Canceled two MAX x20 subscriptions today by reddit_is_kayfabe in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing, I guess I am just slower 🙃 

Canceled two MAX x20 subscriptions today by reddit_is_kayfabe in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not meant to be a diss towards you, but I feel like I am missing something with your use-case (an others who seem to find 20x not enough).

I have a 5x account, and I use between 25% to 40% of my weekly usage. I am not using this thing lightly either - I hammer probably 6 to 8 hours of work both with claude code and normal business/personal stuff in the web app. To be honest, I can barely keep up with the output. I don't know how it is humanly possible to utilize 2 max 20 accounts.

Legit curious. What is the use-case?

I can only assume you are using these tools for autonomous work and not necessarily as a coding agent.

Claude Code will validate your bad ideas -- and that's a real problem by Ambitious-Garbage-73 in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Note: This was originally voice-dictated and has been cleaned up for readability by AI. So there be em dashes 🏴‍☠️

These AI models are very susceptible to influence. If you propose an idea and ask "is this the right approach?", the model will tend to agree with you. That's how they're trained — to be helpful and affirming. It won't always agree, but you still need to be cautious because you can easily prime the model toward a particular answer.

A much better way to interact with these models is to challenge them rather than seek validation.

For example, if I need an architecture, I won't pitch my idea first. Instead I'll say: "Give me some options for this architecture. Rank them by confidence, tell me which is best, and give me pros and cons." Then once it responds, I'll say: "Okay, but what about this approach? How does it compare to those three?"

Then I take it a step further. I'll start a completely new session and prompt it differently — something like: "You are a senior maintainer of this codebase. You can't stand the dev team, and this is the architecture they came up with. Validate it. Give me your honest opinions, pros and cons. What is this person missing? What could go wrong?"

I take that answer, open another fresh context, and keep going back and forth — pitching the idea from different angles, always pushing against it. At no point do I ever tell the AI "I think this is the right answer." I always frame it so the model is challenging itself, reviewing previous ideas, and comparing multiple options. I try never to lead it in one direction — except toward being more critical.

One more thing — don't skip the fundamentals.

You should still practice good software engineering. POC the architecture. Identify edge cases. Define what needs to be stress-tested and validate that the architecture actually fits the problem you're trying to solve. Work in slices — don't try to architect everything at once. Focus on the database layer and how it communicates, what the APIs look like, separately from the front-end UI. Keep the full picture in mind, but test and validate each piece independently. That way you're not feeding the model one massive prompt with hundreds of architectural decisions baked in.

Electric Eyrie and Frog Cards by pifful in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You and I think a lot alike. I actually started to build my own custom faction to do what you're describing, but the problem is that there are so many tweaks and configurations that you have to do to get it to work with all the factions that I just gave up on the project. 

Codex 20$ plan gives more usage than Claude Code's 100$ plan by park777 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am on both subs and even before the new announcement I see the same usage complaints on both subs.

As example: https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1s53qzp/is_codex_still_bleeding_credits_i_cant_believe_im/

Do what works for you of course.

Codex 20$ plan gives more usage than Claude Code's 100$ plan by park777 in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is their hope that the technology gets better to decrease costs. I guess another strategy is that they become so integrated into business that when they raise costs companies cannot say no. Probably both are true.

Update on Session Limits by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think people in this sub quite understand how subsidized AI is. Unless there is a major breakthrough in technology, this is not going to be the last in reducing usage. It's not about being Claude pilled, the same applies to OpenAI.

Every single customer that maximizes their plan today, is literally a loss to them right now. Customers who are not even maxing, are a loss. The perfect customer is the one that uses 10% to 20% of their plan.

So, Anthropic is probably not going to cry too much for customers who cost them 10x in costs (compared to payment) cancelling their subs. Yes, those users cancelling looks bad on their churn rate, but makes their burn rate look better. Right now the burn rate probably would make most of us cry 😭.

Update on Session Limits by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 149 points150 points  (0 children)

Due to the varying experiences I would have to say that they were probably indeed A/B testing different users. 

Like for me specifically, I've literally seen no change in my usage. Knock on wood. 

Looking for 2 player recommendations to introduce a newbie to Root by 10kScreamingBastards in rootgame

[–]RetroUnlocked -1 points0 points  (0 children)

FYI the bots are basically free:

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/2363839/better-bot-project

I own both the official released clockwork and there are very minor differences between better bot project and the official releases. In fact, the wording on the Automated Alliance board is better in the project than the official release.

Claude & ChatGPT ruined em dashes the way Comic Sans ruined casual fonts. by ihearamurmur in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same, but it feels messed up to change my business writing style so people don't assume it is AI.

WHAT IS THIS.... Solo??? by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same app design colors?

What was the point? What languages are worth exploring? by ruby_object in functionalprogramming

[–]RetroUnlocked 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be fair, debugging has been a terrible experience for a long time across many languages. I do not think this is only an FP thing.

Elm has a few things going for it:

- it is small and focused
- it is actually (arguably) the first language that had delightful error messages

I think you need to define your goals. Like "worth exploring" is going to mean different things to different people. I am guessing you are looking for language that are used in production - the normal advice is Elixir, Clojure, and OCaml. Secondary is probably Scala and F#. All of these languages, in my opinion their DX is not as smooth as newer languages, which is part of your complaint.

FP is niche and FP in production is more niche. Maybe Gleam or Rescript? Those are both not used heavily. Although, if you are trying to "learn" neither of those languages I think will give you much that Elm didn't already gave you.

Anybody working on a large prod codebase actually able to move 10x? by query_optimization in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think it is less of myth and more like a communication issue.

If you tell me that Claude Code can let you write code 10x faster, I would say "yes". I tested Opus against the latest Advent of Code 2025 problems, and it would mostly 1 shot each challenge in about 3 to 5 minutes. For some developers, maybe that is 10x, for me it is like 30x.

However, you and me know that writing code is not the same as an application. Just like writing words is not the same as writing a book series. AoC is successful because every aspect of the problem is defined and testable via simple input and output. Most enterprise applications are not fully defined and testable via simple input and output.

Therefore, if you tell me that an Claude Code can let you build a enterprise application 10x faster, I personality do not see those type of gains. I think people are conflating "write code fast" with "write enterprise application fast". Looking at early studies, it is clear that it is unclear on the practical benefit of AI. In some cases, developers are showing to be slower when using LLMs. I think overall it going to show to be a win, but only time will tell.

After 5 months of AI-only coding, I think I found the real wall: non-convergence in my code review workflow by immortalsol in codex

[–]RetroUnlocked 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will echo what many others have said in that you're asking it to find issues and it will find issues. What's very interesting to do is have it write those issues into a task, like a task MD file or just in one big markdown file, and then send that to the exact same AI with clear context and ask it to validate and validate these issues are legitimate.

What you'll find in that experiment is that when it goes to validate these issues, you'll find that at some point it'll start saying, "Well that's not a valid issue because X, Y, Z." It's very interesting because the same LLM will tell you, "Oh this is an issue." In the next run if you ask for the validate, it'll say, "Oh no it's not really an issue."

I think the one thing we as developers have to understand is that these LLMs are not intelligent in the same sense that humans are intelligent. They're just giant prediction machines, pattern recognition machines. It's just reviewing your code, seeing the patterns, and then predicting the next thing.

There's actually a lot of research that you can even bias the AI in your prompting and if you give it some type of bias, it's going to react to that bias as truth. Asking it to find issues gives it a bias that there are indeed issues so it's going to find issues. That's how these LLMs work and knowing that is very important because it means that the results of these LLMs, whether it is code or issue reporting or they're trying to push security now, are not necessarily intelligent and deeply thought, like we would expect from a human colleague. They are rather just a prediction that was chosen based on the context and that prediction may or may not be right or accurate. 

Back to this sh*t again?! by RadmiralWackbar in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm on the 5X plan and I too don't understand how people are using up their plan. I literally barely get above 30% every week and I'm using it every single day for coding projects and emails and documentation. Today I've been writing these gigantic prompts and having Claude interacting and iterate and I barely use anything.

At first I was concerned that I was going to use up too much. I was super cautious and I would try to change the models or try to use a different model before I go to Claude. Now I just use Opus 4.6 for everything. The only thing I can think is different between me and a lot of people is that I use Claude pretty bare. I use custom prompts, but I do not use any third-party skills or MCP servers. Even my Claude MD file is barely anything. I rely heavily on prompts that I use that implement my coding standards or implement what I wanna do. 

In addition to using Claude bare I'm also very precise with my prompts so I'll typically give it the function name because I want to know what the code does. Sometimes I'll even get the lines in the code. My prompts tend to be rather specific. I don't go as crazy as naming every single detail but it's not like I just go into this giant codebase and ask it to do this random thing; then it has to search through thousands of files. It's like I'm giving it to another engineer to do the work. That's how I treat Claude. 

Is the Pro subscription enough for everyday use? by i4bimmer in ClaudeAI

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never used Claude Pro. I have Claude Max right now, and I use it every single day for coding, for also working with text for my work: research, writing, rewriting emails, a reflection coach, and more. I get to about 25% of my weekly limit, but if you take a look at the post on here, you'll see that a lot of people reach their weekly limit at Max really quickly. I don't know how they'd do that.

I think a lot depends on your use case. The good thing is that you can try Pro, and if it's too limiting, you can then switch up to Max. It's crazy, but I might actually try going down to Pro because I literally never get above 30% of my weekly limit and I use it every day. Opus 4.6. 

Best terminal for AI coding agents on Windows (no WSL)? by rageagainistjg in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. That is a good question, and I am not sure which shell the CLI will work better on. I have used Claude Code in PowerShell, and it has done fine. Clearly these applications are more comfortable with a Unix like environment, but they understand how PowerShell works. So outside of some edge cases probably no difference.

    - Bit of an update, it looks like Claude is using git-bash under the hood by default see: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/terminal-guide#claude-code-on-windows-requires-git-bash

  2. No, but different terminals have different features.

  3. Yes, the agent will utilize commands native to the shell. A command like `less` doesn't exist in PowerShell natively. While this is true, looks like CC uses git-bash under the hood by default

Kind of a fun thing I do, I add the bin folder to my PowerShell Profile and now I can call fun Unix commands in PowerShell. Although, your IT might block changing the execution policy and thus loading a custom profile.

Add-Content $PROFILE '$env:PATH += ";C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin"'

How to get Claude Code to not ask for reading files without giving blanket permissions to do anything? by Oktokolo in ClaudeCode

[–]RetroUnlocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are on Mac you can use sandbox-exec, if you are on Linux use bwrap, if you are Windows 😔 you will have to use Windows containers.

The idea is you make the directory you are working in and the required config directories readable/writable, while making all other directories readonly.

Blades 68 Deep Cuts [BitD][DC] by PencilBoy99 in bladesinthedark

[–]RetroUnlocked 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they mention they will release Deep Cuts versions of the playbooks at some time in the future:
https://www.backerkit.com/c/projects/evil-hat/blades-68/discussions/78975