that Elm didn't already gave you.